Examination of the Effectiveness of Diffusion Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Identifying Poor Prognosis in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis
- Full Text View
- Tabular View
- No Study Results Posted
- Disclaimer
- How to Read a Study Record
Purpose
Diffusion Weighted Imaging (DWI) MRI will assist in differentiating poor prognosis bone oedema more effectively than traditional T2 weighted MRI in patients with early Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA).
| Condition |
|---|
|
Rheumatoid Arthritis |
| Study Type: | Observational |
| Study Design: | Observational Model: Cohort Time Perspective: Prospective |
| Official Title: | Examination of the Effectiveness of Diffusion Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Identifying Poor Prognosis in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis |
| Estimated Enrollment: | 20 |
| Study Start Date: | August 2011 |
| Estimated Study Completion Date: | August 2012 |
Assess DWI MRI in patients with early Rheumatoid Arthritis to determine whether the MRI method will assist in differentiating poor prognosis bone oedema more effectively than traditional T2 weighted MRI.
Aim 1: To compare DWI MRI with T2 weighted MRI for the discrimination of different types of bone oedema lesions in patients with early RA.
Aim 2: To examine the association between the presence of different types of bone oedema lesions detected on DWI MRI and T2 weighted MRI and the development of subsequent joint bone erosion as detected on i) MRI and ii) standard plain radiographs.
Eligibility| Ages Eligible for Study: | 18 Years and older |
| Genders Eligible for Study: | Both |
| Accepts Healthy Volunteers: | No |
| Sampling Method: | Probability Sample |
Newly diagnosed Patients with active Rheumatoid Arthritis
Inclusion Criteria:
- Subject has Rheumatoid Arthritis as defined by the ACR/Eular criteria
- Subject is able to understand and comply with study protocol
- Active disease as defined by DAS28> 3.0
- Disease duration less than 12 months
- If female, subject is either not of childbearing potential, or is of childbearing potential and is practicing an approved method of birth control throughout the study
- subject is judged to be in good health as determined by the PI based upon results of medical history, laboratory profile and physical examination.
- Prednisone dose 10mg or less, dose stable for 28 days prior to baseline
Exclusion Criteria:
- Inflammatory arthropathy other than Rheumatoid Arthritis
- Inactive disease as evidenced by DAS 28 CRP and / or ESR < 2.5
- Prednisone dose greater than 10mg within 28 days prior to baseline
- Intra-articular steroid within 28 days prior to baseline visit
- IV Methyl-prednisone within 28 days prior to baseline visit
- Any contra-indication to Magnetic Resonance Imaging
- Permanent Pacemaker
- Intracerebral aneurysm clip
- Claustrophobia to the extent that patient cannot manage MRI investigations
- Implanted metallic device
- Cochlear implant
Contacts and Locations| Australia, New South Wales | |
| Optimus Clinical Research | Recruiting |
| Kogarah, New South Wales, Australia, 2217 | |
| Contact: Wendy Gellatley 61 2 95870238 wgellatley@optimusresearch.com.au | |
| Principal Investigator: Paul Bird, Dr | |
| Principal Investigator: | Paul Bird, Dr | Optimus Clinical Research |
More Information
No publications provided
| Responsible Party: | Paul Bird, Principal Investigator, Optimus Clinical Research |
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT01482507 History of Changes |
| Other Study ID Numbers: | IMM 10-0120 (DWI101) |
| Study First Received: | November 27, 2011 |
| Last Updated: | November 29, 2011 |
| Health Authority: | Australia: Department of Health and Ageing Therapeutic Goods Administration Australia: Human Research Ethics Committee |
Additional relevant MeSH terms:
|
Arthritis Arthritis, Rheumatoid Joint Diseases Musculoskeletal Diseases |
Rheumatic Diseases Connective Tissue Diseases Autoimmune Diseases Immune System Diseases |
ClinicalTrials.gov processed this record on May 19, 2013