The Impact of Real-time Feedback on Physical Activity Patterns in Flemish Employees
- Full Text View
- Tabular View
- Study Results
- Disclaimer
- How to Read a Study Record
Purpose
The aim of the study is to assess an increase of daily physical activity from electronic self-monitoring, to compare these values to the 10.000 step program, and to compare with real-time feedback with and without guidance from a Personal Coach.
| Condition | Intervention |
|---|---|
|
Sedentary Lifestyle |
Device: SenseWear display Device: Pedometer Device: SenseWear Armband Behavioral: Personal Coaching |
| Study Type: | Interventional |
| Study Design: | Allocation: Randomized Endpoint Classification: Efficacy Study Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment Masking: Open Label Primary Purpose: Supportive Care |
| Official Title: | The Impact of Real-time Feedback on Physical Activity Patterns in Flemish Employees: an Intervention Study |
- Physical Activity Level [ Time Frame: One year ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]To account for differences in body size and composition, the 24-hour energy requirement (kcal/day) is expressed as a multiple of the basal metabolic rate per 24 hours by using the PAL value (PAL = total energy expenditure/basal metabolic rate). A desirable PAL includes the regular practice of physical activity at work or in spare time with an intensity and duration that will reduce the risk of becoming overweight and developing a variety of non-communicable chronic diseases usually associated as co-morbidities with obesity. This corresponds to PAL values of 1.75 and higher.
- Daily Energy Expenditure in Physical Activity [ Time Frame: One year ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]Minutes of physical activity. Activities can be classified as moderate-intensity, vigorous-intensity or very vigorous-intensity activities based upon the amount of energy used by the body while doing the activity.
- Percent of Participants Losing Fat Percentage [ Time Frame: One Year ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]The amount of body fat is measured by bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA).
- Stages of Motivational Readiness for Physical Activity [ Time Frame: One Year ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]According to The Stages of Motivational Readiness for Change Model (SOC), individuals move through a series of stages as they adopt and maintain a new habit(Prochaska & DiClemente, 1983). Specifically, the stages include Precontemplation, Contemplation, Preparation, Action, and Maintenance.The relevant variables were assessed in a self-administered questionnaire.
- Step Count [ Time Frame: One Year ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]Daily number of steps
| Enrollment: | 227 |
| Study Start Date: | August 2010 |
| Estimated Study Completion Date: | December 2012 |
| Estimated Primary Completion Date: | August 2012 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure) |
| Arms | Assigned Interventions |
|---|---|
|
Placebo Comparator: Control group
This group receives no kind of feedback during the intervention period. The participants wear the SenseWear Armband for 4 weeks and results of the intervention are discussed after the 4 week intervention period.
|
Device: SenseWear Armband
Participants wear the SenseWear Armband for 4 weeks
Other Names:
|
|
Experimental: Step Group
This group receives feedback about the daily amount of steps by means of a pedometer.
|
Device: Pedometer
Participants receive a pedometer to determine their daily amount of steps. Every day they write down their amount of steps in a step diary.
Other Name: Yamax Digi-Walker SW-200
|
|
Experimental: Display Group
Participants receive real time feedback on their energy expenditure, minutes of physical activity and step count by means of the SenseWear Display
|
Device: SenseWear display
Participants use the self-monitoring device (display) to aid behavior change via real-time lifestyle feedback targeting physical activity. The display has a versatile design that allows it to be clipped to a shirt, bag or belt loop. The Display can help participants stay in sync with their daily goals. Other Name: BodyMedia® Display (Model DD100)
|
|
Experimental: Coaching Group
Participants receive real-time feedback on their energy expenditure, step count and minutes of physical activity by means of the SenseWear Display and weekly meet with a Personal Coach to discuss their progress
|
Behavioral: Personal Coaching
A weekly meeting with a Personal Coach to evaluate the physical activity patterns in daily life
|
Detailed Description:
The purpose of this intervention study is to determine the effectiveness of continuous self-monitoring and real-time feedback from the SenseWear Armband (BodyMedia) alone and in combination with Personal Coaching to enhance physical activity and influence consciousness about its own physical activity patterns over a 12-month period in sedentary Flemish employees. The investigators hypothesize that the use of the feedback will increase awareness and subsequent physical activity levels of inactive office workers. Another hypothesizes is that the weekly meeting with a Personal Coach will add a controlling element and therefore employees of the 'coaching group' will have a higher physical activity level at the end of the intervention period compared to the other groups.
Eligibility| Ages Eligible for Study: | 18 Years to 68 Years |
| Genders Eligible for Study: | Both |
| Accepts Healthy Volunteers: | Yes |
Inclusion Criteria:
- Employee
- Physical Activity Level < 1.71 MET
- Willing to wear the SenseWear Armband for 5-6 weeks
Exclusion Criteria:
- Student
- Senior
Contacts and Locations| Belgium | |
| Katholieke Universiteit Leuven - Tervuursevest 101 | |
| Leuven, Belgium, 3000 | |
| Study Director: | Johan Lefevre, Prof Dr. | Katholieke Universiteit Leuven |
More Information
No publications provided
| Responsible Party: | Karen Van Hoye, Phd Student, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven |
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT01432327 History of Changes |
| Other Study ID Numbers: | KULEUVEN_RTFDB |
| Study First Received: | September 9, 2011 |
| Results First Received: | February 15, 2012 |
| Last Updated: | April 18, 2012 |
| Health Authority: | Belgium: Ethics Committee |
Keywords provided by Katholieke Universiteit Leuven:
|
motor activity randomized controlled trial feedback |
ClinicalTrials.gov processed this record on May 19, 2013