Antiviral Efficacy of Switching to ETV Plus TDF
- Full Text View
- Tabular View
- No Study Results Posted
- Disclaimer
- How to Read a Study Record
Purpose
Switching to ETV plus TDF combination will result in faster and greater antiviral activity and lower rates of resistance emergence over maintaining LAM/LdT+ADV combination in partial responders to LAM/LdT+ADV rescue therapy.
Earlier switching to combination with the most potent regimen will be more effective to achieve VR and prevent further resistance emergence.
All subjects will orally take assigned drugs once daily for 48 weeks. All subjects will be assessed at baseline and every three months thereafter. Evaluations at each visit will include vital signs, physical examinations, laboratory tests, HBV DNA levels and adverse events. At baseline and every six months thereafter, serum will be assayed for HBV serology. Genotypic analysis will be performed at baseline and 48 weeks.
| Condition | Intervention | Phase |
|---|---|---|
|
Chronic Hepatitis B |
Drug: Group A (Zeffix, Sebivo, Hepsera) Drug: Group B (Baraclude, Viread) |
Phase 4 |
| Study Type: | Interventional |
| Study Design: | Allocation: Randomized Endpoint Classification: Safety/Efficacy Study Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment Masking: Open Label Primary Purpose: Treatment |
| Official Title: | A Randomized, Multicenter, Prospective Study to Compare Antiviral Efficacy and Safety of Switching to ETV Plus TDF Versus Maintaining LAM/LDT Plus ADF Combination in CHC With PVR to LAM/LDF Plus ADF Combination Rescue Therapy for YMDD Mutation |
- The proportion of subjects who achieve virologic response(HBV DNA < 60 IU/mL, approximately 300 copies/mL) by real-time PCR at Week 48 [ Time Frame: at Week 48 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]To compare the proportion of subjects who achieve virologic response(HBV DNA < 60 IU/mL, approximately 300 copies/mL) in switching group(Entecavir plus Tenofovir) with that in maintaining group(Lamivudine/Telbivudine plus Adefovir) by real-time PCR at Week 48
- Virologic efficacy [ Time Frame: Week 12, 24, 36, and 48 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]To compare virologic response in switching group(Entecavir plus Tenofovir) with those in maintaining group (Lamivudine/Telbivudine plus Adefovir) at Week 48
- serologic efficacy [ Time Frame: Week 12, 24, 36, and 48 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]To compare serologic response in switching group(Entecavir plus Tenofovir) with those in maintaining group (Lamivudine/Telbivudine plus Adefovir) at Week 48
- biochemical efficacy [ Time Frame: Week 12, 24, 36, and 48 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]To compare biochemical response in switching group(Entecavir plus Tenofovir) with those in maintaining group (Lamivudine/Telbivudine plus Adefovir) at Week 48
- Safety issue [ Time Frame: Week 12, 24, 36, and 48 ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]To compare safety issue in switching group(Entecavir plus Tenofovir) with those in maintaining group (Lamivudine/Telbivudine plus Adefovir) at Week 48 - severity of adverse event
| Estimated Enrollment: | 104 |
| Study Start Date: | August 2012 |
| Estimated Study Completion Date: | May 2014 |
| Estimated Primary Completion Date: | May 2013 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure) |
| Arms | Assigned Interventions |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: Group A:
Maintaining LAM/LdT+ADV combination Lamivudine 100mg / Telbivudine 600mg +Adefovir 10mg
|
Drug: Group A (Zeffix, Sebivo, Hepsera)
Maintaining LAM/LdT+ADV combination Lamivudine 100mg / Telbivudine 600mg +Adefovir 10mg
Other Names:
|
|
Experimental: Group B
Switching to ETV plus TDF combination Entecavir 1.0mg + Tenofovir 300mg
|
Drug: Group B (Baraclude, Viread)
Switching to ETV plus TDF combination Entecavir 1.0mg + Tenofovir 300mg
Other Names:
|
Detailed Description:
- As TDF has not been approved yet in Korea, current KASL practice guideline generally recommends to add ADV in LAM-resistant or LdT-resistant patients.
- However, several local literatures reported a substantial proportion of patients treated with LAM plus ADV combination therapy showed a persistently inadequate or partial virologic response('VR') and YMDDm still maintained in spite of under rescue combination therapy.
