Ultrasound-Guided Needle Biopsy in the Diagnosis of Malignant Cervical Lymphadenopathies
- Full Text View
- Tabular View
- No Study Results Posted
- Disclaimer
- How to Read a Study Record
Purpose
The objective of the present study was to compare ultrasound (US) characteristics and ultrasound-guided core-needle biopsy (US-CNB) with US-guided fine-needle aspiration (US-FNA) in the assessment of different malignant cervical lymphadenopathies. Patients with malignant cervical lymphadenopathie with either US-FNA or US-CNB over a 3-year period from 2007 July to 2010 Dec were retrospectively reviewed. There are two major study groups according to the treatment status of the patient's population, including patients who had pathology proofed previous cancer and with clinically cervical lymphadenopathies after treatment. The second group included patients with cervical lymphaenopathies but without previous diagnosis of malignancy and treatment. The results of cytology, or pathology and time of needle biopsy to final diagnosis were traced and recorded. Morphologic US parameters and vascular features were thoroughly evaluated and compared in different disease.
| Condition |
|---|
|
Lymphadenopathy Malignancy |
| Study Type: | Observational |
| Study Design: | Time Perspective: Retrospective |
| Official Title: | Real-time Ultrasound-Guided Needle Biopsy in the Diagnosis of Malignant Cervical Lymphadenopathies |
- time of needle biopsy to final diagnosis [ Time Frame: days from needle biopsy to final diagnosis ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
| Enrollment: | 116 |
| Study Start Date: | July 2007 |
| Study Completion Date: | December 2010 |
| Primary Completion Date: | December 2010 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure) |
| Groups/Cohorts |
|---|
| ultrasound,lymphadenopathy |
Show Detailed Description
Eligibility| Ages Eligible for Study: | 20 Years to 85 Years |
| Genders Eligible for Study: | Both |
| Accepts Healthy Volunteers: | No |
| Sampling Method: | Non-Probability Sample |
Patients with malignant cervical lymphadenopathie with either US-FNA or US-CNB over a 3-year period from 2007 July to 2010 Dec were retrospectively reviewed. There are two major study groups according to the treatment status of the patient's population, including patients who had pathology proofed previous cancer and with clinically cervical lymphadenopathies after treatment. The second group included patients with cervical lymphaenopathies but without previous diagnosis of malignancy and treatment.
Inclusion Criteria:
Patients with malignant cervical lymphadenopathie With US-FNA or US-CNB evaluation before
Exclusion Criteria:
No ultrasound exam
Contacts and Locations| Taiwan | |
| Department of Otolaryngology, Far Eastern Memorial Hospital | |
| Taipei, Taiwan | |
| Principal Investigator: | Li-Jen Liao, M.D. | Department of Otolaryngology, Far Eastern Memorial Hospital, New Taipei City, Taiwan |
More Information
No publications provided
| Responsible Party: | Liao Li-Jen, Department of Otolaryngology, Far Eastern Memorial Hospital |
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT01384357 History of Changes |
| Other Study ID Numbers: | 100026-E |
| Study First Received: | June 27, 2011 |
| Last Updated: | June 27, 2011 |
| Health Authority: | Taiwan: Department of Health |
Keywords provided by Far Eastern Memorial Hospital:
|
lymphadenopathy needle biopsy sonography |
Additional relevant MeSH terms:
|
Neoplasms Lymphatic Diseases |
ClinicalTrials.gov processed this record on June 17, 2013