Comparison of Minimal Versus Conventional Extracorporeal Circulation in Coronary Surgery
- Full Text View
- Tabular View
- No Study Results Posted
- Disclaimer
- How to Read a Study Record
Purpose
The aim of this study is to assess the effect of minimal (MECC) versus conventional (CECC) extracorporeal circulation on perfusion characteristics and remote end-organ protection (lungs, brain, kidneys, liver, stomach, intestine), after elective coronary bypass grafting (CABG).
| Condition | Intervention |
|---|---|
|
Coronary Artery Bypass |
Procedure: Coronary artery bypass grafting with the use of minimal extracorporeal circulation Procedure: Coronary artery bypass grafting under conventional extracorporeal circulation |
| Study Type: | Interventional |
| Study Design: | Allocation: Randomized Endpoint Classification: Efficacy Study Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment Masking: Double Blind (Subject, Outcomes Assessor) Primary Purpose: Treatment |
| Official Title: | Research on Remote End-organ Protection, Clinical Outcome and Quality of Life With Implementation of the Novel Minimal Extracorporeal Circulation Circuit in Open Heart Surgery |
- Remote end-organ perfusion and function (brain, lungs, liver, kidneys, stomach, intestine) intraoperatively and postoperatively during hospital stay [ Time Frame: 30 days ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]Remote end-organ perfusion and function at 30 days follow-up after elective coronary artery bypass grafting with the use of minimal (MECC) versus conventional (CECC) extracorporeal circulation.
- Postoperative major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) that comprise: myocardial infarction, low cardiac output syndrome, stroke, renal failure. [ Time Frame: 30 days ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]Postoperative major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) that comprise: myocardial infarction, low cardiac output syndrome, stroke, renal failure at 30 days follow-up after elective coronary artery bypass grafting with the use of minimal (MECC) versus conventional (CECC) extracorporeal circulation.
- Duration of mechanical ventilation [ Time Frame: 30 days ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]Duration of mechanical ventilation at 30 days follow-up after elective coronary artery bypass grafting with the use of minimal (MECC) versus conventional (CECC) extracorporeal circulation.
- Length of ICU stay [ Time Frame: 30 days ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]Length of ICU stay at 30 days follow-up after elective coronary artery bypass grafting with the use of minimal (MECC) versus conventional (CECC) extracorporeal circulation.
- Development of new postoperative atrial fibrillation. [ Time Frame: 30 days ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]Development of new postoperative atrial fibrillation at 30 days follow-up after elective coronary artery bypass grafting with the use of minimal (MECC) versus conventional (CECC) extracorporeal circulation.
| Estimated Enrollment: | 150 |
| Study Start Date: | January 2009 |
| Estimated Study Completion Date: | July 2014 |
| Estimated Primary Completion Date: | June 2013 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure) |
| Arms | Assigned Interventions |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: MECC group
Patients operated for elective coronary artery bypass grafting with the use of minimal extracorporeal circulation.
|
Procedure: Coronary artery bypass grafting with the use of minimal extracorporeal circulation
The MECC system (Maquet Cardiopulmonary, Hirlingen, Germany) consists of a pre-connected closed CPB circuit containing a RotaFlow centrifugal pump and a Quadrox D diffusion membrane oxygenator. A flow meter and a bubble sensor are integrated in the drive unit of the centrifugal pump. The system features a tip-to-tip heparin coating (Bioline Coating, Maquet Cardiopulmonary, Hirlingen, Germany). No arterial or venous line filters are included. Initial priming volume of the system is 500 mL, while using retrograde autologous priming (RAP) the circuit could be filled in with autologous blood, thus reducing hemodilution. Since no cardiotomy suction is used, shed blood is collected with a cell-saving device (Haemonetics Corp, Braintree, MA).
|
|
Active Comparator: CECC group
Patients operated for elective coronary artery bypass grafting under conventional extracorporeal circulation
|
Procedure: Coronary artery bypass grafting under conventional extracorporeal circulation
A standard open CPB circuit is used, consisting of uncoated PVC tubing, a hard-shell venous reservoir, a microporous membrane oxygenator (Dideco, Mirandola, Italy) and a roller pump (Stöckert S3, Munich, Germany). The circuit contains a 40 μm arterial line blood filter (Dideco, Mirandola, Italy) and it is primed with 1500 mL of a balanced crystalloid/colloid solution (1000 mL of Ringer's solution, 200 mL of mannitol 20%, and 300 mL of hydroxyethyl starch 6%). Cardiotomy as well as sump sucker are integrated to the circuit.
|
Detailed Description:
The aim of this study is to investigate whether coronary surgery with MECC offers advantage over conventional CPB (CECC). In order to draw an evidence-based conclusion, the investigators aim to evaluate perfusion characteristics during coronary surgery with MECC and associated remote end-organ function. Improved end-organ protection translates into improved clinical outcome which greatly affects quality of life. This is the first study in the literature adequately powered to analyse organ pathophysiology during surgery with MECC and at the same time correlating common clinical variables with a detailed quality of life evaluation. Superiority of MECC could provide firm evidence towards widespread use of MECC in coronary surgery as standard of care.
Eligibility| Ages Eligible for Study: | 18 Years to 80 Years |
| Genders Eligible for Study: | Both |
| Accepts Healthy Volunteers: | No |
Inclusion Criteria:
- All patients scheduled for elective coronary artery bypass grafting
Exclusion Criteria:
- history of psychiatric disorder
- inability to undergo neuropsychological assessment
- history of transient ischemic attack or stroke
- carotid artery stenosis > 60% assessed by duplex ultrasonography
Contacts and Locations| Contact: Kyriakos Anastasiadis, DSc, FETCS | +30 2310994845 | anastasiadisk@hotmail.com |
| Contact: Polychronis N Antonitsis, DSc | +30 2310993931 | antonits@otenet.gr |
| Greece | |
| Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, AHEPA University Hospital | Recruiting |
| Thessaloniki, Greece | |
| Contact: Polychronis Antonitsis, DSc +30 2310994871 antonits@otenet.gr | |
| Principal Investigator: Kyriakos Anastasiadis, PhD, FETCS | |
| Sub-Investigator: Polychronis N Antonitsis, PhD | |
| Sub-Investigator: Christos Asteriou, MSc | |
| Principal Investigator: | Kyriakos Anastasiadis, FETCS | Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, AHEPA University Hospital, Thessaloniki, Greece |
More Information
Additional Information:
Publications:
| Responsible Party: | Kyriakos Anastasiadis, Professor, AHEPA University Hospital |
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT01603589 History of Changes |
| Other Study ID Numbers: | AHEPA_CTS_04 |
| Study First Received: | May 21, 2012 |
| Last Updated: | December 18, 2012 |
| Health Authority: | Greece: Ministry of Health and Welfare |
Keywords provided by AHEPA University Hospital:
|
coronary artery disease coronary artery bypass grafting cardiopulmonary bypass minimal extracorporeal circulation |
ClinicalTrials.gov processed this record on May 22, 2013