Effects of Different Types of Exercise Interventions in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes
Recruitment status was Active, not recruiting
- Full Text View
- Tabular View
- No Study Results Posted
- Disclaimer
- How to Read a Study Record
Purpose
The purposes of the study are
- to determine which kind of supervised exercise intervention (aerobic endurance training versus strength endurance training versus combined aerobic endurance and strength endurance training) is more effective in improving the metabolic parameters in typ 2 diabetes patients
- to investigate what kind of intervention is more successful in reduction of concomitant diseases and improving quality of life
- to assess what kind of intervention induces highest effects in long term persistence of these positive changes
| Condition | Intervention |
|---|---|
|
Type 2 Diabetes |
Other: Aerobic endurance training intervention Other: Strength endurance training intervention Other: Combined aerobic endurance and strength endurance training |
| Study Type: | Interventional |
| Study Design: | Allocation: Randomized Endpoint Classification: Efficacy Study Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment Masking: Single Blind (Investigator) Primary Purpose: Treatment |
| Official Title: | Effects of Different Types of Exercise Interventions in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes - Aerobic Endurance Training Versus Strength Endurance Training Versus Combined Aerobic Endurance and Strength Endurance Training - |
- Change in HbA1c-level (haemoglobin A1c) [ Time Frame: 6 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- Change in HOMA-Index [ Time Frame: 3 and 6 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- Change in beta-cell-function [ Time Frame: 3 and 6 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]Measured by OGTT (Oral Glucose Tolerance Test)
- Change in fasting plasma glucose levels [ Time Frame: 3 and 6 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- Change in total cholesterol levels [ Time Frame: 3 and 6 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- Change in HDL-cholesterol levels [ Time Frame: 3 and 6 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- Change in LDL-cholesterol levels [ Time Frame: 3 and 6 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- Change in triglyceride levels [ Time Frame: 3 and 6 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- Change in antidiabetic medications [ Time Frame: 3 and 6 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]Class and dosage of blood-glucose lowering drugs are recorded before, after 3 and 6 months
- Change in inflammation markers [ Time Frame: 3 and 6 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]CrP, blood count, interleukinstatus, cytokinstatus
- Change in body weight [ Time Frame: 3 and 6 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- Change in body composition [ Time Frame: 3 and 6 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]by Bio-impedance analysis, waist to hip ratio, range of thigh
- Change in strength [ Time Frame: 3 and 6 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]by Dr. Wolff Back Check
- Change of maximum heart rate [ Time Frame: 3 and 6 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]Measured by an incremental exercise test
- Change of peak oxygen uptake [ Time Frame: 3 and 6 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]Measured by an incremental exercise test
- Change of vAT (ventilatory anaerobic threshold) [ Time Frame: 3 and 6 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]Measured by an incremental exercise test
- Change in blood pressure [ Time Frame: 3 and 6 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- Change in renal function [ Time Frame: 3 and 6 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]Creatininlevel, Albuminlevel (urine), Telomere length
- Change in concentration [ Time Frame: 3 and 6 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]by d2-test
- Change in quality of life [ Time Frame: 3 and 6 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]by questionnaire: SF-12, EQ5
- Change of nutrition [ Time Frame: 3 and 6 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]by questionnaire: FEV, FFQ
- Change in voluntary physical activity [ Time Frame: 3 and 6 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]meassured by pedometer (one week)
- Change of cardiac output by Impedance cardiography [ Time Frame: 3 and 6 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]by Task Force Monitor
- Change of barorezeptorsensitivity [ Time Frame: 3 and 6 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]by Task Force Monitor
- Change in carotid-Intima-Media-Thickness [ Time Frame: 3 and 6 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- Change in aortic pulse-wave velocity [ Time Frame: 3 and 6 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- Change in central aortic pressure [ Time Frame: 3 and 6 month ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- Change in endothelial dysfunction [ Time Frame: 3 and 6 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- Change of parodontitis [ Time Frame: 3 and 6 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- Follow up of all parameters mentioned above [ Time Frame: after 12 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]Follow up after 12 months (6 months after completing the exercise intervention) without any supervised intervention
