Training Improves Balance Control
- Full Text View
- Tabular View
- No Study Results Posted
- Disclaimer
- How to Read a Study Record
Purpose
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of a group-based functional and specific balance training program on balance function in healthy older adults. It is commonly considered difficult to improve balance function in healthy older adults. The program included dual-task exercises; physical training exercises and a cognitive task (e.g. reading or reciting a story) performed simultaneously, as well as perturbation exercises, where balance is challenged in unexpected ways.
The investigators hypothesized that following the proposed training, older adults would improve their speed of taking a step in both single and dual task conditions, refine their ability to control balance when standing still and improve their self-reported physical function.
| Condition | Intervention |
|---|---|
|
Accidental Falls |
Other: Balance Training Intervention |
| Study Type: | Interventional |
| Study Design: | Allocation: Randomized Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment Masking: Single Blind (Outcomes Assessor) Primary Purpose: Treatment |
| Official Title: | Improving Balance Control and Self-Reported Lower Extremity Function in Community Dwelling Older Adults - A Randomized Control Study |
- Reaction time of dual task step execution [ Time Frame: 12 weeks ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]Subjects stand on a force platform and are asked to execute a step as rapidly as possible following a tactile stimulus on their heel while performing a cognitive attention demanding task (Stroop task - call out colors of words that are names of colors, e.g. the word "BLUE" is presented in yellow letters).
- Late Life Functional Disability Index - LLFDI [ Time Frame: 12 weeks ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]Self-reported measure of function
| Enrollment: | 66 |
| Study Start Date: | October 2001 |
| Study Completion Date: | August 2003 |
| Primary Completion Date: | February 2003 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure) |
| Arms | Assigned Interventions |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Balance Training Intervention
The Balance Training Intervention group received 24 training sessions over three months that included perturbation as well as dual-task exercises.
|
Other: Balance Training Intervention
The intervention group participated in a total of 24 one-hour training sessions over a period of 12 weeks. The training program utilized different size balls as a general tool in a series of progressively more difficult exercises targeting sitting, standing, and gait-related balance control. The program included exercises at five different levels of progressively more challenging balance exercises. Levels 1-4 focused on voluntarily controlled balance exercises, whereas level 5 also included perturbation exercises to trigger automatic compensatory stepping responses. All levels included attention-demanding dual task exercises that required subjects to simultaneously perform motor and cognitive activities.
|
| No Intervention: Reference Group |
Other: Balance Training Intervention
The intervention group participated in a total of 24 one-hour training sessions over a period of 12 weeks. The training program utilized different size balls as a general tool in a series of progressively more difficult exercises targeting sitting, standing, and gait-related balance control. The program included exercises at five different levels of progressively more challenging balance exercises. Levels 1-4 focused on voluntarily controlled balance exercises, whereas level 5 also included perturbation exercises to trigger automatic compensatory stepping responses. All levels included attention-demanding dual task exercises that required subjects to simultaneously perform motor and cognitive activities.
|
Eligibility| Ages Eligible for Study: | 65 Years and older |
| Genders Eligible for Study: | Both |
| Accepts Healthy Volunteers: | Yes |
Inclusion Criteria:
- 65 years or older
- Independently ambulatory (cane acceptable; not walker)
- Score better than 45 on the Berg Balance Scale
- Higher than 24 Mini-Mental Score
Exclusion Criteria:
- Severe focal muscle weakness or visual impairment
- Known neurological disorders (including stroke, Parkinson disease)
- Metastatic cancer
- Use of medication that impairs balance or strength
Contacts and Locations| United States, Massachusetts | |
| NeuroMuscular Research Center, Boston University | |
| Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02215 | |
| Principal Investigator: | Lars IE Oddsson, PhD | NeuroMuscular Research Center, Boston University |
More Information
Publications:
| Responsible Party: | Boston University |
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT01547988 History of Changes |
| Other Study ID Numbers: | RRF 2001-056 |
| Study First Received: | February 29, 2012 |
| Last Updated: | March 5, 2012 |
| Health Authority: | United States: Institutional Review Board |
Keywords provided by Boston University:
|
Aging Falls Balance Control |
Voluntary Step Execution Test Dual-Task Self-reported function |
ClinicalTrials.gov processed this record on June 18, 2013