Ultrasound-guided Intermediate Cervical Block Versus Superficial Cervical Block for Carotid Endarterectomy (CERVECHO)
- Full Text View
- Tabular View
- No Study Results Posted
- Disclaimer
- How to Read a Study Record
Purpose
The aim of this prospective, randomised, controlled study is to compare the efficacy of ultrasound-guided intermediate cervical block to superficial block for carotid endarterectomy.
Patients scheduled for carotide endarterectomy under regional anaesthesia (ropivacaine 4.75 mg/ml) are randomised into 2 groups according to the technique of anaesthesia performed: superficial cervical block (Control group) or, ultrasound guided intermediate cervical block (Echo group). Main outcome is cervical block success, defined by surgery performed under regional anaesthesia without supplemental topical lidocaine. Secondary outcomes are rate of conversion to general anaesthesia, total dose of supplemental topical lidocaine and block-related complications.
| Condition | Intervention |
|---|---|
|
Carotid Atherosclerosis Regional Anaesthesia Morbidity |
Other: Ultrasound-guided administration of ropivacaine 4.75 mg/ml Other: landmark based superfical ropivacaine 4.75 mg/ml injection |
| Study Type: | Interventional |
| Study Design: | Allocation: Randomized Endpoint Classification: Safety/Efficacy Study Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment Masking: Single Blind (Outcomes Assessor) Primary Purpose: Supportive Care |
| Official Title: | Ultrasound-guided Intermediate Cervical Block Versus Superficial Cervical Block for Carotid : a Randomised Controlled Trial |
- cervical block success [ Time Frame: surgery time ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]carotid artery endarterectomy performed under regional anaesthesia without supplemental topical lidocaine.
- percentage of conversion to general anaesthesia [ Time Frame: surgery time ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]conversion to general anaesthesia for insufficient analgesia
- percentage of patient needing intraoperative systemic analgesia or sedation [ Time Frame: anaesthesia time ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]if patient related pain in spite of supplemental local anaesthesic. sedation/analgesia let to the discretion of the anesthesist in the operating room
- amount of local anaesthesic used to performed the block [ Time Frame: surgery time ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- regional anaesthesia-related complications [ Time Frame: 7 postoperative days ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]Horner syndrom, facial paralysis, cough, phrenic paralysis
- surgery related complications [ Time Frame: 7 postoperative days ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]hematoma, stroke, bleeding
| Enrollment: | 86 |
| Study Start Date: | April 2011 |
| Study Completion Date: | March 2012 |
| Primary Completion Date: | March 2012 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure) |
| Arms | Assigned Interventions |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: control group
landmark-based superficial cervical block is used. After insertion of the needle superficially below the skin, 20 to 30 ml of 4.75 mg/ml ropivacaine are injected fan-like in the subcutaneus plane.
|
Other: landmark based superfical ropivacaine 4.75 mg/ml injection |
|
Experimental: echo group
ultrasound-guided intermediate cervical block was performed. The probe is placed perpendicular to the skin, in the horizontal plane at the C3-C4 level. Needle is inserted in-plane. 10 ml ropivacaine 4.75mg/ml are injected under ultrasound control, 5 ml injected when needle is withdrawn under ultrasound control, 5 ml in the subcutaneous plane.
|
Other: Ultrasound-guided administration of ropivacaine 4.75 mg/ml |
Eligibility| Ages Eligible for Study: | 18 Years and older |
| Genders Eligible for Study: | Both |
| Accepts Healthy Volunteers: | No |
Inclusion Criteria:
- patient scheduled for elective carotid artery endarterectomy under regional anaesthesia
Exclusion Criteria:
- indication for general anaesthesia
- known bleedind diathesis
- past medical allergy to local anaesthesic
- severe chronic pulmonary disease
- contralateral diaphragmatic motion abnormalities
- previous cervical ipsilateral surgery
- age < 18 years
Contacts and Locations| France | |
| Centre Hospitalier universitaire de Besançon | |
| Besançon, France, 25000 | |
| Principal Investigator: | Pascal Petit, MD | CHRU Besançon |
| Principal Investigator: | Sebastien Pili-Floury, MD PhD | CHRU Besançon |
More Information
No publications provided
| Responsible Party: | Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Besancon |
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT01742845 History of Changes |
| Other Study ID Numbers: | P/2010/107 |
| Study First Received: | December 3, 2012 |
| Last Updated: | December 3, 2012 |
| Health Authority: | France: Afssaps - Agence française de sécurité sanitaire des produits de santé (Saint-Denis) France: Committee for the Protection of Personnes |
Keywords provided by Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Besancon:
|
Ultrasound-guided regional anaesthesia Cervical block |
Additional relevant MeSH terms:
|
Atherosclerosis Carotid Artery Diseases Arteriosclerosis Arterial Occlusive Diseases Vascular Diseases Cardiovascular Diseases Cerebrovascular Disorders Brain Diseases Central Nervous System Diseases Nervous System Diseases |
Ropivacaine Anesthetics, Local Anesthetics Central Nervous System Depressants Physiological Effects of Drugs Pharmacologic Actions Sensory System Agents Peripheral Nervous System Agents Central Nervous System Agents Therapeutic Uses |
ClinicalTrials.gov processed this record on May 23, 2013