S-ICD® System Post Approval Study
- Full Text View
- Tabular View
- No Study Results Posted
- Disclaimer
- How to Read a Study Record
Purpose
The purpose of the S-ICD Post Approval Study is to document long term safety and effectiveness outcomes associated with the implantation of the SQ-RX pulse generator and Q-TRAK electrode in a commercial clinical setting.
| Condition | Intervention |
|---|---|
|
Primary Prevention of Sudden Cardiac Arrest Secondary Prevention of Sudden Cardiac Arrest |
Device: S-ICD System |
| Study Type: | Observational |
| Study Design: | Observational Model: Cohort |
| Official Title: | S-ICD® System Post Approval Study |
- Type I Complication Free Rate [ Time Frame: 60 months (1800 days) ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]Type I complications are adverse events caused by a component of the S-ICD System (i.e. pulse generator, electrode, EIT or programmer) that results in permanent loss of device function, invasive intervention or death.
- Overall Shock Effectiveness in Converting Spontaneous Discrete Episodes of VT/VF [ Time Frame: 60 months (1800 days) ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]Overall shock effectiveness refers to conversion of an episode following on any of the 5 shocks (maximum) that may be delivered during a single episode. Discrete episodes of VT/VF are those that are temporally independent (<3 within a 24 hour period), unlike storm episodes, which occur in clusters (≥3 episodes within a 24 hour period). Episodes that spontaneously terminate will be excluded from this endpoint since the effectiveness of the shock cannot be evaluated in such circumstances.
- Electrode-Related Complication Free Rate. [ Time Frame: 60 months (1800 days) ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]A complication is an adverse event that results in permanent loss of device function, invasive intervention or death.
- First Shock Effectiveness in Converting Induced (Acute) and Spontaneous Discrete Episodes of VT/VF [ Time Frame: 60 months (1800 days) ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- Freedom from complications requiring surgical revisions of the pulse generator or electrode, including pocket revisions, surgical repositioning or removal of the device in response to product performance issues [ Time Frame: 60 months (1800 days) ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
- Individual rates of each adverse event category contributing to the primary and secondary safety endpoints [ Time Frame: 60 months (1800 days) ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]Will be examined including two-sided 95% exact confidence intervals
- All cause mortality [ Time Frame: 60 months (1800 days) ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
- Electrical performance data recorded by the device [ Time Frame: 60 months (1800 days) ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- Mechanical electrode failures [ Time Frame: 60 months (1800 days) ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
- Explants and causes [ Time Frame: 60 months (1800 days) ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- Transvenous ICD (TV-ICD) implantation following subcutaneous ICD (S-ICD) explant [ Time Frame: 60 months (1800 days) ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- Surgical revisions in response to suboptimal placement or system movement [ Time Frame: 60 months (1800 days) ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
- Chronic pain/discomfort requiring surgical intervention [ Time Frame: 60 months (1800 days) ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
- Removal of S-ICD System in response to implant testing [ Time Frame: 60 months (1800 days) ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
- Syncope associated with VT/VF episodes [ Time Frame: 60 months (1800 days) ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
- Inappropriate shock incidence [ Time Frame: 60 months (1800 days) ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- Premature battery depletions and other device malfunctions [ Time Frame: 60 months (1800 days) ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
| Estimated Enrollment: | 1616 |
| Study Start Date: | March 2013 |
| Estimated Study Completion Date: | September 2019 |
| Estimated Primary Completion Date: | June 2019 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure) |
| Groups/Cohorts | Assigned Interventions |
|---|---|
| S-ICD System Implant Attempt | Device: S-ICD System |
Detailed Description:
The S-ICD Post Approval Study is a non-randomized registry that will retrospectively enroll subjects who participated in the S-ICD Clinical Investigation (IDE G090013) and prospectively enroll new candidates for the S-ICD System. The target enrollment sample size is 1,616 subjects at up to 150 investigational sites to achieve 1,025 subjects in the analysis cohort at 60 months.
- The primary safety endpoint of the study is the Type I (caused by the S-ICD System) Complication Free Rate at 60 months compared to a performance goal of 85%.
- The primary effectiveness endpoint is the Overall Shock Effectiveness in Converting Spontaneous Discrete Episodes of VT/VF through 60 months compared to a performance goal of 94%.
- The secondary safety endpoint of the study is the Electrode-Related Complication Free Rate at 60 months compared to a performance goal of 92.5%.
- The secondary effectiveness endpoint is First Shock Effectiveness in Converting Induced (Acute) and Spontaneous Discrete Episodes of VT/VF through 60 months compared to a performance goal of 84.0%.
Additional objectives include characterization of long term safety and effectiveness in subjects of varied body habitus and in traditionally underrepresented populations.
Subjects must meet the following criteria to be eligible for inclusion in the study:
- Eligible for implantation with an S-ICD System, OR previously implanted with an S-ICD System in the S-ICD System Clinical Investigation (IDE G090013)
- Willing and able to provide written informed consent or have informed consent provided by a legal representative
Subjects who meet the following criteria must be excluded from the study:
1. Remaining life expectancy of less than 360 days
Enrolled subjects will be followed at the implant procedure, predischarge and annual(±60 days) follow-up visits. Subjects are followed according to the standard of care at their participating investigational center.
Eligibility| Genders Eligible for Study: | Both |
| Accepts Healthy Volunteers: | No |
| Sampling Method: | Probability Sample |
The S-ICD System is intended to provide defibrillation therapy for the treatment of life-threatening ventricular tachyarrhythmias in patients who do not have symptomatic bradycardia, incessant ventricular tachycardia, or spontaneous, frequently recurring ventricular tachycardia that is reliably terminated with anti-tachycardia pacing.
Inclusion Criteria:
- Eligible for implantation with an S-ICD System, OR previously implanted with an S-ICD System in the S-ICD System Clinical Investigation (IDE G090013)
AND
- Willing and able to provide written informed consent or have informed consent provided by a legal representative
Exclusion Criteria:
- Remaining life expectancy of less than 360 days
Contacts and Locations| Contact: Michael P Husby, MS, MPH | 312-402-1877 | michael.husby@bsci.com |
Show 27 Study Locations
More Information
No publications provided
| Responsible Party: | Cameron Health, Inc. |
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT01736618 History of Changes |
| Other Study ID Numbers: | BSC CRM CDM00055718, BSC CRM CDM00055718 |
| Study First Received: | November 27, 2012 |
| Last Updated: | February 9, 2013 |
| Health Authority: | United States: Food and Drug Administration |
Keywords provided by Cameron Health, Inc.:
|
subcutaneous implantable defibrillator post approval study sudden cardiac arrest Cameron Health defibrillator |
Additional relevant MeSH terms:
|
Heart Arrest Death, Sudden, Cardiac Heart Diseases Cardiovascular Diseases |
Death, Sudden Death Pathologic Processes |
ClinicalTrials.gov processed this record on May 16, 2013