Biological Image Guided Antalgic Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy of Bone Metastases
- Full Text View
- Tabular View
- No Study Results Posted
- Disclaimer
- How to Read a Study Record
Purpose
In various common cancers, the skeleton is a preferred site of metastasis. These bone metastases are the most common cause of cancer-related pain, which significantly impair quality of life. It is postulated that the clinical target volume (CTV) of painful bone metastases consists of cancer cells and tumor-associated host cells: the tumor-host ecosystem. Advances in biological imaging (positron emitting tomography PET) might allow us to selectively identify the tumor-host ecosystem within the anatomical boundaries of a bone metastasis. These findings suggest the potential of intentionally non-homogenous dose escalation (dose painting by numbers) to improve pain control. The hypothesis is that fluorodeoxyglucose positron emitting tomography (FDG-PET) can detect the intra-bone metastasis regions confined with tumor-associated host-cell compartments responsible for metastasis-related pain. The primary objective is to improve pain control with biological image-guided stereotactic body radiotherapy compared to conventional radiotherapy.
| Condition | Intervention | Phase |
|---|---|---|
|
Bone Metastases |
Radiation: Conventional Radiotherapy Radiation: Biological image-guided radiotherapy with conventional dose. Radiation: Biological image-guided SBRT with dose-escalation. |
Phase 2 Phase 3 |
| Study Type: | Interventional |
| Study Design: | Allocation: Randomized Endpoint Classification: Efficacy Study Intervention Model: Single Group Assignment Masking: Single Blind (Subject) Primary Purpose: Treatment |
| Official Title: | Biological Image Guided Antalgic Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy of Bone Metastases: a Randomized Phase II/III Trial |
- Level of pain response 1 month after radiotherapy [ Time Frame: 1 month after radiotherapy ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]Pain is measured with the visual analogue scale. Response is scored in accordance to the guidelines of the international consensus on palliative radiotherapy.
- Quality of life 1 month after radiotherapy. [ Time Frame: 1 Month after radiotherapy ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]Quality of life 1 month after radiotherapy measured with the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Bone Metastases Module (QLQ-BM22).
| Estimated Enrollment: | 120 |
| Study Start Date: | February 2013 |
| Estimated Study Completion Date: | January 2014 |
| Estimated Primary Completion Date: | January 2014 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure) |
| Arms | Assigned Interventions |
|---|---|
| Active Comparator: Conventional radiotherapy |
Radiation: Conventional Radiotherapy
Conventional radiotherapy will be used (8 Gy/ 1 fraction).
|
| Experimental: Biological image-guided radiotherapy with conventional dose. |
Radiation: Biological image-guided radiotherapy with conventional dose.
Biological image-guided radiotherapy on the positron emitting tomography (PET) positive lesion with conventional dose (8Gy/ 1 fraction) will be used.
|
| Experimental: Biological image-guided SBRT with dose-escalation. |
Radiation: Biological image-guided SBRT with dose-escalation.
Biological image-guided stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) with dose-escalation on the PET positive lesion will be used.
|
Eligibility| Ages Eligible for Study: | 18 Years and older |
| Genders Eligible for Study: | Both |
| Accepts Healthy Volunteers: | No |
Inclusion Criteria:
- Painful bone metastasis of solid tumors
- Pain score minimum of 2 on a scale of 10
- A maximum number of painful bone metastases: 3 or more
- Life expectancy > 3 months
- Age minimum 18 years old
- Signed informed consent
Exclusion Criteria:
- Tumor histology (renal cell and melanoma vs. other solid tumors)
- VAS pain score (<5 vs. 6-10).
- Bisphosphonate use (yes vs. no)
- Opioid analgesics (yes vs. no)
- Corticosteroid use (yes vs. no)
- Spine vs non-spine localisation
Contacts and Locations| Contact: Piet Ost, MD | 09/3323074 | piet.ost@ugent.be |
| Belgium | |
| University Hospital Antwerp | Not yet recruiting |
| Antwerp, Belgium | |
| Contact: Dirk Van Gestel, M.D. | |
| Principal Investigator: Dirk Van Gestel, M.D. | |
| Ghent University Hospital | Not yet recruiting |
| Ghent, Belgium, 9000 | |
| Contact: Wilfried De Neve, MD, PhD +32(0)93323074 ext +32 wilfried.deneve@uzgent.be | |
| Principal Investigator: Wilfried De Neve, MD, PhD | |
| Sub-Investigator: Christophe Vandewiele, MD, PhD | |
| Sub-Investigator: Indira Madani, MD | |
| Sub-Investigator: Piet Ost, PhD, MD | |
| Sub-Investigator: Bruno De Potter, MD | |
| Principal Investigator: | Wilfried De Neve, MD, PhD | University Hospital, Ghent |
More Information
Additional Information:
No publications provided
| Responsible Party: | University Hospital, Ghent |
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT01429493 History of Changes |
| Other Study ID Numbers: | 2011/541 |
| Study First Received: | September 2, 2011 |
| Last Updated: | February 1, 2013 |
| Health Authority: | Belgium: Ethics Committee |
Additional relevant MeSH terms:
|
Neoplasm Metastasis Neoplasms, Second Primary Bone Neoplasms Bone Marrow Diseases Neoplastic Processes Neoplasms |
Pathologic Processes Neoplasms by Site Bone Diseases Musculoskeletal Diseases Hematologic Diseases |
ClinicalTrials.gov processed this record on May 19, 2013