| Enrollment: | 100 |
| Study Start Date: | April 2011 |
| Estimated Study Completion Date: | June 2012 |
| Estimated Primary Completion Date: | November 2011 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure) |
| Arms | Assigned Interventions |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Aerobic endurance training intervention
Aerobic endurance training
|
Other: Aerobic endurance training intervention
The aerobic endurance training group will use cardiovascular training devices week 1-4: 15 minutes warm up (group) 15 minutes intervention at 80-100% vAT two times per week week 5-13: 15 minutes warm up (group) 30 minutes intervention at 95-110% vAT two times per week week 14-26: 15 minutes warm up (group) 45 minutes intervention at 95-110% vAT two times per week Other Name: aerobic endurance training
|
|
Experimental: Strength endurance training intervention
Strength endurance training
|
Other: Strength endurance training intervention
The strength endurance training intervention group will perform eight exercises on weight machines (Milon circuit training- 60 seconds activity, 30 seconds break) week 1-4: 15 minutes warm up (group) 1 session resistance training intensity 3 (Buskies) two times per week week 5-13: 15 minutes warm up (group) 2 sessions resistance training intensity 5 (Buskies) two times per week week 14-26: 15 minutes warm up (group) 3 sessions resistance training intensity 5 (Buskies) two times per week Other Name: Strength endurance training
|
|
Experimental: Combined training intervention
Combined aerobic endurance training and strength endurance training intervention
|
Other: Combined aerobic endurance and strength endurance training
week 1-4: 15 minutes warm up (group) 15 minutes intervention at 80-100% vAT once per week and 15 minutes warm up (group) 1 session resistance training intensity 3 (Buskies) once per week week 5-13: 15 minutes warm up (group) 15 minutes intervention at 95-110% vAT and 1 session resistance training intensity 5 (Buskies) two times per week week 14-26: 15 minutes warm up (group) 30 minutes intervention at 95-110% vAT and 1 session resistance training intensity 5 (Buskies) once a week and 15 minutes warm up (group) 15 minutes intervention at 95-110% vAT and 2 sessions resistance training intensity 5 (Buskies) once a week Other Name: Combined aerobic endurance and strength endurance training
|
|
No Intervention: Control group
control group
|
Detailed Description:
Meta-analyses which evaluated the effects of structured exercise programs in patients with type 2 diabetes demonstrate that regular physical activity improves glycosylated haemoglobin (König et al.: Resistance Exercise and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, Deutsche Zeitschrift für Sportmedizin Jahrgang 62, Nr. 1 (2011): 5-9). Sigal et al. proved that either aerobic or resistance training alone improved glycemic control in type 2 diabetes, but the improvements are greatest with combined aerobic and resistance training (Sigal, RJ, et al.: Effects of Aerobic Training, Resistance Training, or Both on Glycemic Control in Type 2 Diabetes, Ann Intern Med. 2007 Sep 18;147(6):357-69).
Therefore, aim of the current study is to compare the effects of aerobic endurance training or resistance endurance training or the combination of aerobic endurance training and resistance endurance training in diabetes type 2 patients without any other lifestyle or dietary interventions.
Eligibility| Ages Eligible for Study: | 18 Years and older |
| Genders Eligible for Study: | Both |
| Accepts Healthy Volunteers: | No |
Inclusion Criteria:
- diagnoses of type 2 diabetes (ADA criteria)
- admitted diabetes treatments will be diet and oral hypoglycemic agents
Exclusion Criteria:
- sports intervention >60 minutes per week
- medical conditions
- preproliferative or proliferative retinopathy
- instable coronary heart disease
- inability to perform the scheduled physical activity programs
- acute clinically significant intercurrent diseases
Contacts and Locations| Germany | |
| University of Giessen | |
| Giessen, Hessen, Germany, 35394 | |
| Sportpark Zwickau, Glauchau, Meerane | |
| Zwickau, Sachsen, Germany, 08056 | |
| Principal Investigator: | Andree Hillebrecht, Dr. med. | Justus-Liebig University Giessen |
More Information
No publications provided
| Responsible Party: | Andree Hillebrecht, Dr. med., Department of Sports Medicine Giessen |
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT01377558 History of Changes |
| Other Study ID Numbers: | Gi-03-2011 |
| Study First Received: | June 9, 2011 |
| Last Updated: | June 22, 2011 |
| Health Authority: | Germany: Ethics Commission |
Keywords provided by University of Giessen:
|
aerobic training resistance training combination of aerobic and resistance training diabetes type 2 diabetes HbA1c |
endothelial dysfunction inflammation markers Parodontitis Exercise intervention training |
Additional relevant MeSH terms:
|
Diabetes Mellitus Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 Glucose Metabolism Disorders Metabolic Diseases Endocrine System Diseases |
ClinicalTrials.gov processed this record on May 19, 2013