Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Residual Rotational Laxity for Single Versus Double Bundle Techniques (LCA IRM)
This study is currently recruiting participants.
Verified March 2013 by Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nīmes
Sponsor:
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nīmes
Information provided by (Responsible Party):
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nīmes
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT01377129
First received: June 17, 2011
Last updated: March 26, 2013
Last verified: March 2013
- Full Text View
- Tabular View
- No Study Results Posted
- Disclaimer
- How to Read a Study Record
Purpose
The main objective of this study is to compare, using MRI measures with a specialized splint, the persistent rotatory laxity after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using single bundle and double bundle surgical techniques, between the seventh and eighth months after surgery, and for different degrees of knee flexion (0 °, 20 °, 40 °, 60 °).
| Condition | Intervention |
|---|---|
|
Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury |
Procedure: Single bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction Procedure: Double bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction |
| Study Type: | Interventional |
| Study Design: | Allocation: Randomized Endpoint Classification: Efficacy Study Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment Masking: Open Label Primary Purpose: Treatment |
| Official Title: | Reconstruction of the Anterior Cruciate Ligament: a Comparative MRI Study Evaluating Residual Rotational Laxity for Single Versus Double Bundle Surgical Techniques |
Resource links provided by NLM:
Further study details as provided by Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nīmes:
Primary Outcome Measures:
- Residual rotational laxity during MRI [ Time Frame: 7-8 months post-op ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]Residual rotational laxity is defined as the difference between the operated knee and the non-operated knee for "D", where D is the distance between the posterior tibial cortex and the center of the circle which forms the lateral femoral condyle. D will be evaluated at 4 angles of flexion (0°, 20°, 40° and 60°) and evaluated as a repeated measure.
Secondary Outcome Measures:
- Lysholm score [ Time Frame: 7-8 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- Lysholm score [ Time Frame: 24 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- International Knee Documentation Committee score [ Time Frame: 7-8 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- International Knee Documentation Committee score [ Time Frame: 24 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
| Estimated Enrollment: | 54 |
| Study Start Date: | October 2011 |
| Estimated Study Completion Date: | October 2013 |
| Estimated Primary Completion Date: | October 2013 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure) |
| Arms | Assigned Interventions |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: Single Bundle
These patients are operated using a single bundle technique.
|
Procedure: Single bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction
Single bundle anterior cruciate ligamentoplasty
|
|
Experimental: Double bundle
These patients are operated using a double bundle technique.
|
Procedure: Double bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction
Double bundle anterior cruciate ligamentoplasty
|
Eligibility| Ages Eligible for Study: | 18 Years and older |
| Genders Eligible for Study: | Both |
| Accepts Healthy Volunteers: | No |
Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- The patient must have given his/her informed and signed consent
- The patient must be insured or beneficiary of a health insurance plan
- The patient is available for 24 months of follow-up
- The patient requires reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament due to rupture confirmed by MRI
Exclusion Criteria:
- The patient is in an exclusion period determined by a previous study
- The patient is under judicial protection, under tutorship or curatorship
- The patient refuses to sign the consent
- It is impossible to correctly inform the patient
- The patient is pregnant
- The patient is breastfeeding
- The patient require a single bundle, "KJ-type" surgical technique
- Contra-indication for MRI scans
Contacts and Locations
Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01377129
Contacts
| Contact: Philippe Marchand, MD | +33.(0)4.66.68.72.93 | philippe.marchand@chu-nimes.fr |
| Contact: Carey M Suehs, PhD | +33.(0)4.66.68.67.88 | carey.suehs@chu-nimes.fr |
Locations
| France | |
| Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nîmes | Recruiting |
| Nîmes Cedex 09, Gard, France, 30029 | |
| Principal Investigator: Philippe Marchand, MD | |
| Sub-Investigator: Nicolas Tardy, MD | |
| Sub-Investigator: Jean-Paul Bérégi, MD PhD | |
| Sub-Investigator: Dominique Blin, MD | |
| Sub-Investigator: Gérard Ascencio, MD PhD | |
| Sub-Investigator: Pascal Kouyoumdjian, MD | |
Sponsors and Collaborators
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nīmes
Investigators
| Principal Investigator: | Philippe Marchand, MD | Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nîmes |
More Information
No publications provided
| Responsible Party: | Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nīmes |
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT01377129 History of Changes |
| Other Study ID Numbers: | LOCAL/2011/PM-03, 2011-A00465-36 |
| Study First Received: | June 17, 2011 |
| Last Updated: | March 26, 2013 |
| Health Authority: | France: Afssaps - Agence française de sécurité sanitaire des produits de santé (Saint-Denis) France: Committee for the Protection of Personnes |
Keywords provided by Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nīmes:
|
Residual Rotational Laxity |
ClinicalTrials.gov processed this record on May 23, 2013