Trial record 1 of 2 for:
Dose-Response of Manipulation for Cervicogenic Headache
Cervicogenic Headache Dose-Response (CGH D-R)
This study is currently recruiting participants.
Verified May 2013 by University of Western States
Sponsor:
University of Western States
Collaborator:
Information provided by (Responsible Party):
Mitchell Haas, University of Western States
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT01530321
First received: February 2, 2012
Last updated: May 3, 2013
Last verified: May 2013
- Full Text View
- Tabular View
- No Study Results Posted
- Disclaimer
- How to Read a Study Record
Purpose
This study will determine the number of visits to a chiropractor for spinal manipulation and light massage necessary for the optimal relief of cervicogenic headache (headache with associated neck pain). Effectiveness of care will also be determined.
| Condition | Intervention | Phase |
|---|---|---|
|
Cervicogenic Headache |
Other: Spinal Manipulation Other: Light Massage |
Phase 1 Phase 2 |
| Study Type: | Interventional |
| Study Design: | Allocation: Randomized Endpoint Classification: Efficacy Study Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment Masking: Open Label Primary Purpose: Treatment |
| Official Title: | Dose-Response of Manipulation for Cervicogenic Headache |
Resource links provided by NLM:
Further study details as provided by University of Western States:
Primary Outcome Measures:
- Headache days change from baseline for cervicogenic headache [ Time Frame: 0, 6, 12, 24, 39, 52 weeks ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]Days with cervicogenic headache in the last four weeks from a daily headache diary. Change score = follow-up score - baseline score)
Secondary Outcome Measures:
- Average pain change from baseline for cervicogenic headache [ Time Frame: 0, 6, 12, 24, 39, 52 weeks ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]Average cervicogenic headache pain in the last four weeks evaluated by averaging daily headache diary pain scores. Pain is rated on a 0 to 11 numeric rating scale.
- Headache-related disability change from baseline for cervicogenic headaches [ Time Frame: 0, 6, 12, 24, 39, 52 weeks ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]Headache Impact Test (HIT-6)
- Headache-related disability days change from baseline [ Time Frame: 0, 6, 12, 24, 39, 52 weeks ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]Number of days in the last four weeks from recall unable to carry out daily work for at least one half day because of cervicogenic headache.
- EuroQol-5D change from baseline [ Time Frame: 0, 12, 24, 39, 52 weeks ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]Health-related quality of life
- Average pain change from baseline for neck [ Time Frame: 0, 6, 12, 24, 39, 52 weeks ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]Average neck pain in the last four weeks from recall. Pain is rated on a 0 to 11 numeric rating scale.
- Neck pain days change from baseline [ Time Frame: 0, 6, 12, 24, 39, 52 weeks ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]Number of days with neck pain in last 4 weeks from recall.
- medication use change from baseline [ Time Frame: 0, 6, 12, 24, 39, 52 weeks ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]Number days of use of prescription and nonprescription medications for headaches with neck pain
- Outside Care change from baseline [ Time Frame: 0, 6, 12, 24, 39, 52 weeks ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]Visits to providers outside the study for care of cervicogenic headache. Includes hospital and emergency room visits
- Patient Satisfaction [ Time Frame: week 12 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]Likert scale for success of care
- Objective biomechanical measures change from baseline [ Time Frame: 0, 6 weeks ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]Measures of cervical joint function and kinematics including global range of motion, spinal segmental joint restriction, pain pressure thresholds
- Quality-adjusted life years change from baseline [ Time Frame: 0, 12, 24, 39, 52 weeks ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]utility for cost-effectiveness analysis
- Direct & Indirect costs change from baseline [ Time Frame: 0, 6, 12, 24, 39, 52 weeks ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]Health services; lost work days and productivity
- Perceived headache average pain change from baseline for cervicogenic headache [ Time Frame: 0, 6, 12, 24, 39, 52 weeks ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]Perceived change in average pain from baseline on a -10 to +10 (21-point) numeric rating scale
- Perceived headache improvement from baseline for cervicogenic headache [ Time Frame: 0, 6, 12, 24, 39, 52 weeks ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]Perceived cervicogenic headache improvement from baseline on a 9-point Likert-like scale.
