Risk-stratified Osteoporosis Strategy Evaluation Study (ROSE)
- Full Text View
- Tabular View
- No Study Results Posted
- Disclaimer
- How to Read a Study Record
Purpose
The Risk-stratified Osteoporosis Strategy Evaluation Study is a prospective, randomized, population-based study designed to test whether risk-stratified screening for osteoporosis in women aged 65-80 years is effective in preventing fractures.
| Condition | Intervention |
|---|---|
|
Osteoporosis |
Other: Screening Other: Observation |
| Study Type: | Interventional |
| Study Design: | Allocation: Randomized Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment Masking: Single Blind (Subject) Primary Purpose: Screening |
| Official Title: | Risk-stratified Osteoporosis Strategy Evaluation Study (ROSE) |
- The effect of screening for osteoporosis with a two-step programme involving FRAX risk score followed by DXA for the prevention of hip fracture and other osteoporosis-related fracture events [ Time Frame: Three years follow-up on average ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]Comparison of register data concerning hospitalizations for primarily hip fracture between the intervention and control group as a whole. Power calculations suggest three years of followup on average, but this time frame could be increased if participation falls short.
- Cost-effectiveness / cost-utility of a two-step screening programme. [ Time Frame: Three years follow-up on average ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]Comparison of register-based health related costs due to antiosteoporotic medications combined with generated costs due to hospitalizations for osteoporosis-related fractures. Follow-up time is defined by the primary outcome measure
| Estimated Enrollment: | 30000 |
| Study Start Date: | January 2010 |
| Estimated Study Completion Date: | January 2020 |
| Estimated Primary Completion Date: | January 2017 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure) |
| Arms | Assigned Interventions |
|---|---|
|
Screening
Two-step screening process using FRAX risk score assessment followed by DXA scanning for high risk participants.
|
Other: Screening
Screening by risk factor assessment followed by DXA
|
|
Control
Control arm - Fracture risk assessment by FRAX without any intervention
|
Other: Observation
Observation by use of register data
|
Detailed Description:
Osteoporosis is highly prevalent especially in postmenopausal women. Approximately 46 % of all women will suffer at least one osteoporotic fracture after the age of 50. The US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) and National Osteoporosis Foundation (NOF) recommend screening with dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) in all women aged 65 years and above regardless of risk factors. Nevertheless, the use of clinical risk factors has been shown to enhance the risk-gradient and accuracy of fracture risk prediction. The FRAX risk assessment score was derived from large population-based cohorts and validated in separate validation cohorts. Its use as a risk assessment tool is endorsed by WHO, but no prospective studies examining the effect of a screening programme using a combination of FRAX and DXA in a two-step manner have been performed previously.
Therefore, 50.000 women aged 65-80 years are randomized in a 1:1 fashion to a screening arm and a control arm. Participants receive a letter of invitation together with a questionnaire based survey with 25 questions including FRAX risk score elements. In the screening arm, all participants with a calculated 10-year risk of major osteoporotic fracture above 15 percent are invited to a DXA examination. The primary physicians of scanned participants receive information about scanning results, and medical secondary prevention is recommended for participants diagnosed with osteoporosis (T-score < -2,5, WHO definition) and initiated by the primary physician.
The aim of the study is to investigate the effect of a risk-stratified screening programme in preventing fractures in the general population of women aged 65-80. Secondary end points examine the acceptance, cost-effectiveness and cost-utility as well as assessment of participants' attitudes towards and experience with the described two-step screening programme. The study is endpoint driven; participants are included in a 1:1 manner until 1200-1500 participants are treated for osteoporosis.
Eligibility| Ages Eligible for Study: | 65 Years to 80 Years |
| Genders Eligible for Study: | Female |
| Accepts Healthy Volunteers: | Yes |
Inclusion Criteria:
- Women
- Age 65-80 years
- Inhabitants of the Region of Southern Denmark
Exclusion Criteria:
- Current antiosteoporotic treatment
- Unability to give informed consent
Contacts and Locations
More Information
No publications provided
| Responsible Party: | Professor Kim Brixen, Institute of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark |
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT01388244 History of Changes |
| Other Study ID Numbers: | ROSE, S-20090127 |
| Study First Received: | June 29, 2011 |
| Last Updated: | April 23, 2013 |
| Health Authority: | Denmark: The Regional Committee on Biomedical Research Ethics |
Keywords provided by Odense University Hospital:
|
Mass Screening Risk Assessment Femoral Fractures Absorptiometry, Photon |
Additional relevant MeSH terms:
|
Osteoporosis Bone Diseases, Metabolic Bone Diseases Musculoskeletal Diseases |
ClinicalTrials.gov processed this record on May 23, 2013