VA MERIT: A Comparative Efficacy Study: Treatment of Non-Healing Diabetic Foot Ulcers (DOLCE)
This study is currently recruiting participants.
Verified October 2011 by VA Northern California Health Care System
Sponsor:
VA Northern California Health Care System
Information provided by (Responsible Party):
Rivkah Isseroff, VA Northern California Health Care System
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT01450943
First received: October 7, 2011
Last updated: October 12, 2011
Last verified: October 2011
- Full Text View
- Tabular View
- No Study Results Posted
- Disclaimer
- How to Read a Study Record
Purpose
The primary objective of this study is to assess the effectiveness of cellular dermal replacement tissue vs. non-viable extracellular matrix (ECM) for the treatment of non-healing diabetic foot ulcers. Our hypothesis is that these devices are of equal efficacy.
| Condition | Intervention |
|---|---|
|
Diabetic Foot Ulcer |
Device: SECONDARY dressing gauze and tape Procedure: debridement, irrigation Device: Dermagraft™ Device: Oasis™ |
| Study Type: | Interventional |
| Study Design: | Allocation: Randomized Endpoint Classification: Efficacy Study Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment Masking: Single Blind (Outcomes Assessor) Primary Purpose: Treatment |
| Official Title: | A Comparative Efficacy Study: Treatment of Non-Healing Diabetic Foot |
Resource links provided by NLM:
Further study details as provided by VA Northern California Health Care System:
Primary Outcome Measures:
- Wound closure by week 12 [ Time Frame: 12 weeks ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
Secondary Outcome Measures:
- Wound closure at 20 weeks [ Time Frame: 20 weeks ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- Cost effectiveness [ Time Frame: 12 weeks ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
| Estimated Enrollment: | 171 |
| Study Start Date: | October 2011 |
| Estimated Primary Completion Date: | October 2014 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure) |
| Arms | Assigned Interventions |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: Standard of care
debridement, irrigation , PRIMARY dressing Adaptic® and Iodosorb, SECONDARY dressing gauze and tape
|
Device: SECONDARY dressing gauze and tape
SECONDARY dressing gauze and tape
Procedure: debridement, irrigation
debridement, irrigation
|
|
Experimental: Dermagraft™
debridement, irrigation , PRIMARY dressing Dermagraft™ and Adaptic®, SECONDARY dressing gauze and tape
|
Device: SECONDARY dressing gauze and tape
SECONDARY dressing gauze and tape
Procedure: debridement, irrigation
debridement, irrigation
Device: Dermagraft™
Dermagraft™ per company protocol
|
|
Experimental: Oasis™
debridement, irrigation , PRIMARY dressing Oasis™ and Adaptic®, SECONDARY dressing gauze and tape
|
Device: SECONDARY dressing gauze and tape
SECONDARY dressing gauze and tape
Procedure: debridement, irrigation
debridement, irrigation
Device: Oasis™
Oasis™ per company protocol
|
Eligibility| Ages Eligible for Study: | 18 Years to 85 Years |
| Genders Eligible for Study: | Both |
| Accepts Healthy Volunteers: | No |
Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
(answering NO will exclude patient):
- An Institutional Review Board (IRB) Informed Consent Form is signed and dated prior to any study-related activities?
- The area of the study ulcer after debridement is between 1cm2 and 25cm2 at Week 0 / Visit # 3?
- Is the subject between 18 and 85 years of age?
- Subject's highest Ankle Brachial Pressure Index (ABPI) / Ankle Arm Index (AAI) is greater than or equal to 0.80 and lower than 1.4? (the highest ABPI/AAI value from three measurements within last 6 months shall apply)
- Does the patient have one or more diabetic ulcers on the target foot with only one ulcer selected as the study (target) ulcer? The target ulcer must be at least 4 cm from a non-target ulcer and in the Investigator's opinion, be unlikely to coalesce with another ulcer within 12 weeks of randomization.
- Subject's study ulcer is full thickness and does not extend to bone, muscle, or tendon?
- Subject's study ulcer has been present at least 4 weeks prior to the initial screening (visit #1) or 6 weeks at randomization (visit #3)?
- Subject has been diagnosed with type 1 or type 2 diabetes and hgbA1c is less than 10%?
- Study ulcer has no clinical feature of infection? (2 signs of inflammation and elevated bacterial load of the wound)
- For female subjects of childbearing age potential, does the subject have a negative pregnancy test and is not lactating for the duration of the study?
- Subject understands the requirements of this study and is willing to comply with all the study requirements?
Exclusion Criteria:
answering YES will exclude patient):
- Is the subject diagnosed with cancer and is undergoing treatment with immunosuppressive or chemotherapeutic agents, radiotherapy or systemic corticosteroids less than 30 days before enrollment?
- Is the patient diagnosed with HIV/AIDS?
- Is the patient diagnosed with any bleeding disorders?
- Is the patient diagnosed with any connective tissue diseases?
- For female subjects, is the subject pregnant or lactating?
- Does the patient have a history of elicit drug use within one year of enrollment?
- In the past year, did you experience episodes of drinking more than 5 alcoholic beverages in less than two hours and/or did drinking alcohol become a problem in your interpersonal relationships, work, driving and/or your behavior in general?
- Does the patient have any active infected wounds or osteomyelitis (confirmed by bone biopsy, MRI or bone scan)?
- If patient had Doppler exam within the last 365 days, did it demonstrate reflux greater than 0.5 seconds?
- Is the subject diagnosed with active Charcot as described by Sander's classification system?
- Does the patient manifest signs of poor nutritional status and/or albumin level < 2.9?
- Did the patient use Dermagraft™ and/or Oasis™ in the last 60 days?
- Is the study ulcer size less than 1.0 cm2 or greater than 25 cm2?
- Does the patient have any porcine allergy or cow product allergy?
- Does the subject's recent (last 30 days) chemistry tests serum creatinine, 2 times above the upper limit of normal and/or LFT's 3 times above the upper limit of normal?
- Between week -2/visit 1 and week 0/visit 3 (randomization) did the study ulcer decrease in size by more than 40%, or increase in size by more than 50%?
Contacts and Locations
Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01450943
Locations
| United States, California | |
| VA Mather, CA | Recruiting |
| Mather, California, United States, 95655 | |
| Contact: Lam Nguyen 916-734-6556 lam.nguyen@ucdmc.ucdavis.edu | |
| Contact: Hadar Lev-Tov lhadar1@gmail.com | |
| Principal Investigator: Rivkah R Isseroff, MD | |
Sponsors and Collaborators
VA Northern California Health Care System
More Information
No publications provided by VA Northern California Health Care System
Additional publications automatically indexed to this study by ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier (NCT Number):
| Responsible Party: | Rivkah Isseroff, Chief, Dermatology Service Department of Veterans Affairs, Mather CA, VA Northern California Health Care System |
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT01450943 History of Changes |
| Other Study ID Numbers: | 11-04-00618 |
| Study First Received: | October 7, 2011 |
| Last Updated: | October 12, 2011 |
| Health Authority: | United States: Federal Government |
Keywords provided by VA Northern California Health Care System:
|
Diabetic Foot Ulcer Chronic wounds Chronic ulcers |
Oasis Dermagraft Adaptic |
Additional relevant MeSH terms:
|
Ulcer Foot Ulcer Diabetic Foot Pathologic Processes Foot Diseases Skin Diseases Leg Ulcer Skin Ulcer |
Diabetic Angiopathies Vascular Diseases Cardiovascular Diseases Diabetes Complications Diabetes Mellitus Endocrine System Diseases Diabetic Neuropathies |
ClinicalTrials.gov processed this record on May 16, 2013