| Estimated Enrollment: | 256 |
| Study Start Date: | August 2012 |
| Estimated Study Completion Date: | March 2015 |
| Estimated Primary Completion Date: | March 2015 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure) |
| Arms | Assigned Interventions |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: High dose spinal manipulation
18 visits for spinal manipulation
|
Other: Spinal Manipulation
5 minutes of high velocity, low amplitude thrust to cervical and upper thoracic spine.
|
|
Experimental: Moderate dose spinal manipulation
12 visits for spinal manipulation and 6 visits for light massage
|
Other: Spinal Manipulation
5 minutes of high velocity, low amplitude thrust to cervical and upper thoracic spine.
Other: Light Massage
5 minutes of light pressure massage to the neck and upper back
|
|
Experimental: Low dose spinal manipulation
6 visits for spinal manipulation and 12 visits for light massage
|
Other: Spinal Manipulation
5 minutes of high velocity, low amplitude thrust to cervical and upper thoracic spine.
Other: Light Massage
5 minutes of light pressure massage to the neck and upper back
|
|
High dose massage
18 visits for light massage
|
Other: Light Massage
5 minutes of light pressure massage to the neck and upper back
|
Eligibility| Ages Eligible for Study: | 18 Years and older |
| Genders Eligible for Study: | Both |
| Accepts Healthy Volunteers: | No |
Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- chronic cervicogenic headache
- threshold pain level
- threshold headache frequency
- independently ambulatory
- English literate
- candidate for spinal manipulation
Exclusion Criteria:
- contraindication to thrust spinal manipulation or massage
- most other headache types
- Recent manual/exercise therapy from licensed provider for head/neck
- threshold pain medication use
- pregnancy
- involvement with another pain study
- suspicion of unmanaged depression
- most cancers
- hypertension (at least stage II)
- complicating neurological/spinal conditions
- pre-randomization noncompliance or cannot/will not comply with protocols
- health-related litigation, claims, or disability compensation
Contacts and Locations
Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01530321
Locations
| United States, Minnesota | |
| Northwestern Health Sciences University | Recruiting |
| Bloomington, Minnesota, United States, 55431 | |
| Contact: Linda Hanson, DC 800-888-4777 ext 316 lhanson@nwhealth.edu | |
| Principal Investigator: Gert Bronfort, DC, PhD | |
| Sub-Investigator: Roni Evans, DC, MS | |
| Sub-Investigator: Craig Schultz, DC, MS | |
| United States, Oregon | |
| University of Western States | Recruiting |
| Portland, Oregon, United States, 97230 | |
| Contact: Sarah Kirkpatrick, BS, MS 800-678-9072 skirkpatrick@uws.edu | |
| Principal Investigator: Mitchell Haas, DC, MA | |
| Sub-Investigator: Darcy Vavrek, ND, MS | |
| Sub-Investigator: David Peterson, DC | |
Sponsors and Collaborators
University of Western States
Investigators
| Principal Investigator: | Mitchell Haas, DC, MA | University of Western States |
| Principal Investigator: | Gert Bronfort, DC, PhD | Northwestern Health Sciences University |
More Information
No publications provided
| Responsible Party: | Mitchell Haas, Associate Vice President of Research, University of Western States |
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT01530321 History of Changes |
| Other Study ID Numbers: | R01AT006330 |
| Study First Received: | February 2, 2012 |
| Last Updated: | May 3, 2013 |
| Health Authority: | United States: Federal Government |
Keywords provided by University of Western States:
|
cervicogenic headache spinal manipulation chiropractic |
randomized controlled trial dose-response efficacy |
Additional relevant MeSH terms:
|
Headache Post-Traumatic Headache Pain Neurologic Manifestations Nervous System Diseases |
Signs and Symptoms Headache Disorders, Secondary Headache Disorders Brain Diseases Central Nervous System Diseases |
ClinicalTrials.gov processed this record on May 21, 2013