Assessment of Hemodynamic Response During Intubation Between Rigid Laryngoscopy and Track Light in Coronary Patients

This study has been completed.
Sponsor:
Information provided by (Responsible Party):
Marcello F Salgado Filho, MD, Federal University of Juiz de Fora
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT01682707
First received: April 1, 2010
Last updated: September 10, 2012
Last verified: April 2012
  Purpose

Opioids provide greater patient comfort during intubation, but are not able to abolish completely the release adrenergic hormones during the laryngoscopy, which may cause undesirable hemodynamic changes.

In this study the investigators selected two techniques commonly used for intubation, laryngoscopy and track light, so the investigators can verify which intubation techniques provides less hemodynamic changes in coronary patients under standard anesthesia induction.


Condition Intervention Phase
Coronary Disease Undergoing CABG
Procedure: laryngoscopy
Procedure: track light
Phase 4

Study Type: Interventional
Study Design: Allocation: Randomized
Endpoint Classification: Safety Study
Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment
Masking: Open Label
Primary Purpose: Treatment
Official Title: Randomized Clinical Trials to Compare the Hemodynamic Response During Intubation Between Rigid Laryngoscopy and Track Light in Coronary Patients Undergoing CABG

Further study details as provided by Federal University of Juiz de Fora:

Primary Outcome Measures:
  • hemodynamic response [ Time Frame: patient prepare (baseline), 1min after induction, 5 min after induction, 1 min after intubation ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
    tracheal intubation with track light release less adrenergic hormones than laryngoscopy intubation


Enrollment: 40
Study Start Date: February 2010
Study Completion Date: March 2010
Primary Completion Date: March 2010 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure)
Arms Assigned Interventions
Active Comparator: Laryngoscopy
Laryngoscopy Track Light teaqueal intubation
Procedure: laryngoscopy
tracheal intubation with two different techniques, track light and laryngoscopy.
Other Name: rigidy laryngoscopy,
Active Comparator: Track Light Procedure: track light

  Eligibility

Ages Eligible for Study:   40 Years to 70 Years
Genders Eligible for Study:   Both
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:   No
Criteria

Inclusion Criteria:

  • coronary disease ASA 2 e 3 using beta-blockers

Exclusion Criteria:

  • emergency surgery arrythmia other antiarrythmic drugs
  Contacts and Locations
Choosing to participate in a study is an important personal decision. Talk with your doctor and family members or friends about deciding to join a study. To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the Contacts provided below. For general information, see Learn About Clinical Studies.

Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01682707

Locations
Brazil
National Institute of Cardiology / Ministry of Health
Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil, 22240-005
Sponsors and Collaborators
Federal University of Juiz de Fora
Investigators
Principal Investigator: Marcello F Salgado filho, MD Federal University of Juiz de Fora
  More Information

Additional Information:
Publications:
Responsible Party: Marcello F Salgado Filho, MD, Master, Federal University of Juiz de Fora
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01682707     History of Changes
Other Study ID Numbers: CAAE-0021.0.185.000-09
Study First Received: April 1, 2010
Last Updated: September 10, 2012
Health Authority: Brazil: Ministry of Health

Keywords provided by Federal University of Juiz de Fora:
intubation
coronary disease
hemodynamic response
anesthesia with tracheal intubation
assessment of hemodynamic response

Additional relevant MeSH terms:
Coronary Artery Disease
Coronary Disease
Arterial Occlusive Diseases
Arteriosclerosis
Cardiovascular Diseases
Heart Diseases
Myocardial Ischemia
Vascular Diseases

ClinicalTrials.gov processed this record on October 29, 2014