Microbial Community Transplantation on the Armpit/Foot
This study is not yet open for participant recruitment.
Verified April 2012 by University Ghent
Sponsor:
University Ghent
Information provided by (Responsible Party):
University Ghent
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT01581112
First received: April 18, 2012
Last updated: NA
Last verified: April 2012
History: No changes posted
- Full Text View
- Tabular View
- No Study Results Posted
- Disclaimer
- How to Read a Study Record
Purpose
The malodour generation of a person's armpit/foot is caused by the bacteria thriving on that armpit/foot. In order to alter or reduce once bad body odour or foot odour, the living microbial community on the foot/armpit of a non-malodorous person will be transmitted (or up scaled and transmitted) to the foot/armpit of a malodorous person. The odour is evaluated by a trained smelling panel, the bacteria living on the armpit/foot is examined by means of molecular techniques. The microbial transplantation and its follow-up happens under the supervision of a doctor.
| Condition | Intervention |
|---|---|
|
Heavy, Bad Body Odour From Armpit Heavy, Bad Body Odour From Foot |
Biological: Microbial transplant |
| Study Type: | Interventional |
| Study Design: | Allocation: Non-Randomized Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment Masking: Open Label Primary Purpose: Treatment |
| Official Title: | Microbial Community Transplantation on the Armpit/Foot in Order to Reduce the Malodour Generation on Armpit/Foot |
Resource links provided by NLM:
Further study details as provided by University Ghent:
Primary Outcome Measures:
- Change in odour severity after bacterial transplantation [ Time Frame: Baseline and day 1 ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]Odour evaluation by a trained smelling panel.
- Change in odour severity after bacterial transplantation [ Time Frame: Baseline and day 2 ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]Odour evaluation by a trained smelling panel.
- Change in odour severity after bacterial transplantation [ Time Frame: Baseline and day 3 ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]Odour evaluation by a trained smelling panel.
- Change in odour severity after bacterial transplantation [ Time Frame: Baseline and day 4 ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]Odour evaluation by a trained smelling panel.
- Change in odour severity after bacterial transplantation [ Time Frame: Baseline and day 5 ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]Odour evaluation by a trained smelling panel.
- Change in odour severity after bacterial transplantation [ Time Frame: Baseline and week 2 ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]Odour evaluation by a trained smelling panel.
- Change in odour severity after bacterial transplantation [ Time Frame: Baseline and week 3 ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]Odour evaluation by a trained smelling panel.
- Change in odour severity after bacterial transplantation [ Time Frame: Baseline and week 4 ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]Odour evaluation by a trained smelling panel.
- Change in molecular characterisation of the bacterial community. [ Time Frame: Baseline and day 1 ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]Microbial evaluation by means of DNA extraction and Denaturing Gradient Gel Electrophoresis (DGGE).
- Change in molecular characterisation of the bacterial community. [ Time Frame: Baseline and day 2 ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]Microbial evaluation by means of DNA extraction and Denaturing Gradient Gel Electrophoresis (DGGE).
- Change in molecular characterisation of the bacterial community. [ Time Frame: Baseline and day 3 ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]Microbial evaluation by means of DNA extraction and Denaturing Gradient Gel Electrophoresis (DGGE).
- Change in molecular characterisation of the bacterial community. [ Time Frame: Baseline and day 4 ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]Microbial evaluation by means of DNA extraction and Denaturing Gradient Gel Electrophoresis (DGGE).
- Change in molecular characterisation of the bacterial community. [ Time Frame: Baseline and day 5 ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]Microbial evaluation by means of DNA extraction and Denaturing Gradient Gel Electrophoresis (DGGE).
- Change in molecular characterisation of the bacterial community. [ Time Frame: Baseline and week 2 ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]Microbial evaluation by means of DNA extraction and Denaturing Gradient Gel Electrophoresis (DGGE).
- Change in molecular characterisation of the bacterial community. [ Time Frame: Baseline and week 3 ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]Microbial evaluation by means of DNA extraction and Denaturing Gradient Gel Electrophoresis (DGGE).
- Change in molecular characterisation of the bacterial community. [ Time Frame: Baseline and week 4 ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]Microbial evaluation by means of DNA extraction and Denaturing Gradient Gel Electrophoresis (DGGE).
Secondary Outcome Measures:
- Change in odour severity after bacterial transplantation [ Time Frame: Baseline and 2 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]Odour evaluation by a trained smelling panel.
- Change in odour severity after bacterial transplantation [ Time Frame: Baseline and 4 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]Odour evaluation by a trained smelling panel.
- Change in odour severity after bacterial transplantation [ Time Frame: Baseline and 6 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]Odour evaluation by a trained smelling panel.
- Change in molecular characterisation of the bacterial community [ Time Frame: Baseline and 2 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]Microbial evaluation by means of DNA extraction and Denaturing Gradient Gel Electrophoresis (DGGE).
- Change in molecular characterisation of the bacterial community [ Time Frame: Baseline and 4 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]Microbial evaluation by means of DNA extraction and Denaturing Gradient Gel Electrophoresis (DGGE).
- Change in molecular characterisation of the bacterial community [ Time Frame: Baseline and 6 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]Microbial evaluation by means of DNA extraction and Denaturing Gradient Gel Electrophoresis (DGGE).
| Estimated Enrollment: | 20 |
| Study Start Date: | September 2012 |
| Estimated Study Completion Date: | June 2013 |
| Estimated Primary Completion Date: | May 2013 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure) |
| Arms | Assigned Interventions |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Heavy armpit odour
Subjects with heavy armpit odour.
|
Biological: Microbial transplant
Every subjects has 2 armpits and 2 feet. One armpit/foot is treated, the other is not treated.
|
|
Experimental: Heavy foot odour
Subjects with heavy foot odour.
|
Biological: Microbial transplant
Every subjects has 2 armpits and 2 feet. One armpit/foot is treated, the other is not treated.
|
Eligibility| Ages Eligible for Study: | 18 Years to 65 Years |
| Genders Eligible for Study: | Both |
| Accepts Healthy Volunteers: | Yes |
Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- Bad armpit or foot odour
Contacts and Locations
Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01581112
Contacts
| Contact: Chris Callewaert | chris.callewaert@ugent.be |
Locations
| Belgium | |
| Ghent University | Not yet recruiting |
| Ghent, Belgium | |
| Contact: Nico Boon, MD, PhD nico.boon@ugent.be | |
| Principal Investigator: Nico Boon, MD, PhD | |
| Sub-Investigator: Chris Callewaert | |
Sponsors and Collaborators
University Ghent
Investigators
| Principal Investigator: | Jo Lambert, MD, PhD | Ghent University Hospital |
More Information
No publications provided
| Responsible Party: | University Ghent |
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT01581112 History of Changes |
| Other Study ID Numbers: | 2012/256 |
| Study First Received: | April 18, 2012 |
| Last Updated: | April 18, 2012 |
| Health Authority: | Belgium: Ethics Committee |
ClinicalTrials.gov processed this record on May 19, 2013