Anesthetic Technique for AV Fistulae Creation
- Full Text View
- Tabular View
- No Study Results Posted
- Disclaimer
- How to Read a Study Record
Purpose
This study is being done to compare the two anesthesia techniques which are commonly used in the formation of arteriovenous fistulas: local anesthesia and regional anesthesia. Local anesthesia means that, your doctor will inject numbing medication directly into the tissue or part of your body where the surgery will be done. In this case, the numbing medication will be injected directly into the area where your fistula will be made. In regional anesthesia, the numbing medication will be injected around the nerve (part of the body that gives sensation) for your arm, to make the entire arm numb. The purpose of this study is to compare the three month success rates of AV fistulae created by the two anesthesia techniques.
| Condition | Intervention | Phase |
|---|---|---|
|
End Stage Renal Failure on Dialysis |
Procedure: regional anesthesia Procedure: local anesthesia |
Phase 4 |
| Study Type: | Interventional |
| Study Design: | Allocation: Randomized Endpoint Classification: Safety/Efficacy Study Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment Masking: Single Blind (Outcomes Assessor) Primary Purpose: Treatment |
- AV fistula success rate [ Time Frame: Three months from the day of creation ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]To evaluate the three-month success rate for AV fistulas constructed while using regional anesthesia against those constructed while using local anesthesia. Success will be evaluated by a dialysis access ultrasound, which will be performed three months after completion of the procedure. Successful will be defined as a mean blood flow of 600 ml/min and above, or receiving hemodialysis using the newly created AV fistula.
- Short term comfort level [ Time Frame: Within three days of procedure ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]To assess patient comfort level after creation of AV fistula (e.g. nausea, analgesia).
- Short term safety, number of post operative complications [ Time Frame: Three days after the creation ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]b) To evaluate the immediate complications (within 3 days)after AV fistula construction under regional anesthesia or local anesthesia.
| Estimated Enrollment: | 175 |
| Study Start Date: | February 2012 |
| Estimated Study Completion Date: | February 2014 |
| Estimated Primary Completion Date: | February 2014 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure) |
| Arms | Assigned Interventions |
|---|---|
| Active Comparator: Local anesthesia |
Procedure: regional anesthesia
Regional anesthesia will be compared to local anesthesia
|
| Active Comparator: regional anesthesia |
Procedure: local anesthesia
Regional anesthesia will be compared to local anesthesia
|
Detailed Description:
The primary objectives of the study are:
- To evaluate the three-month success rate for AV fistulas constructed while using regional anesthesia against those constructed while using local anesthesia. Success will be evaluated by a dialysis access ultrasound, which will be performed three months after completion of the procedure. Successful will be defined as a mean blood flow of 600 ml/min and above, or receiving hemodialysis using the newly created AV fistula.
- To evaluate the immediate (within 3 days) and long-term complications three months after AV fistula construction under regional anesthesia or local anesthesia.
The secondary objective of the study is to use a short questionnaire survey To assess patient comfort level after creation of AV fistula (e.g. nausea, analgesia).
Eligibility| Ages Eligible for Study: | 21 Years to 70 Years |
| Genders Eligible for Study: | Both |
| Accepts Healthy Volunteers: | No |
Inclusion Criteria:
- Age 21-70 years old
- Able to give informed consent
- Creation of first time AV fistula
- Possible 3 month follow up visit
- ASA-I-IV
Exclusion Criteria:
- BMI ≥40
- Repeated AV fistula creation,
- ASA -V,
- Allergic to local anesthetic agents,
- Significant lung and cardiac disease,
- Infection at the site of regional anesthesia,
- Pre-existing peripheral nerve damage,
- Significant bleeding disorders,
Contacts and Locations| Contact: Singh Nair | 718-920-5932 | sinair@montefiore.org |
| Contact: Naum Shaparin, MD | 718-920-8946 | nshapari@montefiore.org |
| United States, New York | |
| Montefiore Medical Center | Recruiting |
| Bronx, New York, United States, 10467 | |
| Contact: Singh Nair 718-920-5932 sinair@montefiore.org | |
| Principal Investigator: Naum Shaparin, MD | |
More Information
No publications provided
| Responsible Party: | Naum Shaparin, Assistant Professor, Montefiore Medical Center |
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT01727557 History of Changes |
| Other Study ID Numbers: | AV Fistulae |
| Study First Received: | June 8, 2012 |
| Last Updated: | November 15, 2012 |
| Health Authority: | United States: Food and Drug Administration |
Keywords provided by Montefiore Medical Center:
|
Hemodialysis and AV fistula |
Additional relevant MeSH terms:
|
Kidney Failure, Chronic Renal Insufficiency Renal Insufficiency, Chronic Kidney Diseases Urologic Diseases Anesthetics |
Central Nervous System Depressants Physiological Effects of Drugs Pharmacologic Actions Central Nervous System Agents Therapeutic Uses |
ClinicalTrials.gov processed this record on May 23, 2013