CT-angiographic Follow up of Patients That Underwent Coronary Bypass Surgery Between 1993-1997
- Full Text View
- Tabular View
- No Study Results Posted
- Disclaimer
- How to Read a Study Record
Purpose
Coronary artery surgery (CABG) is necessary to improve blood circulation in many patients with coronary artery disease. This is done by using alternative blood vessels (grafts) to bypass the stenosed coronary arteries. In CABG, vein grafts are traditionally used where surrounding tissue is removed, this may damage the vessel and influence its patency.
The "no-touch" technique was developed by Professor Domingos Souza at the Department of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery, Örebro University Hospital. This technique includes taking out the vein with its surrounding tissue and by this way the vessel is less damaged. The first two follow ups have shown that no-touch grafts had better patency than conventionally extracted graft at 18 months and 8.5 years.
This long term follow up is a continuation of the randomized trial started in 1993 where the patency and incidence of stenoses in the no touch and conventional vein grafts has been studied.
| Condition | Intervention |
|---|---|
|
Coronary Artery Disease |
Procedure: No touch technique Procedure: Conventional technique |
| Study Type: | Interventional |
| Study Design: | Allocation: Randomized Endpoint Classification: Efficacy Study Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment Masking: Single Blind (Investigator) Primary Purpose: Treatment |
| Official Title: | CT-angiographic Follow Upp of Patients That Underwent Coronary Bypass Surgery Between 1993-1997. A Randomized Longitudinal Trial. |
- Patency of the grafts [ Time Frame: Mean time of 15 years. ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- Stenosis in the grafts. [ Time Frame: Mean time of 15 years. ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
| Enrollment: | 52 |
| Study Start Date: | June 2010 |
| Study Completion Date: | November 2011 |
| Primary Completion Date: | November 2011 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure) |
| Arms | Assigned Interventions |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: No touch vein grafts
The grafts were harvested with there surrounding tissues.
|
Procedure: No touch technique
The vein graft is harvested with its surronding tissues.
|
|
Active Comparator: Conventional vein grafts.
The grafts were stripped from surrounding tissue.
|
Procedure: Conventional technique
The vein graft is stripped from its surrounding tissues.
|
Eligibility| Genders Eligible for Study: | Both |
| Accepts Healthy Volunteers: | No |
Inclusion Criteria:
- First time coronary artery bypass grafting with either conventional or no touch vein grafts performed by Dr.Souza between 1993-1997.
- Included in the previous follow up studies
- Signed and dated consent.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Allergy to contrast
- Renal failure
- Uncontrolled diabetes
- Unable to implement the study according to protocol -
Contacts and Locations
More Information
Publications:
| Responsible Party: | Ninos Samano M.D., Doctor, Örebro County Council |
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT01686100 History of Changes |
| Other Study ID Numbers: | 102841 |
| Study First Received: | September 12, 2012 |
| Last Updated: | September 18, 2012 |
| Health Authority: | Sweden: Regional Ethical Review Board |
Keywords provided by Örebro County Council:
|
Coronary artery bypass grafting Saphenous vein grafts |
Additional relevant MeSH terms:
|
Coronary Artery Disease Myocardial Ischemia Coronary Disease Heart Diseases |
Cardiovascular Diseases Arteriosclerosis Arterial Occlusive Diseases Vascular Diseases |
ClinicalTrials.gov processed this record on May 19, 2013