OPTIMAL>60, Improvement of Therapy of Elderly Patients With CD20+ DLBCL Using Rituximab Optimized and Liposomal Vincristine
- Full Text View
- Tabular View
- No Study Results Posted
- Disclaimer
- How to Read a Study Record
Purpose
The purpose of this study is to improve the outcome of elderly patients with CD20+ Aggressive B-Cell Lymphoma and to reduce the toxicity of standard used Immuno-Chemotherapy by using an optimised schedule of the monoclonal antibody Rituximab, substituting conventional by Liposomal Vincristine and by a PET-guided reduction of therapy.
| Condition | Intervention | Phase |
|---|---|---|
|
CD20+ Aggressive B-Cell Lymphoma |
Drug: Conventional Vincristine Drug: Liposomal Vincristine Drug: Ricover-scheme rituximab Drug: optimised rituximab-schedule |
Phase 3 |
| Study Type: | Interventional |
| Study Design: | Allocation: Randomized Endpoint Classification: Efficacy Study Intervention Model: Factorial Assignment Masking: Open Label Primary Purpose: Treatment |
| Official Title: | Improvement of Outcome and Reduction of Toxicity in Elderly Patients With CD20+ Aggressive B-Cell Lymphoma by an Optimised Schedule of the Monoclonal Antibody Rituximab, Substitution of Conventional by Liposomal Vincristine, and FDG-PET Based Reduction of Therapy. |
- Progression-free survival [ Time Frame: 9 years ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
"OPTIMAL>60 Less Favourable": To test the effects of substitution of conventional by liposomal vincristine and of a 2-week applications of 8x rituximab by an optimised application of 12 x rituximab stratified log rank tests will be performed for each question (stratified for IPI-factors). Proportional hazard models will be used to investigate treatment interaction and to obtain estimates for the single treatment effects (HR) adjusting for the IPI-factors.
"OPTIMAL>60 Favourable" Grade of neurotoxicity will be estimated and indicated with a 95% confidence interval (CI) separated to each type of vincristine. To investigate the 3-year PFS with 95% CI the Kaplan-Meier estimator will be used.
- for efficacy: rate of complete remissions (CR-rate), rate of partial responses (PR-rate), rate of primary progressions, relapse rate, event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS); rate and CTC grades of polyneuropathy. [ Time Frame: 9 years ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
Secondary endpoints: To analyze how (i. e. in which direction) and how often a pre-treatment FDG-PET-based assignment (PET-0) would have affected the assignment of a patient to a different stage, IPI risk group or treatment, respectively.
To compare the efficacy and side effects of the (post-induction therapy FDG-PET-based) individualised treatment strategy in OPTIMAL>60 with the fixed (pre-defined) treatment strategy in RICOVER-60.
Rates and grades of polyneuropathy will be determined according to CTC-v4.03
| Estimated Enrollment: | 1152 |
| Study Start Date: | November 2011 |
| Estimated Study Completion Date: | October 2019 |
| Estimated Primary Completion Date: | October 2016 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure) |
| Arms | Assigned Interventions |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: Favourable Prognosis F-A
Induction therapy with 4 cycles of R-CHOP-14 (Rituximab 375 mg/sqm, Cyclophosphamide 750 mg/sqm, Doxorubicin 50 mg/sqm, conventional Vincristine 1,4 mg/sqm [max. 2mg absolute], Predniso[lo]ne 100mg/d d1-5) and then definitive (post-induction) restaging with FDG-PET. If FDG-PET positive 2 additional cycles of R-CHOP-14 + 2xR plus additional involved-site radiotherapy, if FDG-PET negative only 4xR without radiotherapy.
|
Drug: Conventional Vincristine |
|
Experimental: Favourable F-B
Induction therapy with 4 cycles of R-CHLIP-14 (Rituximab 375 mg/sqm, Cyclophosphamide 750 mg/sqm, Doxorubicin 50 mg/sqm, liposomal Vincristine 2 mg/sqm, Predniso[lo]ne 100mg/d d1-5) and then definitive (post-induction) restaging with FDG-PET. If FDG-PET positive 2 additional cycles of R-CHLIP-14 + 2xR plus additional involved-site radiotherapy, if FDG-PET negative only 4xR without radiotherapy.
|
Drug: Liposomal Vincristine |
|
Active Comparator: Less Favourable LF-A
Induction therapy with 6 cycles of R-CHOP-14 (Rituximab 375 mg/sqm, Cyclophosphamide 750 mg/sqm, Doxorubicin 50 mg/sqm, conventional Vincristine 1,4 mg/sqm [max. 2mg absolute], Predniso[lo]ne 100mg/d d1-5) and then definitive (post-induction) restaging with FDG-PET. If FDG-PET positive 2xR plus additional radiotherapy to the initial bulky region, if FDG-PET negative only 2xR without radiotherapy. After 3xR-CHOP-14 an interim restaging will be performed.
