The HEP-OKS Study - Hemifield Eye Patching and Optokinetic Stimulation to Treat Hemispatial Neglect in Stroke Patients
- Full Text View
- Tabular View
- No Study Results Posted
- Disclaimer
- How to Read a Study Record
Purpose
Spatial neglect represents one of the major cognitive disorders following stroke. Patients patients fail to be aware of objects or people to their left and orientate instead to their right side. Enduring neglect has been found to be a poor prognostic indicator for functional independence following stroke. Despite some promising experimental accounts there are no established treatments for this condition.
The aim of this study is to test whether a combined treatment with hemifield eye patching (HEP) and optokinetic stimulation (OKS) can permanently reduce neglect behaviour and improve functional outcome in patients with hemispatial neglect following stroke.
The investigators hypothesise that the treatment with HEP and OKS will lead to a greater reduction of neglect scoring in the neglect test battery as well as a greater improvement in functional independence scores as compared to the spontaneous clinical course of the usual-care control group.
| Condition | Intervention | Phase |
|---|---|---|
|
Spatial Neglect Cerebral Stroke |
Behavioral: hemifield eye patching (HEP) + optokinetic stimulation (OKS) |
Phase 3 |
| Study Type: | Interventional |
| Study Design: | Allocation: Randomized Endpoint Classification: Safety/Efficacy Study Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment Masking: Single Blind (Outcomes Assessor) Primary Purpose: Treatment |
| Official Title: | The HEP-OKS Pilot Study - a Randomized Controlled Trial of Hemifield Eye Patching and Optokinetic Stimulation to Treat Hemispatial Neglect in Stroke Patients |
- Total score in a neglect test battery [ Time Frame: Change from baseline at Day 8 (post-treatment) ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]Performance in a neglect test battery (score between 0 and 100%) consisting of standard neglect tests including two cancellation tasks, line bisection, figure copying and text reading
- Functional independence score [ Time Frame: Change from baseline at Day 8 (post-treatment) ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]Level of functional independence (score between 0 and 100%) as measured by the Barthel-Index and the Catherine-Bergego-Scale
- Performance in paper-and-pencil subtests [ Time Frame: Change from baseline at Day 8 and at Day 30 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]The secondary outcome measures include scores of the individual subtests of the neglect test battery, i.e. bells and star cancellation tasks, line bisection, figure copying and text reading.
- Performance in computerized attention tests [ Time Frame: Change from baseline at Day 8 and at Day 30 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]Performance in two computerized attention tests. These comprise a Posner Attention Task and a visual search task including eye movement analyses.
- MRI [ Time Frame: Day 1 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]All patients (without contraindications) undergo cranial Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) including 3D lesion analysis, resting state fMRI and a task-related fMRI with optokinetic stimuli. Patients' MRI data will be correlated to behavioural performance (see primary and other secondary outcome measures) and will also be compared to controls without spatial neglect.
- Total score in the neglect test battery at follow-up [ Time Frame: Change from baseline at Day 30 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]For details please see primary outcome measure
- Functional independence score at follow-up [ Time Frame: Change from baseline at Day 30 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]For details please see primary outcome measure
| Estimated Enrollment: | 50 |
| Study Start Date: | August 2012 |
| Estimated Study Completion Date: | November 2013 |
| Estimated Primary Completion Date: | October 2013 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure) |
| Arms | Assigned Interventions |
|---|---|
|
No Intervention: Usual care
Patients in this control group will receive usual care following stroke including standard physiotherapy and occupational therapy.
|
|
| Experimental: HEP-OKS |
Behavioral: hemifield eye patching (HEP) + optokinetic stimulation (OKS)
Patients in this arm will wear standard spectacle frames containing noncorrective lenses to which right half-field patches are attached (hemifield eye patching, HEP). In case of patients already wearing prescribed glasses, the patches will be attached to their own glasses. The glasses will be worn all-day for the duration of the treatment phase (seven days) and only be removed for sleeping and face cleaning as well as for the duration of the daily OKS treatment sessions. Furthermore these patients will receive daily sessions (20 minutes) of optokinetic stimulation (OKS). Therefore patients will be seated in front of a widescreen monitor, watching a black background with a pattern of various objects (size 1°), which coherently and continuously move to the left at a velocity of 10 °/s. |
Detailed Description:
To specify, this study should answer the following main question: Does the daily wearing of hemifield eye patches over a period of 1 week in combination with daily sessions of optokinetic stimulation lead to a significant reduction of neglect behaviour as measured by total scores in a paper-and-pencil neglect test battery and/or an improvement in functional independence scores (Catherine-Bergego-Scale, Barthel Index) in a cohort of stroke patients with acute hemispatial neglect as compared to the spontaneous course of the disease in a control patient group without a neglect-specific treatment?
Eligibility| Ages Eligible for Study: | 18 Years to 90 Years |
| Genders Eligible for Study: | Both |
| Accepts Healthy Volunteers: | No |
Inclusion Criteria:
- Right hemisphere stroke
- Spatial neglect as determined by pathological scores in at least two tests of a neglect test battery (Azouvi et al., JNNP, 2004)
- Age > 18 years old
- Informed consent signature
Exclusion Criteria:
- Bilateral or previous unilateral stroke lesions
- Pre-existing neurodegenerative disease
- Inability to give informed consent
Contacts and Locations| Contact: Bjoern Machner, MD | +49(0)4515002492 | Bjoern.Machner@neuro.uni-luebeck.de |
| Germany | |
| University of Luebeck, Dept. of Neurology | Recruiting |
| Luebeck, Schleswig-Holstein, Germany, 23538 | |
| Contact: Bjoern Machner, MD Bjoern.Machner@neuro.uni-luebeck.de | |
| Principal Investigator: Bjoern Machner, MD | |
| Principal Investigator: | Bjoern Machner, MD | University of Luebeck |
More Information
No publications provided
| Responsible Party: | Bjoern Machner, MD, Principal Investigator, University of Luebeck |
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT01617343 History of Changes |
| Other Study ID Numbers: | HEP-OKS-01 |
| Study First Received: | June 5, 2012 |
| Last Updated: | August 14, 2012 |
| Health Authority: | Germany: Ethics Commission |
Additional relevant MeSH terms:
|
Stroke Cerebral Infarction Perceptual Disorders Cerebrovascular Disorders Brain Diseases Central Nervous System Diseases Nervous System Diseases |
Vascular Diseases Cardiovascular Diseases Brain Infarction Brain Ischemia Neurobehavioral Manifestations Neurologic Manifestations Signs and Symptoms |
ClinicalTrials.gov processed this record on June 17, 2013