Safety and Efficacy of Endotracheal Intubation Using Glidescope Video-Laryngoscope
This study has been completed.
Sponsor:
Beth Israel Medical Center
Information provided by (Responsible Party):
Beth Israel Medical Center
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT01683526
First received: September 6, 2012
Last updated: May 2, 2013
Last verified: May 2013
- Full Text View
- Tabular View
- No Study Results Posted
- Disclaimer
- How to Read a Study Record
Purpose
The safety and efficacy of a video-laryngoscope as a primary intubation tool in urgent endotracheal intubation of critically-ill patients has not been well-described in the literature. This study will answer whether using a VL will impact on the efficacy and safety of intubation compared with a traditional direct laryngoscopy.
| Condition | Intervention |
|---|---|
|
Respiratory Failure |
Procedure: Direct laryngoscopy Device: Video laryngoscopy (Glidescope) |
| Study Type: | Interventional |
| Study Design: | Allocation: Randomized Endpoint Classification: Safety/Efficacy Study Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment Masking: Open Label Primary Purpose: Treatment |
| Official Title: | Safety and Efficacy of Endotracheal Intubation by Pulmonary Critical Care Physicians in Critically-Ill Patients Using Glidescope Video-Laryngoscope |
Resource links provided by NLM:
Further study details as provided by Beth Israel Medical Center:
Primary Outcome Measures:
- First pass success rate [ Time Frame: From begining of intubation to verification. Less then 5 minutes approximatly ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
Secondary Outcome Measures:
- Severe desaturation [ Time Frame: For 10 minutes post intubation ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]sat <80%
- Hypotension [ Time Frame: For 10 minutes post intubation ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]SBP<70
- Cardiac arrest [ Time Frame: For 1 hour post intubation ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
- Complications of intubation [ Time Frame: For 10 minutes post intubation ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]Complications of intubation including aspiration, vomiting, esophageal intubation,and dental injury.
| Enrollment: | 117 |
| Study Start Date: | August 2012 |
| Study Completion Date: | April 2013 |
| Primary Completion Date: | April 2013 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure) |
| Arms | Assigned Interventions |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: Direct laryngoscopy
Intubation will be done using direct laryngoscopy
|
Procedure: Direct laryngoscopy
Other Name: standard laryngoscope
|
|
Active Comparator: Video laryngoscopy
Intubation will be done using video laryngoscopy
|
Device: Video laryngoscopy (Glidescope)
Other Name: Glidescope Video Laryngoscope
|
Eligibility| Ages Eligible for Study: | 18 Years and older |
| Genders Eligible for Study: | Both |
| Accepts Healthy Volunteers: | No |
Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- All patients undergoing urgent endotracheal intubation by a pulmonary critical care medicine physician
Exclusion Criteria:
- Difficult airway
- Oxygen saturation < 92% despite adequate mask ventilation
Contacts and Locations
More Information
No publications provided
| Responsible Party: | Beth Israel Medical Center |
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT01683526 History of Changes |
| Other Study ID Numbers: | 139-12 |
| Study First Received: | September 6, 2012 |
| Last Updated: | May 2, 2013 |
| Health Authority: | United States: Institutional Review Board |
Keywords provided by Beth Israel Medical Center:
|
Urgent endotrachel intubation Direct laryngoscopy Video laryngoscopy Glidescope Critical Care |
Additional relevant MeSH terms:
|
Respiratory Insufficiency Respiration Disorders Respiratory Tract Diseases |
ClinicalTrials.gov processed this record on May 19, 2013