The Effect of Different I:E Ratio on Gas Exchange of Patients Undergoing Gynecologic Laparoscopic Surgery With Trendelenburg Position
- Full Text View
- Tabular View
- No Study Results Posted
- Disclaimer
- How to Read a Study Record
Purpose
In patients undergoing gynecologic laparoscopic surgery with trendelenburg position, the disturbance of pulmonary gas exchange frequently occurs due to high intra-abdominal pressure. The investigators tried to evaluate the effect of various inspiratory to expiratory ratio on pulmonary gas exchange by randomized controlled trial.
| Condition | Intervention |
|---|---|
|
Uterine Myoma Ovarian Cyst Laparoscopic Gynecologic Surgery |
Procedure: conventional I:E ratio Procedure: 1:1 ratio Procedure: 2:1 group Procedure: external PEEP |
| Study Type: | Interventional |
| Study Design: | Allocation: Randomized Endpoint Classification: Safety/Efficacy Study Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment Masking: Single Blind (Subject) |
| Official Title: | The Effect of Different I:E Ratio on Gas Exchange of Patients Undergoing Gynecologic Laparoscopic Surgery With Trendelenburg Position |
- arterial CO2 partial pressure [ Time Frame: 10 minutes after induction of general anesthesia ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]arteial CO2 partial pressure
- arterial CO2 partial pressure [ Time Frame: 30 minutes after start of pneumoperitoneum ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]arteial CO2 partial pressure
- arterial CO2 partial pressure [ Time Frame: 60 minutes after start of pneumoperitoneum ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]arteial CO2 partial pressure
- arterial O2 partial pressure [ Time Frame: 10 min after induction, 30 and 60 min after start of pneumoperitoneum ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]arterial O2 partial pressure
- Mean airway pressure [ Time Frame: 10 min after induction, 30 and 60 min after start of pneumoperitoneum ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]Mean airway pressure
- tidal volume (setting) [ Time Frame: 10 min after induction, 30 and 60 min after start of pneumoperitoneum ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]tidal volume (setting)
- hemodynamic parameters [ Time Frame: 10 min after induction, 30 and 60 min after start of pneumoperitoneum ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]systolic/ diastolic blood pressure, heart rate, mean blood pressure
- end-tidal CO2 partial pressure [ Time Frame: 10 min after induction, 30 and 60 min after start of pneumoperitoneum ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]end-tidal CO2 partial pressure
- respiratory compliance [ Time Frame: 10 min after induction, 30 and 60 min after start of pneumoperitoneum ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]Dynamic compliance, Static compliance
- Dead space [ Time Frame: 10 min after induction, 30 and 60 min after start of pneumoperitoneum ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]physiologic dead space / tidal volume (VD/VT)
- work of breathing [ Time Frame: 10 min after induction, 30 and 60 min after start of pneumoperitoneum ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]work of breathing
- peak inspiratory pressure [ Time Frame: 10 min after induction, 30 and 60 min after start of pneumoperitoneum ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]peak inspiratory pressure
- plateau pressure [ Time Frame: 10 min after induction, 30 and 60 min after start of pneumoperitoneum ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]plateau pressure
- positive end-expiratory pressure [ Time Frame: 10 min after induction, 30 and 60 min after start of pneumoperitoneum ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]positive end-expiratory pressure
- tidal volume (exhaled) [ Time Frame: 10 min after induction, 30 and 60 min after start of pneumoperitoneum ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]tidal volume (exhaled)
- minute ventilation [ Time Frame: 10 min after induction, 30 and 60 min after start of pneumoperitoneum ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]minute ventilation
| Enrollment: | 100 |
| Study Start Date: | June 2011 |
| Study Completion Date: | March 2012 |
| Primary Completion Date: | March 2012 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure) |
| Arms | Assigned Interventions |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: 1:2 group
conventional I:E ratio group, inspiratory time : expiratory time = 1:1
|
Procedure: conventional I:E ratio
conventional I:E ratio of 1:2 is applied.
|
|
Experimental: 1:1 group
1:1 I:E ratio group, inspiratory time : expiratory time = 1:1
|
Procedure: 1:1 ratio
I:E ratio of 1:1 is applied.
|
|
Experimental: 2:1 group
inverse ratio group, inspiratory time : expiratory time = 2:1
|
Procedure: 2:1 group
Inverse I:E ratio of 2:1 is applied.
|
|
Active Comparator: 1:2 PEEP group
I:E ratio of 1:2 with external PEEP of 5 cm H2O
|
Procedure: conventional I:E ratio
conventional I:E ratio of 1:2 is applied.
Procedure: external PEEP
external positive end-expiratory pressure of 5 cmH2O is applied.
|
Detailed Description:
In patients undergoing gynecologic laparoscopic surgery with trendelenburg position, the disturbance of pulmonary gas exchange frequently occurs due to high intra-abdominal pressure. During the laparoscopic surgery with abdominal gas insufflation, gas exchange disturbance such as CO2 retention, hypoxemia occurs in addition to high plateau airway pressure. The usual strategy against these kinds of problem is pressure-controlled ventilation. However, the gas exchange problem especially CO2 retention can not be solved in some cases. The inverse-ratio ventilation (IRV), which prolongs the inspiratory time greater than expiratory time, can be applied for adult respiratory distress syndrome. The efficacy of IRV is to improve gas-exchange status by increasing mean airway pressure and alveolar recruitment. There have been several clinical investigations which applied IRV during general anesthesia. However, there have been debates about the effect of IRV during general anesthesia. Therefore, we tried to apply the IRV for subjects undergoing laparoscopic surgery, and evaluate the effect of different I:E ratio on the pulmonary gas exchange and respiratory mechanics.
Eligibility| Ages Eligible for Study: | 20 Years to 65 Years |
| Genders Eligible for Study: | Both |
| Accepts Healthy Volunteers: | No |
Inclusion Criteria:
- patients undergoing elective gynecologic laparoscopic surgery
- the duration of pneumoperitoneum during laparoscopic surgery is more than 40 minutes
Exclusion Criteria:
- ASA (American society of anesthesiologists) classification of the subjects more than III.
- Age under 20, or more than 65 years.
- Past history of pneumothorax, COPD, asthma.
- Patients with ischemic heart disease, valvular heart disease.
Contacts and Locations| Korea, Republic of | |
| Samsung Seoul Hospital, Samsung Medical Center | |
| Seoul, Korea, Republic of, 135-710 | |
| Study Director: | Tae Soo Hahm, M.D.,Ph.D. | Samsung Medical Center |
| Principal Investigator: | Won Ho Kim, M.D. | Samsung Medical Center |
More Information
No publications provided
| Responsible Party: | Tae Soo Hahm, Professor, Samsung Medical Center |
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT01379313 History of Changes |
| Other Study ID Numbers: | 2011-04-007 |
| Study First Received: | June 21, 2011 |
| Last Updated: | September 27, 2012 |
| Health Authority: | South Korea: Institutional Review Board |
Keywords provided by Samsung Medical Center:
|
laparoscopic gynecologic surgery gas exchange inspiratory time expiratory time I:E ratio |
Additional relevant MeSH terms:
|
Ovarian Cysts Cysts Ovarian Diseases Myoma Leiomyoma Myofibroma Neoplasms, Muscle Tissue Neoplasms, Connective and Soft Tissue |
Neoplasms by Histologic Type Neoplasms Adnexal Diseases Genital Diseases, Female Gonadal Disorders Endocrine System Diseases Neoplasms, Connective Tissue Connective Tissue Diseases |
ClinicalTrials.gov processed this record on May 23, 2013