- Due to the unavailability of TDF in Korea, ETV plus ADV combination has being considered a better salvage therapy with non-overlapping cross-resistance profiles in pts who fail to LAM plus ADV rescue therapy and local report demonstrated that the rate of VR was significantly higher with ETV+ADV switching group than LAM+ADV continuation group in partial responder to LAM plus ADV combination rescue therapy for LAM resistance.
- Hence, more earlier combination therapy with the most potent Nucleoside and Nucleotide analogue would be a promising salvage treatment for previous NA treatment failures but comparative prospective trials are limited.
- Therefore, this study will investigate the greater effectiveness and safety of switching to the most potent combination versus maintaining LAM(or LdT) plus ADV and also compare the rate of VR based on the HBV DNA cut-off level at switching - more than and less than 20,000 IU/mL.
All subjects will orally take assigned drugs once daily for 48 weeks. All subjects will be assessed at baseline and every three months thereafter. Evaluations at each visit will include vital signs, physical examinations, laboratory tests, HBV DNA levels and adverse events. At baseline and every six months thereafter, serum will be assayed for HBV serology. Genotypic analysis will be performed at baseline and 48 weeks.
Eligibility| Ages Eligible for Study: | 20 Years and older |
| Genders Eligible for Study: | Both |
| Accepts Healthy Volunteers: | No |
Inclusion Criteria:
- ≥ 20 years of age
- History of HBsAg positive for more than 6 months
- History of genotypic resistance to LAM or LdT (YMDDm)
- Partial responder (HBV DNA ≥ 60 IU/mL) currently receiving antiviral combination rescue therapy for at least 24 weeks of treatment with LAM+ADV or LdT+ADV
- HBeAg-positive and -negative
- Compensated liver disease (Child-Pugh A)
- Signed written informed consent after being instructed about the objective and procedure of the clinical study
Exclusion Criteria:
- History of genotypic resistance to ADV
- Most previous treatment of other than LAM+ADV and LdT+ADV
- Subjects with ALT > 10xULN
- Co-infected with HCV or HIV
- Pregnant or lactating woman
- Subject who needs long-term administration of drugs including immunosuppressive agents, agents related to high risk in the hepatic/renal toxicity, agents influencing renal excretion
- History of liver transplantation or planned for liver transplantation
- Subject who was diagnosed malignant tumor and has been receiving chemotherapy
- Subject who has HCC history or who shows potential HCC finding such as suspicious region in the radiologic exam(abdominal US or CT) or serum AFP elevation
- Renal Insufficiency (CLcr < 50mL/min based on Cockcroft-Gault equation considering weight, ages and serum creatinine)
- Subject who has a liver disease other than chronic hepatitis B (e.g. hemochromatosis, Wilson's disease, alcoholic liver disease, nonalcoholic fatty liver disease, alpha 1-antitrypsin deficiency etc.)
- Subject who has a history of hypersensitivity to study drug or its ingredients
- Subject who is involved in other clinical trial within 60 days prior to study entry
- Subject who the investigator deems inappropriate to participate in this study
Contacts and Locations| Contact: Sang Hoon Ahn, MD, PhD | +82-2-2228-1936 | Ahnsh@yuhs.ac |
| Contact: Jun Yong Park, MD | +82-2-2228-1949 | DRPJY@yuhs.ac |
| Principal Investigator: | Sang Hoon Ahn, MD, PhD | Yonsei University |
More Information
No publications provided
| Responsible Party: | Sang Hoon Ahn, Associate Professor, Yonsei University |
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT01597934 History of Changes |
| Other Study ID Numbers: | AI463-274 |
| Study First Received: | May 8, 2012 |
| Last Updated: | July 20, 2012 |
| Health Authority: | Korea: Institutional Review Board |
Keywords provided by Yonsei University:
|
Chronic hepatitis B Partial virologic response YMDD mutation |
Additional relevant MeSH terms:
|
Hepatitis Hepatitis A Hepatitis B Hepatitis, Chronic Hepatitis B, Chronic Liver Diseases Digestive System Diseases Hepatitis, Viral, Human Virus Diseases Enterovirus Infections Picornaviridae Infections RNA Virus Infections Hepadnaviridae Infections DNA Virus Infections |
Antiviral Agents Adefovir dipivoxil Adefovir Tenofovir disoproxil Entecavir Anti-Infective Agents Therapeutic Uses Pharmacologic Actions Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors Nucleic Acid Synthesis Inhibitors Enzyme Inhibitors Molecular Mechanisms of Pharmacological Action Anti-Retroviral Agents Anti-HIV Agents |
ClinicalTrials.gov processed this record on May 19, 2013