Warmed, Humidified Carbon Dioxide Insufflation vs Standard Carbon Dioxide in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
- Full Text View
- Tabular View
- No Study Results Posted
- Disclaimer
- How to Read a Study Record
Purpose
The purpose of this study is to determine the effect of warmed, humidified carbon dioxide Insufflation vs standard carbon dioxide in laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
| Condition |
|---|
|
Cholecystolithiasis |
| Study Type: | Observational |
| Study Design: | Observational Model: Case Control Time Perspective: Prospective |
| Official Title: | Warmed, Humidified Carbon Dioxide Insufflation vs Standard Carbon Dioxide in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: a Double-blinded Randomized Controlled Trial |
- pain (rated with a visual analog scales) [ Time Frame: first day after operation ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]postoperative pain (rated with a visual analog scales) and analgesic requirements at the first postoperative day
- core temperature [ Time Frame: one day postoperativly ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
| Estimated Enrollment: | 146 |
| Study Start Date: | July 2011 |
| Estimated Study Completion Date: | June 2013 |
| Estimated Primary Completion Date: | April 2013 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure) |
| Groups/Cohorts |
|---|
|
warmed, humidified carbon dioxide
warmed, humidified carbon dioxide insufflation vs standard carbon dioxide in laparoscopic cholecystectomy
|
Detailed Description:
Patients undergoing warmed, humidified carbon dioxide (CO2) insufflation for laparoscopic cholecystectomy will have less postoperative pain than patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy with standard CO2 insufflation. The study design is a double-blind, prospective, randomized study comparing patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy with standard CO2 insufflation vs those receiving warmed, humidified CO2. Main variables included postoperative pain (rated with a visual analog scales) and analgesic requirements.
Eligibility| Ages Eligible for Study: | 18 Years and older |
| Genders Eligible for Study: | Both |
| Accepts Healthy Volunteers: | No |
| Sampling Method: | Probability Sample |
Clinical diagnosis of cholecystolithiasis
Inclusion Criteria:
- Clinical diagnosis of cholecystolithiasis
Exclusion Criteria:
- Clinical diagnosis of cholecystolithiasis with cholecystitis
Contacts and Locations| Contact: Bettina Klugsberger, Dr | 0732/7806-2133 | Bettina.Klugsberger@akh.linz.at |
| Austria | |
| 2nd Surgical Department, Academic Teaching Hospital, AKH Linz | Recruiting |
| Linz, Upper Austria, Austria, 4020 | |
| Contact: Andreas Shamiyeh, Univ.-Doz.Dr | |
| Principal Investigator: Klugsberger Bettina, Dr. | |
| Study Chair: | Andreas Shamiyeh, Univ-Doz Dr | Ludwig Boltzmann Institute for Operative Laparoscopy, 2nd Surgical Department, Academic Teaching Hospital, AKH Linz |
More Information
Publications:
| Responsible Party: | Klugsberger Bettina, Dr.med, Ludwig Boltzmann Institute for Operative Laparoscopy |
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT01667848 History of Changes |
| Other Study ID Numbers: | LCHE0909 |
| Study First Received: | July 27, 2012 |
| Last Updated: | April 29, 2013 |
| Health Authority: | Austria : Federal Ministry for Labour, Health, and Social Affairs |
Keywords provided by Ludwig Boltzmann Institute for Operative Laparoscopy:
|
pain |
Additional relevant MeSH terms:
|
Cholecystolithiasis Cholelithiasis Gallstones Biliary Tract Diseases |
Digestive System Diseases Gallbladder Diseases Calculi Pathological Conditions, Anatomical |
ClinicalTrials.gov processed this record on May 23, 2013