The Use of Prophylactic Antibiotics in Isolated Blowout Fractures
The purpose of the research is to perform a quality assurance evaluation using randomized prospective analysis the rate of orbital cellulitis as a complication of nonsurgical orbital blowout fracture in patients treated versus not treated with prophylactic antibiotics.
The investigators goal is to show the use of prophylactic antibiotics in orbital blowout fractures does not significantly decrease the rate of orbital cellulitis and is thus not indicated.
|Study Design:||Allocation: Randomized
Endpoint Classification: Efficacy Study
Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment
Masking: Open Label
Primary Purpose: Prevention
|Official Title:||The Use of Prophylactic Antibiotics in Isolated Blowout Fractures|
- Orbital Cellulitis [ Time Frame: Two weeks ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]The rate of orbital cellulitis as a complication of nonsurgical orbital blowout fracture in patients treated versus not treated with prophylactic antibiotics.
|Study Start Date:||January 2012|
|Study Completion Date:||November 2012|
|Primary Completion Date:||November 2012 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure)|
Adults: ≥40 kg:250mg every eight hours Children: <40kg: 20mg/kg/day divided in three doses (up to 250mg) every eight hours Suspension form 250mg/ml
Other Name: Amoxcillin/cavulanic acid
No Intervention: Non Treatment
Subjects will be followed without the use of antibiotics.
Orbital fractures are a common occurrence in association with a wide variety of blunt trauma injuries to the face. One type of fracture is that involving the orbital floor, or an isolated blowout fracture. One common current practice is to use prophylactic antibiotics in these cases to prevent the theoretical occurrence of an orbital cellulitis originating from sinus flora, though there is no current standard of care regarding this practice. Many surgeons may elect to not use antibiotics for this very reason.
The use of prophylactic antibiotics in isolated blowout fractures where there is no occlusion of the ostium is not defined, and no prospective controlled study has been undertaken to suggest the most appropriate course of action to take. Our goal in this study is to determine a correct course of action for these patients.
Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01504568
|United States, Arkansas|
|University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences|
|Little Rock, Arkansas, United States, 72205|
|Principal Investigator:||Christopher Westfall, M.D.||University of Arkansas|
|Principal Investigator:||Bradley Thuro, M.D.||University of Arkansas|
|Principal Investigator:||John Pemberton, D.O.||University of Arkansas|