|
Drug: Conventional Vincristine Drug: Ricover-scheme rituximab |
|
Experimental: Less Favourable LF-B
Induction therapy with 6 cycles of R-CHLIP-14 (Rituximab 375 mg/sqm, Cyclophosphamide 750 mg/sqm, Doxorubicin 50 mg/sqm, liposomal Vincristine 2 mg/sqm, Predniso[lo]ne 100mg/d d1-5) and then definitive (post-induction) restaging with FDG-PET. If FDG-PET positive 2xR plus additional radiotherapy to the initial bulky region, if FDG-PET negative only 2xR without radiotherapy. After 3xR-CHLIP-14 an interim restaging will be performed.
|
Drug: Liposomal Vincristine Drug: Ricover-scheme rituximab |
|
Experimental: Less Favourable LF-C
Induction therapy with 6 cycles of CHOP-14 (Cyclophosphamide 750 mg/sqm, Doxorubicin 50 mg/sqm, conventional Vincristine 1,4 mg/sqm [max. 2mg absolute], Predniso[lo]ne 100mg/d d1-5) combined with an optimized Rituximab-schedule (375 mg/sqm, d-4, d-1, d1, d4, d14, d28, d42, d56, d91, d126, d175, d238) and then definitive (post-induction) restaging with FDG-PET. If FDG-PET positive additional radiotherapy to the initial bulky region, if FDG-PET negative omission of radiotherapy. After 3x CHOP-14 an interim restaging will be performed.
|
Drug: Conventional Vincristine Drug: optimised rituximab-schedule |
|
Experimental: Less Favourable LF-D
Induction therapy with 6 cycles of CHLIP-14 (Cyclophosphamide 750 mg/sqm, Doxorubicin 50 mg/sqm, liposomal Vincristine 2 mg/sqm, Predniso[lo]ne 100mg/d d1-5) combined with an optimised Rituximab-schedule (375 mg/sqm, d-4, d-1, d1, d4, d14, d28, d42, d56, d91, d126, d175, d238) and then definitive (post-induction) restaging with FDG-PET. If FDG-PET positive additional radiotherapy to the initial bulky region, if FDG-PET negative omission of radiotherapy. After 3x CHLIP-14 an interim restaging will be performed.
|
Drug: Liposomal Vincristine Drug: optimised rituximab-schedule |
Detailed Description:
Primary objective of study:
"OPTIMAL>60 Less Favourable" Patients with less favourable prognosis:
- To test whether progression-free survival (PFS) can be improved by substituting conventional by liposomal vincristine;
To test whether PFS can be improved by 12 optimised applications instead of 8 2-week applications of rituximab.
"OPTIMAL>60 Favourable": Patients with favourable pro-gnosis:
- Comparison of neurotoxicity of conventional and liposomal vincristine;
Determination of PFS for the treatment strategy of reducing treatment in patients with negative FDG-PET after 4 x R-CHOP/CHLIP-14 (PET-4) and comparison with the corresponding patient population in RICOVER-60.
Secondary objectives:
"OPTIMAL>60 Favourable" and "OPTIMAL>60 Less Favourable":
- Comparison of the prognostic value of a pre-treatment FDG-PET (PET-0) with conventional CT/MRT.
- Comparison of the FDG-PET-based individualised treatment strategy in OPTIMAL>60 with the fixed (pre-defined) treatment strategy in RICOVER>60.
- Estimation of the vincristine-related neurotoxicity ("OPTIMAL>60 Less Favourable only, since vincristine related neurotoxicity is primary objective of the study in favourable patients) and other toxicities (all patients).
Eligibility| Ages Eligible for Study: | 61 Years to 80 Years |
| Genders Eligible for Study: | Both |
| Accepts Healthy Volunteers: | No |
Inclusion Criteria:
- Age: 61-80 years
- All risk groups (IPI 1-5)
Diagnosis of aggressive CD20+ B-NHL, based on an excisional biopsy of a lymph node or on an appropriate sample of a lymph node or of an extranodal involvement. It will be possible to treat the following entities in this study as defined by the new WHO classification of 200870:
B-NHL:
- Foll. lymphoma grade IIIb
DLBCL, not otherwise specified (NOS)
common morphologic variants:
- centroblastic
- immunoblastic
- anaplastic
- rare morphologic variants
DLBCL subtypes/entities:
- T-cell/histiocyte-rich large B-cell lymphoma
- primary cutaneous DLBCL, leg type
- EBV-pos. DLBCL of the elderly
- DLBCL associated with chronic inflammation
- primary mediastinal (thymic) LBCL
- intravascular large B-cell-lymphoma
- ALK-positive large B-cell-lymphoma
- plasmoblastic lymphoma
- primary effusion lymphoma
- secondary or simultaneous high grade B-cell-lymphoma
- B-cell lymphoma, unclassifiable, with features intermediate between DLBCL and Burkitt lymphoma
- B-cell lymphoma, unclassifiable, with features intermediate between DLCBL and Hodgkin lymphoma
- Performance status ECOG 0 - 2 after prephase treatment. The performance status of each patient must be assessed before the initiation and after the end of prephase treatment which, as experience has shown, can result in a significant improvement of the patient's performance status. The pre-treatment performance status which can range from ECOG 0 to ECOG 4 must be documented in the Staging CRF (see ISF); the performance status after the prephase treatment must be documented in the respective Prephase Treatment CRF (PT form: see ISF). A definition of the performance status is provided in Appendix 28.10.
