Multimodal Exercises to Improve Leg Function After Spinal Cord Injury
- Full Text View
- Tabular View
- No Study Results Posted
- Disclaimer
- How to Read a Study Record
Purpose
Many people with spinal cord injury (SCI) retain at least some movement below their injury, but their muscles often have a 'mind of their own'. Typical exercise programs focus on keeping muscles strong and flexible, but don't usually focus on helping patients control their muscles. Our exercise research study will compare two different programs with the specific goal of improving conscious control of patients' muscles below the injury. This study focuses on those with 'thoracic' SCI - where legs are affected, but not the arms.
The first phase of the study will be observational - we will analyze which nerve connections might remain partially intact through the injury (even if the nerves aren't consciously controlled). Participants with all severity of SCI may participate in this first phase.
The second phase of the study will involve people who retain at least some ability to move their legs, and will compare two different exercise rehabilitation strategies: weight-supported treadmill training; and balance training combined with skilled hand exercises.
We will compare the effects of these exercise programs on a variety of outcomes, including gait speed, balance, strength, and muscle activation in response to brain stimulation.
We hypothesize that participants with thoracic SCI undergoing combined balance/hand training will show improved outcomes compared with participants undergoing traditional gait or balance training.
| Condition | Intervention |
|---|---|
|
Spinal Cord Injuries Paraplegia Paraparesis |
Device: Robotic body weight supported treadmill training Other: Multimodal training |
| Study Type: | Interventional |
| Study Design: | Allocation: Randomized Endpoint Classification: Efficacy Study Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment Masking: Single Blind (Outcomes Assessor) Primary Purpose: Treatment |
| Official Title: | A Hebbian Approach to Regaining Control of Spared Circuits in Spinal Cord Injury |
- Change in motor evoked potential (MEP) amplitude in the tibialis anterior muscle at the end of training. [ Time Frame: Eval #1 at baseline; Eval #2 at end of training (48 sessions); Eval #3 at 6-week follow-up ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]Change between baseline and Evaluation #2 in motor evoked potential area in the tibialis anterior muscle.
- Change from baseline in ASIA Impairment Scale (AIS) sensory scores. [ Time Frame: Eval #1 at baseline; Eval #2 at end of training (48 sessions); Eval #3 at 6-week follow-up ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- Change from baseline in AIS lower extremity motor score. [ Time Frame: Eval #1 at baseline; Eval #2 at end of training (48 sessions); Eval #3 at 6-week follow-up ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- Change from baseline in Berg Balance Scale sitting with back unsupported score. [ Time Frame: Eval #1 at baseline; Eval #2 at end of training (48 sessions); Eval #3 at 6-week follow-up ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- Change in leg spasticity on modified Ashworth Scale [ Time Frame: Eval #1 at baseline; Eval #2 at end of training (48 sessions); Eval #3 at 6-week follow-up ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- Change in gait speed on 10-meter Walk Test. [ Time Frame: Eval #1 at baseline; Eval #2 at end of training (48 sessions); Eval #3 at 6-week follow-up ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- Change from baseline in Walking Index for Spinal Cord Injury II (WISCI II) scale. [ Time Frame: Eval #1 at baseline; Eval #2 at end of training (48 sessions); Eval #3 at 6-week follow-up ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- Change from baseline in total number of steps taken by both feet during seated 10-second step test. [ Time Frame: Eval #1 at baseline; Eval #2 at end of training (48 sessions); Eval #3 at 6-week follow-up ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- Change in subjective pain as determined by McGill Pain Questionnaire (short form). [ Time Frame: Eval #1 at baseline; Eval #2 at end of training (48 sessions); Eval #3 at 6-week follow-up ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- Change from baseline in endpoint excursion and directional control parameters achieved during seated Limits of Stability testing. [ Time Frame: Time Frame: Eval #1 at baseline; Eval #2 at end of training (48 sessions); Eval #3 at 6-week follow-up ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]Seated posturography performed using Smart EquiTest apparatus (Neurocom).
- Change from baseline in soleus H-reflex facilitation. [ Time Frame: Time Frame: Eval #1 at baseline; Eval #2 at end of training (48 sessions); Eval #3 at 6-week follow-up ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- Change from baseline in the Voluntary Response Index (VRI) for key leg muscles as detected by surface electromyography (Lee et al., 2004). [ Time Frame: Eval #1 at baseline; Eval #2 at end of training (48 sessions); Eval #3 at 6-week follow-up ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
| Estimated Enrollment: | 75 |
| Study Start Date: | January 2013 |
| Estimated Study Completion Date: | February 2016 |
| Estimated Primary Completion Date: | December 2015 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure) |
| Arms | Assigned Interventions |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Multimodal training
Participants will undergo harness-supported balance training exercises while simultaneously performing skilled hand exercises.
|
Other: Multimodal training
30-minute sessions will be conducted 3-4 times per week for a total of 48 sessions over 12 to 16 weeks.
