Group Balance Training for People With Multiple Sclerosis
- Full Text View
- Tabular View
- No Study Results Posted
- Disclaimer
- How to Read a Study Record
Purpose
People with multiple sclerosis (MS) often have affected balance capacity and an increased risk for falls. A risk factor for falls are activities requiring dual attention. Another factor leading to reduced balance capacity is trunk stability, and decreased trunk stability has been seen in people with MS compared to healthy controls. Earlier studies using core stability exercises have shown positive effects on balance, compared to no training. In Sweden, physical therapy for people with MS has often included group training. However, evidence for this intervention is scarce. The aim of this study is therefore to investigate balance training in group. The balance training includes core stability exercises and dual attention activities. A multi-centre study is planned with a waiting-list design. Participants are randomised to either exercise group with early start or with late start. The group balance training includes training 60 minutes 2 times per week for 7 weeks.
| Condition | Intervention |
|---|---|
|
Multiple Sclerosis |
Other: Group balance training |
| Study Type: | Interventional |
| Study Design: | Allocation: Randomized Endpoint Classification: Efficacy Study Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment Masking: Single Blind (Investigator) Primary Purpose: Treatment |
| Official Title: | Group Balance Training for People With Multiple Sclerosis |
- Change from Baseline in Bergs balance scale [ Time Frame: Change from Baseline in Bergs balance scale at 7 weeks ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]Functional balance scale in sitting, standing and walking.
- Change from Baseline in Four Square step test [ Time Frame: Change from Baseline in Four Square step test at 7 weeks ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]Dynamic balance
- Change from baseline in Timed chair stands test [ Time Frame: Change from baseline in Times Chair stands test at 7 weeks ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]Functional leg strength, rising 10 times from a chair.
- Change from baseline in Timed Up and Go test [ Time Frame: Change from baseline in Timed Up and Go test at 7 weeks ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]Functional mobility.
- Change from baseline in Functional Gait Assessment [ Time Frame: Change from baseline in Functional Gait Assessment at 7 weeks ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]Gait-related activities
- Change from baseline in Postural sway [ Time Frame: Change from baseline in Postural sway at 7 weeks ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]Using a sway meter postural sway in standing still is assessed.
- Change from baseline in Activities-specific Balance scale [ Time Frame: Change from baseline in Activities-specific Balance scale at 7 weeks ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]16 item questionnaire that includes items on balance self-efficacy
- Change from baseline in 12-item Multiple Sclerosis Walking scale [ Time Frame: Change from baseline in 12-item Multiple Sclerosis Walking scale at 7 weeks ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]self-reported limitations in walking.
- Change from Baseline in Bergs balance scale [ Time Frame: Change from Baseline in Bergs balance scale at 14 weeks ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]Functional balance in sitting, standing and walking
- Change from Baseline in Four Square step test [ Time Frame: Change from baseline in Four Square step test at 14 weeks ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]Dynamic balance
- Change from baseline in Times Chair stands test [ Time Frame: Change from baseline in Times Chair stands test at 14 weeks ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]Functional lower extremity strength
- Change from baseline in Timed Up and Go test [ Time Frame: Change from baseline in Timed Up and Go test at 14 weeks ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]Functional mobility
- Change from baseline in Functional Gait Assessment [ Time Frame: Change from baseline in Functional Gait Assessment at 14 weeks ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]Gait-related activities
- Change from baseline in postoral sway [ Time Frame: Change from baseline in postoral sway at 14 weeks ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]Using a sway meter postural sway in standing still is assessed.
- Change from baseline in Activities-specific Balance scale [ Time Frame: Change from baseline in Activities-specific Balance scale at 14 weeks ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]Balance self-efficacy
- Change from baseline in 12-item Multiple Sclerosis Walking scale [ Time Frame: Change from baseline in 12-item Multiple Sclerosis Walking scale at 14 weeks ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]self-reported limitations in walking
| Estimated Enrollment: | 70 |
| Study Start Date: | August 2012 |
| Estimated Study Completion Date: | April 2013 |
| Estimated Primary Completion Date: | April 2013 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure) |
| Arms | Assigned Interventions |
|---|---|
| Experimental: Group balance training early start |
Other: Group balance training
Balance training i group with focus on core stability exercises and dual attention activities.
|
| Experimental: Group balance training late start |
Other: Group balance training
Balance training i group with focus on core stability exercises and dual attention activities.
|
Eligibility| Ages Eligible for Study: | 18 Years and older |
| Genders Eligible for Study: | Both |
| Accepts Healthy Volunteers: | No |
Inclusion Criteria:
- Diagnosed multiple sclerosis by a neurologist, being able to walk 100 m with or without walking device, being able to get down on the floor with minor assistance
Exclusion Criteria:
- No balance deficit here defined as being able to stand still heel-toe for 30 seconds with arms crossed.
- Ongoing relapse, cognitive- or language difficulties that prohibits performing the outcome measures.
Contacts and Locations| Contact: Anette Forsberg, PhD | +46-19-602 5788 | anette.forsberg@orebroll.se |
| Contact: Ylva Nilsagård, PhD | +46-19-6026223 | ylva.nilsagard@orebroll.se |
| Sweden | |
| Mälarsjukhuset | Not yet recruiting |
| Eskilstuna, Sweden, 63188 | |
| Principal Investigator: Ylva Nilsagård, PhD | |
| Karlstad hospital | Not yet recruiting |
| Karlstad, Sweden | |
| Principal Investigator: Lena Sanner, RPT | |
| Nyköpings hospital | Not yet recruiting |
| Nyköping, Sweden | |
| Principal Investigator: Oskar Davidsson, RPT | |
| Uppsala University hospital | Not yet recruiting |
| Uppsala, Sweden | |
| Principal Investigator: Lena von Koch, PhD | |
| Västerås hospital | Not yet recruiting |
| Västerås, Sweden, 72189 | |
| Principal Investigator: Ingrid Lundström, RPT | |
| University Hospital Örebro | Not yet recruiting |
| Örebro, Sweden, 70185 | |
| Principal Investigator: Anette Forsberg, PhD | |
| Study Chair: | Anette Forsberg, PhD | Family Medicine Research Centre, Örebro county council |
| Principal Investigator: | Ylva Nilsagård, PhD | Centre for Health Care Sciences, Örebro county council |
More Information
No publications provided
| Responsible Party: | Anette Forsberg, PhD, Researcher, RPT, Örebro County Council |
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT01582126 History of Changes |
| Other Study ID Numbers: | Ö-1-12 |
| Study First Received: | April 16, 2012 |
| Last Updated: | April 30, 2012 |
| Health Authority: | Sweden: Regional Ethical Review Board |
Keywords provided by Örebro County Council:
|
multiple sclerosis physical therapy postural control |
Additional relevant MeSH terms:
|
Multiple Sclerosis Sclerosis Demyelinating Autoimmune Diseases, CNS Autoimmune Diseases of the Nervous System Nervous System Diseases |
Demyelinating Diseases Autoimmune Diseases Immune System Diseases Pathologic Processes |
ClinicalTrials.gov processed this record on May 16, 2013