- Written informed consent of the patient
- Contract of participation signed by the study centre and sponsor
Exclusion Criteria:
- Already initiated lymphoma therapy (except for the prephase treatment)
Serious accompanying disorder or impaired organ function (except when due to lymphoma involvement), in particular:
- heart: angina pectoris CCS >2, cardiac failure e.g. NYHA >2 and/or EF <50% or FS<25% in nuclear medicine examination/echocardiography
- lungs: if respiratory problems are suspected the patient is to be excluded if the resultant pulmonary function test shows FeV1<50% or a diffusion capacity <50% of the reference values
- kidneys: creatinine >2 times the upper reference limit
- liver: bilirubin >2 times the upper reference limit, aspartate transaminase (AST, SGOT) or alanine transaminase (ALT, SGPT) >3 x institutional upper reference limit
- uncontrollable diabetes mellitus (prephase treatment with predniso[lo]ne!)
- Platelets <75 000/mm3, leukocytes <2 500/mm3 (if not due to lymphoma)
- Known hypersensitivity to the medications to be used
- Known HIV-positivity
- Patients with severe impairment of immune defense
- Patients with constipation with imminent risk of ileus
- Chronic active hepatitis
- Poor patient compliance
- Simultaneous participation in other treatment studies or in another clinical trial within the last 6 months
- Prior chemo- or radiotherapy, long-term use of corticosteroids or anti-neoplastic drugs for previous disorder
- Other concomitant tumour disease and/or tumour disease in the past 5 years (except basalioma of the skin and carcinoma in situ)
- CNS involvement of lymphoma (intracerebral, meningeal, intraspinal intradural) or primary CNS lymphoma
- Persistent neuropathy grade ≥2 (NCI CTC-AE v4.03) (unless due to lymphoma involvement)
- History of persistent active neurologic disorders grade >2 including demyelinating form of Charcot-Marie-Tooth syndrome, acquired demyelinating disorders, or other demyelinating condition
- Pregnancy or breast-feeding women
- Active serious infections not controlled by oral and/or intravenous antibiotics or anti-fungal medication
- Any medical condition which in the opinion of the investigator places the subject at an unacceptably high risk for toxicities.
- MALT lymphoma
- Non-conformity to eligibility criteria
- Persons not able to understand the impact, nature, risks and consequences of the trial (including language barrier)
- Persons not agreeing to the transmission of their pseudonymous data
- Persons depending on sponsor or investigator
- Persons from highly protected groups. Pts. with CNS lymphoma should not be included in this study.
Contacts and Locations| Contact: DSHNHL Central Study Office | +4968411623084 | DSHNHL@uks.eu |
Show 51 Study Locations| Principal Investigator: | Michael G. Pfreundschuh, Professor | Saarland University, Saarland University Hospital |
More Information
No publications provided
| Responsible Party: | University Hospital, Saarland |
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT01478542 History of Changes |
| Other Study ID Numbers: | DSHNHL 2009-1 |
| Study First Received: | November 18, 2011 |
| Last Updated: | October 16, 2012 |
| Health Authority: | Germany: Ethics Commission Germany: Federal Institute for Drugs and Medical Devices |
Keywords provided by University Hospital, Saarland:
|
DLBCL Liposomal Vincristine (Marqibo) Optimised Rituximab Toxicity Elderly Patients |
FDG-PET Bulky Disease Radiation age >60 years First line Therapy |
Additional relevant MeSH terms:
|
Aggression Lymphoma Lymphoma, B-Cell Behavioral Symptoms Neoplasms by Histologic Type Neoplasms Lymphoproliferative Disorders Lymphatic Diseases Immunoproliferative Disorders Immune System Diseases Lymphoma, Non-Hodgkin Vincristine |
Rituximab Tubulin Modulators Antimitotic Agents Mitosis Modulators Molecular Mechanisms of Pharmacological Action Pharmacologic Actions Antineoplastic Agents, Phytogenic Antineoplastic Agents Therapeutic Uses Immunologic Factors Physiological Effects of Drugs Antirheumatic Agents |
ClinicalTrials.gov processed this record on May 23, 2013