Family Planning-based Partner Abuse Intervention to Reduce Unintended Pregnancy
- Full Text View
- Tabular View
- No Study Results Posted
- Disclaimer
- How to Read a Study Record
Purpose
This is a community-based participatory study to test a brief intervention to reduce risk for intimate partner violence (IPV) and associated unintended pregnancy among young, medically underserved women attending family planning (FP) clinics. Women ages 16-29 years utilizing FP clinics report higher rates of IPV compared to their same-age peers, experiences associated with unintended pregnancy. A critical mechanism connecting IPV with poor reproductive health is abusive partners' control of women's reproduction through condom refusal, pressuring women to get pregnant, and birth control sabotage, a phenomenon described as reproductive coercion. In the investigative team's pilot intervention study 53% of young women using FP clinics reported ever experiencing IPV, and 25% reported reproductive coercion, the combination of which was strongly associated with unintended pregnancy. The proposed reproductive coercion/partner violence intervention was developed collaboratively by community-based practitioners, advocates, and researchers, with significant input from FP clients. Designed to be implemented within routine FP care, maximizing feasibility and sustainability of this program, the intervention provides 1) client education and assessment regarding IPV and reproductive coercion; 2) discussion of harm reduction behaviors to reduce risk for unintended pregnancy and IPV victimization, and 3) supported referrals to IPV victim services. This is a full-scale RCT to assess the effects of this innovative program on IPV, reproductive coercion and unintended pregnancy, major health threats for medically underserved women. Evaluation of this intervention will involve random assignment of 25 FP clinics (unit of randomization) in Western PA to either intervention or control (i.e., standard-of-care) conditions. Female FP clients ages 16-29 (N=3600) will be assessed at baseline, 12-20 weeks (FU1), and 12 months (FU2) to assess intervention effects on knowledge and behaviors related to IPV, reproductive coercion and related harm reduction, as well as unintended pregnancy. Data will be collected via audio computer-assisted self-interview in English or Spanish. Chart extraction will track clinic utilization, pregnancy testing, and diagnosed pregnancies. Regression models appropriate for longitudinal data from cluster-randomized trials will be used to estimate intervention effects.
| Condition | Intervention | Phase |
|---|---|---|
|
Violence Pregnancy |
Behavioral: Family Planning-based Partner Violence Intervention |
Phase 3 |
| Study Type: | Interventional |
| Study Design: | Allocation: Randomized Endpoint Classification: Efficacy Study Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment Masking: Open Label Primary Purpose: Prevention |
| Official Title: | Family Planning-based Partner Abuse Intervention to Reduce Unintended Pregnancy |
- Change in partner violence victimization (summary score) [ Time Frame: baseline to 12 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]baseline-adjusted differences in post-intervention partner violence victimization up to 12 months {pooled analysis of FU 1 (12-20 weeks) and FU 2 (12 month) score}
- Change in reproductive coercion (summary score) [ Time Frame: baseline to12 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]baseline-adjusted differences in post-intervention levels of reproductive coercion up to 12 months {pooled analysis of FU 1 (12-20 weeks) and FU 2 (12 month) score}
- Unintended pregnancy [ Time Frame: 12 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]incidence of unintended pregnancy
- Change in recognition of abusive behaviors (mean score) [ Time Frame: baseline to 12 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]baseline-adjusted differences in mean post-intervention levels of recognition of what constitutes abusive behavior up to 12 months {pooled analysis of FU 1 (12-20 weeks) and FU 2 (12 month) score}
- Change in harm reduction self-efficacy (mean score) [ Time Frame: baseline to 12 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]baseline-adjusted differences in mean post-intervention levels of self-efficacy regarding uptake of harm reduction strategies up to 12 months {pooled analysis of FU 1 (12-20 weeks) and FU 2 (12 month) score}
- Knowledge regarding violence victimization resources [ Time Frame: up to 12 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]post-intervention levels of knowledge about violence victimization related resources up to 12 months {pooled analysis of FU 1 (12-20 weeks) and FU 2 (12 month) score}
- Harm reduction strategies uptake (summary score) [ Time Frame: up to 12 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]post-intervention levels of uptake of harm reduction strategies up to 12 months {pooled analysis of FU 1 (12-20 weeks) and FU 2 (12 month) score}
| Estimated Enrollment: | 3600 |
| Study Start Date: | October 2011 |
| Estimated Study Completion Date: | September 2015 |
| Estimated Primary Completion Date: | March 2013 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure) |
| Arms | Assigned Interventions |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Clinics trained in brief intervention
Female clients ages 16-29 seeking care in 11 reproductive health clinics in Western Pennsylvania where clinic providers are trained to implement the brief partner violence/reproductive coercion intervention.
|
Behavioral: Family Planning-based Partner Violence Intervention
The intervention includes three major components:
|
|
No Intervention: Control sites providing standard of care
Female clients ages 16-29 seeking care in 14 reproductive health clinics in Western Pennsylvania where clinic providers are providing standard domestic violence screening per usual standard of care.
|
Behavioral: Family Planning-based Partner Violence Intervention
The intervention includes three major components:
|
Eligibility| Ages Eligible for Study: | 16 Years to 29 Years |
| Genders Eligible for Study: | Female |
| Accepts Healthy Volunteers: | Yes |
Inclusion:
- female clients
- ages 16-29
- English or Spanish speaking
- able to provide their own consent
- plan to be in area for the next 12 months
- willing to be contacted for follow up survey and able to provide additional contact information
Exclusion Criteria:
- female clients not of the specified age range
- neither English nor Spanish speaking
- clients who are intoxicated or otherwise not able to provide their own consent
Contacts and Locations| Contact: Elizabeth Miller, M.D., Ph.D. | 412-692-8504 | elizabeth.miller@chp.edu |
| Contact: Heather A Anderson, B.S. | 412-692-5278 | heather.anderson@chp.edu |
| United States, Pennsylvania | |
| Western Pennsylvania Family Planning Clinics | Recruiting |
| Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States, 15213 | |
| Principal Investigator: | Elizabeth Miller, M.D., Ph.D. | University of Pittsburgh |
More Information
Publications:
| Responsible Party: | Elizabeth Miller, Chief of Adolescent Medicine, University of Pittsburgh |
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT01459458 History of Changes |
| Other Study ID Numbers: | 11050458, NICHD |
| Study First Received: | October 10, 2011 |
| Last Updated: | December 3, 2011 |
| Health Authority: | United States: Institutional Review Board |
Keywords provided by University of Pittsburgh:
|
intimate partner violence gender-based violence domestic violence unintended pregnancy |
ClinicalTrials.gov processed this record on May 16, 2013