Other Name: balance exercises, skilled hand exercises
|
|
Active Comparator: Treadmill training
Robotic body weight supported treadmill training will be applied using the Lokomat apparatus.
|
Device: Robotic body weight supported treadmill training
30-minute sessions will be conducted 3-4 times per week for a total of 48 sessions over 12 to 16 weeks.
Other Name: Lokomat
|
Eligibility| Ages Eligible for Study: | 21 Years to 65 Years |
| Genders Eligible for Study: | Both |
| Accepts Healthy Volunteers: | No |
Inclusion Criteria:
- Males or females age 21-65 years;
- SCI duration > 12 months;
- SCI level T1-T12;
- All SCI severity eligible for baseline testing;
- For exercise protocol, must have severity of Grade C or D on ASIA Impairment Scale, or volitional strength of at least 1/5 in two or more key lower extremity muscles;
- Able to tolerate upright position with support;
- Morphologically capable of fitting a weight-support harness and robotic treadmill system;
- Ability to give informed consent.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Unsuitable cognitive capacity as judged by the study physician;
- Diagnosis of neurological injury other than SCI, such as stroke, traumatic brain injury, or other neurological condition that the study physician considers to be exclusionary;
- Multiple spinal cord lesions;
- History of frequent autonomic dysreflexia;
- History of seizures;
- Use of medications that significantly lower seizure threshold, such as anti-psychotics, tricyclic antidepressants, amphetamines, and bupropion;
- History of implanted brain/spine/nerve stimulators, aneurysm clips, or cardiac pacemaker/defibrillator;
- Deep vein thrombosis in lower extremities of less than 6 months duration;
- Pregnancy;
- (Interventional phase only): Lack of detectable tibialis anterior MEP at baseline even with active facilitation;
- (Interventional phase only): Pressure ulcers greater than stage 1 severity on the foot, ankle, knee and/or pelvic girdle;
- (Interventional phase only): Bone mineral density of the hip (proximal femur) T-score <3.5 SD from age- and gender-matched normative data;
- (Interventional phase only): Any spasticity, contractures, or heterotopic ossification that result in inadequate range of motion of the shoulder, elbow, wrist, fingers, hip, knee, or ankle joints in the judgment of the study physician;
- (Interventional phase only): Inability to cooperate with instructions or unwilling to commit to daily training sessions for 3-4 days per week over 12-16 weeks;
- (Interventional phase only): A diagnosis of coronary artery disease that precludes moderate to intense exercise.
Contacts and Locations| Contact: Noam Y Harel, MD | (718) 584-9000 ext 1742 | noam.harel@va.gov |
| Contact: Stephanie Pena, BS | (718) 584-9000 ext 3123 | stephanie.pena@va.gov |
| United States, New York | |
| James J. Peters VA Medical Center, Bronx, NY | Recruiting |
| Bronx, New York, United States, 10468 | |
| Contact: Noam Y Harel, MD 718-584-9000 ext 1742 noam.harel@va.gov | |
| Principal Investigator: Noam Y. Harel, MD | |
| Principal Investigator: | Noam Y. Harel, MD | Department of Veterans Affairs |
More Information
No publications provided
| Responsible Party: | Department of Veterans Affairs |
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT01740128 History of Changes |
| Other Study ID Numbers: | B0881-W, 1IK2RX000881, 01407 |
| Study First Received: | November 30, 2012 |
| Last Updated: | April 26, 2013 |
| Health Authority: | United States: Federal Government |
Keywords provided by Department of Veterans Affairs:
|
spinal cord injuries paraplegia postural balance locomotor activity |
exercise therapy electromyography transcranial magnetic stimulation, single pulse |
Additional relevant MeSH terms:
|
Paraplegia Spinal Cord Injuries Paraparesis Paralysis Neurologic Manifestations Nervous System Diseases |
Signs and Symptoms Spinal Cord Diseases Central Nervous System Diseases Trauma, Nervous System Wounds and Injuries Paresis |
ClinicalTrials.gov processed this record on June 17, 2013