Pressure-wire Guided PTCA: Drug Eluting Stent Versus Drug Eluting Balloon (WinDEB Study)
- Full Text View
- Tabular View
- No Study Results Posted
- Disclaimer
- How to Read a Study Record
Purpose
The aim of the study is to show the safety and efficacy of the SeQuent® Please (Drug Eluting Balloon or DEB) vs. commonly used Drug Eluting Stents in the treatment of small vessel disease and side branches by pressure wire guided percutaneous coronary intervention.
| Condition | Intervention |
|---|---|
|
Coronary Artery Disease |
Device: Angioplasty performed via Paclitaxel Eluting Balloon catheter Device: Angioplasty via DES |
| Study Type: | Interventional |
| Study Design: | Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment Masking: Single Blind |
| Official Title: | Pressure Wire-guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention of Small Vessels or Side Branches: Functional Outcome of Drug-Eluting Stent (DES) Versus Drug-Eluting Balloon (DEB) With Provisional Bare Metal Stent Implantation |
- Loss in fractional flow reserve (FFR) at 6 months for both treatment groups [ Time Frame: 6 month ]
- Occurrence of acute (up to 48 hours), subacute (up to 30 days) and late stent thrombosis [ Time Frame: acute: <48h; subacute: < 30days ]
- NACCE rate at 30 days, 6 and 12 months [ Time Frame: 30days, 6 and 12 month ]
- Procedural success
- Percent in-stent stenosis, in-segment stenosis, in-stent late lumen loss and in-segment late lumen loss at 6 months follow-up [ Time Frame: 6 month ]Percent in-stent stenosis, in-segment stenosis, in-stent late lumen loss and in-segment late lumen loss at 6 months follow-up
- Angiographic in-stent restenosis rate of the target lesion (≥ 50 % stenosis) at 6 months from the procedure [ Time Frame: 6 month ]
- Angiographic in-segment stenosis rate of the target lesion (≥ 50 % stenosis) at 6 months from the procedure [ Time Frame: 6 month ]
- Indication for premature follow-up
- Target vessel failure
| Study Start Date: | August 2011 |
| Arms | Assigned Interventions |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: DEB + BMS
Paclitaxel drug-eluting balloon (DEB) dilatation and bare metal stenting
|
Device: Angioplasty performed via Paclitaxel Eluting Balloon catheter |
| Active Comparator: Stenting with commonly used Drug Eluting Stents (DES) |
Device: Angioplasty via DES
Angioplasty performed via commonly used Drug Eluting Stents
|
Detailed Description:
This study is a randomized, prospective, multi-center, efficacy study with a DES control group assessing the 6-month loss in FFR in patients treated with the "matrix coated paclitaxel-eluting PTCA-balloon catheter" SeQuent® Please and commonly used DES for small vessel de novo and side branch lesions. 100 patients will be studied in total with two equivalent treatment groups DEB & DES of 50 patients each.
Eligibility| Ages Eligible for Study: | 18 Years and older |
| Genders Eligible for Study: | Both |
| Accepts Healthy Volunteers: | No |
Inclusion Criteria:
- Patients of at least 18 years of age.
- Patients with stable angina pectoris (CCS class 1-3) or with unstable angina pectoris (Braunwald class 1-2, A-C) or documented ischemia or with documented silent ischemia
- Patients must agree to undergo the angiographic 6-month and clinical follow-ups at 12 and 36 months.
- De novo coronary lesions including side branches in native coronary arteries (reference vessel between ≥ 2.0 and ≤ 3.0 mm, lesion length ≤ 25 mm as angiographically documented)
- Diameter stenosis pre procedure must be either ≥ 70 % or ≥ 50 % if ischemia corresponding to the target lesion is documented either by exercise stress ECG, stress echocardiography, scintigraphy, MRT, or suspected based on angina pectoris.
- Fractional Flow Reserve (FFR) must be less or equal to 0.75.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Patients with a life expectancy of less than 12 months
- Patients that were treated with one or more DES during the last 12 months which would not allow 3-month dual antiplatelet therapy if the patient were randomized in the DEB treatment group.
- Patients who are obliged to be on dual antiplatelet aggregation therapy for more than 3 months following study inclusion
- Patients with acute (< 24 h) or recent (48 hours) myocardial infarction
- Patients with severe congestive heart failure or with severe heart failure NYHA IV or with severe valvular heart disease
- Patients demonstrating clinical signs of cardiogenic shock at the time of the procedure (systolic blood pressure of less than 80 mmHg requiring inotropic support, IABP and/or fluid challenge)
- DES treated lesion(s) during the last 12 months.
- Thrombus burden (STEMI, NSTEMI) and/or total occlusion in the culprit segment
- In-segment stenosis of the native vessel within the 5 mm adjacent to the stent
Contacts and Locations
More Information
No publications provided
| Responsible Party: | Thomas Neunteufl, MD, Univ. Klinik für Innere Medizin II; Department of Cardiology |
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT01399463 History of Changes |
| Other Study ID Numbers: | MUWCard18022011 |
| Study First Received: | July 20, 2011 |
| Last Updated: | July 20, 2011 |
| Health Authority: | Austria: Federal Ministry of Health |
Keywords provided by Medical University of Vienna:
|
Drug Eluting Stent, Drug Eluting Balloon, Fractional Flow Reserve, DES, DEB, FFR |
Additional relevant MeSH terms:
|
Coronary Artery Disease Myocardial Ischemia Coronary Disease Heart Diseases Cardiovascular Diseases Arteriosclerosis Arterial Occlusive Diseases Vascular Diseases Paclitaxel |
Tubulin Modulators Antimitotic Agents Mitosis Modulators Molecular Mechanisms of Pharmacological Action Pharmacologic Actions Antineoplastic Agents, Phytogenic Antineoplastic Agents Therapeutic Uses |
ClinicalTrials.gov processed this record on June 18, 2013