Effect of Dentifrice Usage Regime on Efficacy of Fluoride in Situ
This study has been completed.
Sponsor:
GlaxoSmithKline
Information provided by (Responsible Party):
GlaxoSmithKline
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT01563172
First received: February 16, 2012
Last updated: January 24, 2013
Last verified: August 2012
- Full Text View
- Tabular View
- No Study Results Posted
- Disclaimer
- How to Read a Study Record
Purpose
This study will evaluate and compare the effect of the amount of toothpaste used and brushing time on enamel strengthening (percent of surface microhardness recovery, % SMHR), enamel fluoride uptake (EFU) and reduction in acid-softening of enamel post-treatment (percent net acid resistance, % NAR).
| Condition | Intervention | Phase |
|---|---|---|
|
Dental Caries |
Drug: Fluoride Toothpaste Drug: Placebo |
Phase 4 |
| Study Type: | Interventional |
| Study Design: | Allocation: Randomized Endpoint Classification: Efficacy Study Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment Masking: Single Blind (Investigator) Primary Purpose: Treatment |
| Official Title: | A Study to Measure the Effect of Dentifrice Usage Regime on Delivery and Efficacy of Fluoride Using an In Situ Caries Model |
Resource links provided by NLM:
Further study details as provided by GlaxoSmithKline:
Primary Outcome Measures:
- Change from baseline in the percentage surface micro harness (% SMH) recovery [ Time Frame: after 14 days of treatment ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]Percentage surface microhardness (% SMH) recovery
- Change from baseline in Enamel Fluoride Uptake [ Time Frame: after 14 days of treatment ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]enamel fluoride uptake (EFU)
- Change from baseline in percentage increase in resistance to acid demineralization [ Time Frame: after 14 days of treatment ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]percentage increase in resistance to acid demineralization (% Net Acid Resistance)
Secondary Outcome Measures:
- Number of participants with treatment-emergent oral soft tissue abnormalities [ Time Frame: after 19 days (including a 5 day follow-up) ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
- Number of participants with adverse events [ Time Frame: after 19 days (including a 5 day follow-up) ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
| Enrollment: | 65 |
| Study Start Date: | January 2009 |
| Study Completion Date: | June 2009 |
| Primary Completion Date: | June 2009 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure) |
| Arms | Assigned Interventions |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: Marketed Toothpaste
1150ppm NaF toothpaste
|
Drug: Fluoride Toothpaste
comparison of different doses of fluoride (1150ppm and 250ppm ) applied for different durations
|
|
Active Comparator: Control Toothpaste
250 ppm NaF toothpaste
|
Drug: Fluoride Toothpaste
comparison of different doses of fluoride (1150ppm and 250ppm ) applied for different durations
|
|
Placebo Comparator: Washout Totothpaste
no active, 0ppm Fluoride toothpaste
|
Drug: Placebo
fluoride-free toothpaste
|
Eligibility| Ages Eligible for Study: | 18 Years to 80 Years |
| Genders Eligible for Study: | Both |
| Accepts Healthy Volunteers: | Yes |
Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
General and Dental Health
- Good general and dental health with (in the opinion of the investigator) no clinically significant and relevant abnormalities of medical history or oral examination
- Have no current active caries or periodontal disease that may compromise the study or the health of the subjects
- Residency: Currently living in the Indianapolis, Indiana area
Dentures:
- Currently wearing a removable mandibular partial denture with sufficient room in the posterior buccal flange area to accommodate two enamel specimens (required dimensions 12 mm x 7 mm)
- Willing to have their denture modified to accommodate enamel test specimens and willing and capable of wearing their removable mandibular partial dentures 24 hours per day during the experimental periods
- All restorations in a good state of repair
- Salivary Flow: Have a salivary flow rate in the range of normal values (unstimulated whole saliva flow rate ≥ 0.2 mL/minute; gum base stimulated whole saliva flow rate ≥ 0.8 mL/minute)
Exclusion Criteria:
- Antibiotics: Use of antibiotics two weeks prior to a treatment visit or anticipated use during the study treatment periods
- Study Scale Use: Subjects unable to measure product weights accurately using the assigned study scale as determined by the study staff (as demonstrated on or before Visit 4)
- A member of the site study staff who is directly working on the project or living in that staff's household
- Any employee of any toothpaste manufacturer or their spouse or family member
Contacts and Locations
Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01563172
Locations
| United States, Indiana | |
| Indiana University School of Dentistry | |
| Indianapolis, Indiana, United States, 46202 | |
Sponsors and Collaborators
GlaxoSmithKline
Investigators
| Study Director: | GSK Clinical Trials | GlaxoSmithKline |
More Information
No publications provided
| Responsible Party: | GlaxoSmithKline |
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT01563172 History of Changes |
| Other Study ID Numbers: | T3158587 |
| Study First Received: | February 16, 2012 |
| Last Updated: | January 24, 2013 |
| Health Authority: | United States: Food and Drug Administration |
Additional relevant MeSH terms:
|
Dental Caries Tooth Demineralization Tooth Diseases Stomatognathic Diseases Fluorides |
Cariostatic Agents Protective Agents Physiological Effects of Drugs Pharmacologic Actions |
ClinicalTrials.gov processed this record on May 16, 2013