Comparison of Platelet Rich Plasma and Alternative Therapies for the Treatment of Tennis Elbow (Lateral Epicondylitis) (IMPROVE)
- Full Text View
- Tabular View
- No Study Results Posted
- Disclaimer
- How to Read a Study Record
Purpose
"Tennis elbow" is the most common cause of lateral elbow pain, generally caused by either work or sports related repetitive strain. In this condition, a tendon along the outside of the elbow becomes inflamed leading to pain, especially with flexing and extending the elbow.
Many treatments have been tried, including physiotherapy and steroids, with little success. One treatment which has been very effective is the injection of the patients own blood (taken from their other arm) into their abnormal tendon. The blood recruits the patients own healing factors and heals the damaged tendon. As platelets are thought to be largely responsible, injection of concentrated platelets, extracted from the patient's blood (PRP) is a newer, but expensive, technique.
At this point, It is unclear whether whole blood, concentrated platelets, or simply causing the tendon to bleed by making a few small holes (tendon fenestration) is the better treatment.
The goal of this study is to perform a study comparing these three different treatments to identify the best, and most cost-effective therapy, for this debilitating condition.
| Condition | Intervention |
|---|---|
|
Lateral Epicondylitis (Tennis Elbow) |
Other: Platelet Rich Plasma (PRP) Other: Whole Blood Injection Other: Dry Needle Fenestration Other: No Injection |
| Study Type: | Interventional |
| Study Design: | Allocation: Randomized Endpoint Classification: Efficacy Study Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment Masking: Single Blind (Subject) Primary Purpose: Treatment |
| Official Title: | Impact of Platelet Rich Plasma Over Alternative Therapies in Patients With Lateral Epicondylitis. |
- Rate of recruitment [ Time Frame: 12 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]Ability to recruit 60 patients over a 12 month period.
- Adherence to study protocol [ Time Frame: 24 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]Adherence to the study protocol will be measured by the proportion of included patients followed at 1 year, the proportion of data forms completed at 1 year, the number of errors made in randomization and the number of crossovers.
- Pain Reduction [ Time Frame: 1, 2, 3, 6, 12 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]Pain reduction will be measured using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), a subjective scale in which the patient rates their pain on a scale from 0 to 10 (0, no pain, 10, maximum possible pain).
- Functional Disability [ Time Frame: 0, 1,2,3,6,12 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]Functional disability will be measured using Liverpool elbow score which is an assessment tool for evaluating function based on range of motion, ulnar nerve function and ability to perform daily activities.
- Psychological Impairment [ Time Frame: 0, 1, 2, 3, 6, 12 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]Psychological impairment (depression and anxiety) will be assessed using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) which is a reliable, validated, and practical tool for identifying and quantifying anxiety and depression.
- Health-Related Quality of Life [ Time Frame: 0, 1, 2, 3, 6, 12 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]Quality of life will be measured using the 12-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-12).
| Estimated Enrollment: | 60 |
| Study Start Date: | August 2012 |
| Estimated Study Completion Date: | August 2014 |
| Estimated Primary Completion Date: | August 2013 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure) |
| Arms | Assigned Interventions |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Platelet Rich Plasma (PRP) Injection
Patients in this arm will be injected with platelet rich plasma at the site of their lateral epicondylitis.
|
Other: Platelet Rich Plasma (PRP)
|
|
Active Comparator: Whole Blood Injection
Patients in this arm will be injected with whole blood at the site of their lateral epicondylitis.
|
Other: Whole Blood Injection
2. 6mL of autologous whole blood will be drawn from the patient's contralateral arm, using a 19G butterfly needle, and 3mL placed into the common extensor tendon. 3. The remaining 3mL will be sent for analysis of platelet, WBC, and RBC concentrations. |
|
Active Comparator: Dry Needle Fenestration
Patients in this arm will be injected with Marcaine at the site of their lateral epicondylitis and will also receive 10-12 gentle strokes of dry needling (piercing of the tendon). No blood will be injected into the tendon.
|
Other: Dry Needle Fenestration
|
|
Placebo Comparator: No Injection
Patients in this arm will be injected with Marcaine at the site of their lateral epicondylitis.
|
Other: No Injection
|
Eligibility| Ages Eligible for Study: | 20 Years and older |
| Genders Eligible for Study: | Both |
| Accepts Healthy Volunteers: | No |
Inclusion Criteria:
- Adult man or woman aged 20 years or greater.
- Clinical diagnosis of lateral epicondylitis based on site of pain, pain elicited with active extension of the wrist in pronation and elbow extension.
- Documented sonographic diagnosis of common extensor tendinosis and possible tear based on abnormal echotexture (tendon thickening, anechoic areas, areas of hypoechogencicity, loss of fibrillar pattern).
- Chronic symptoms (equal or greater than 3 months).
- Pain of at least 5 out of 10 on a visual analog scale (VAS).
- Provision of informed consent.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Acute symptom onset (less than 3 months).
- History of acute elbow trauma.
- History of rheumatoid arthritis.
- History of malignancy.
- Is the patient pregnant or does the patient plan on becoming pregnant?
- Patient requires anti-platelet medication for the treatment of heart attack, stroke or other medical conditions.
- Previous surgery for lateral epicondylitis.
- Previous local injections, including steroids within the past 6 months.
- Signs of other causes for lateral elbow pain (posterior interosseous nerve entrapment, osteochondral lesion).
- Likely problems, in the judgment of the investigator, with maintaining follow-up?
- Previous randomization in this study or a competing study?
Contacts and Locations| Contact: Mary Chiavaras, MD, PhD | 905-521-2100 ext 46521 | meg.chiavaras@gmail.com |
| Canada, Ontario | |
| Hamilton General Hospital | Recruiting |
| Hamilton, Ontario, Canada, L8L 2X2 | |
| Contact: Marilyn Swinton 9055274322 swinton@mcmaster.ca | |
| Principal Investigator: Meg Chiavaras, MD | |
| Principal Investigator: | Meg Chiavaras, PhD, MD | McMaster University |
More Information
No publications provided
| Responsible Party: | McMaster University |
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT01668953 History of Changes |
| Other Study ID Numbers: | IMPROVE-001, Research Seed Grant # 1204 |
| Study First Received: | August 16, 2012 |
| Last Updated: | May 15, 2013 |
| Health Authority: | Canada: Ethics Review Committee |
Keywords provided by McMaster University:
|
Lateral Epicondylitis Tennis Elbow Platelet Rich Plasma Whole Blood Tendon Fenestration |
Additional relevant MeSH terms:
|
Tennis Elbow Musculoskeletal Diseases Arm Injuries Wounds and Injuries |
ClinicalTrials.gov processed this record on May 23, 2013