Proprioceptive Function, Postural Stability & Clinical Outcome After Stump Preserving Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Surgery
Recruitment status was Active, not recruiting
- Full Text View
- Tabular View
- No Study Results Posted
- Disclaimer
- How to Read a Study Record
Purpose
Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) is known to serve a number of functions in the knee joint. Besides providing mechanical stability, it also contributes to proprioceptive function. Numerous studies reported ACL is rich in mechanoreceptors contribute in proprioceptive function. ACL augmentation, or selective ACL bundle (AM, anteromedial or PL, posterolateral) reconstruction, a relatively new technique for partial torn ACL, preserves and augments the ACL remnant aiming at maintaining or facilitating proprioception, is now gaining its popularity. Preserving ACL stump is also reported to have merits in providing better mechanical protection and promoting revascularization to the newly reconstructed graft.
In local setting, stump preserving ACL surgery is the usual practice in handling partial ACL tear. With the background of the surgery's potential benefits in restoration of knee function, a single-blinded, comparative study on the difference in proprioception, postural stability and clinical outcome between stump preserving ACL surgery and reconstruction is conducted.
| Condition | Intervention |
|---|---|
|
Ruptured Anterior Cruciate Ligament Partial Tear Ligament |
Other: conventional ACL rehabilitation program |
| Study Type: | Interventional |
| Study Design: | Allocation: Non-Randomized Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment Masking: Single Blind (Subject) Primary Purpose: Health Services Research |
| Official Title: | Proprioceptive Function, Postural Stability & Clinical Outcome After Stump Preserving Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Surgery - A Comparative Study |
- Joint Position Sense 1 [ Time Frame: Joint position sense at an expected average of 4 weeks before operation ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]Using Biodex Dynamometer (Biodex Medical Systems, Shirley, NY, USA) for measurement.
- Joint Position Sense 2 [ Time Frame: Joint position sense at 1 month post-operation ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]Using Biodex Dynamometer (Biodex Medical Systems, Shirley, NY, USA) for measurement.
- Joint Position Sense 3 [ Time Frame: Joint position sense at 3 month post-operation ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]Using Biodex Dynamometer (Biodex Medical Systems, Shirley, NY, USA) for measurement.
- Joint Position Sense 4 [ Time Frame: Joint Position Sense at 6 months post-operation ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]Using Biodex Dynamometer (Biodex Medical Systems, Shirley, NY, USA) for measurement.
- Joint Position Sense 5 [ Time Frame: Joint position sense at 1 year post-operation ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]Using Biodex Dynamometer (Biodex Medical Systems, Shirley, NY, USA) for measurement.
- Postural Balance 1 [ Time Frame: Postural balance at an expected average of 4 weeks before operation ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]Using Biodex Stability System (BSS; Biodex Medical Systems, Shirley, NY, USA with software version 3.1) for measurement
- Postural Balance 2 [ Time Frame: Postural balance at 1 month post-operation ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]Using Biodex Stability System (BSS; Biodex Medical Systems, Shirley, NY, USA with software version 3.1) for measurement
- Postural Balance 3 [ Time Frame: Postural balance at 3 month post-operation ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]Using Biodex Stability System (BSS; Biodex Medical Systems, Shirley, NY, USA with software version 3.1) for measurement
- Postural Balance 4 [ Time Frame: Postural balance at 6 month post-operation ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]Using Biodex Stability System (BSS; Biodex Medical Systems, Shirley, NY, USA with software version 3.1) for measurement
- Postural Balance 5 [ Time Frame: Postural balance at 1 year post-operation ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]Using Biodex Stability System (BSS; Biodex Medical Systems, Shirley, NY, USA with software version 3.1) for measurement
- Clinical Test 1 [ Time Frame: Test at an expected average of 4 weeks before operation ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]Anterior Drawer Test, Lachman Test and Knee range of motion
- Clinical Test 2 [ Time Frame: Post-operative 3 month ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]Anterior Drawer Test, Lachman Test and Knee range of motion
- Clinical Tests 3 [ Time Frame: Post-operative 6 month ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]Anterior Drawer Test, Lachman Test and Knee range of motion
- Clinical Tests 4 [ Time Frame: Post-operative 1 year ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]Anterior Drawer Test, Lachman Test and Knee range of motion
| Estimated Enrollment: | 48 |
| Study Start Date: | May 2011 |
| Estimated Study Completion Date: | February 2012 |
| Estimated Primary Completion Date: | December 2011 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure) |
| Arms | Assigned Interventions |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Stump Preserving ACL Surgery
Patients of partial tear ACL injury fulfilling inclusion criteria received stump preserving ACL surgery, entered conventional ACL reconstruction rehabilitation program
|
Other: conventional ACL rehabilitation program
Conventional post-operative physical therapy exercises and rehabilitation, designed for ACL reconstruction for 6 months to 9 months.
|
|
Active Comparator: ACL Reconstruction
Patients with complete tear ACL injury received ACL reconstruction entered conventional ACL rehabilitation program
|
Other: conventional ACL rehabilitation program
Conventional post-operative physical therapy exercises and rehabilitation, designed for ACL reconstruction for 6 months to 9 months.
|
Show Detailed Description
Eligibility| Ages Eligible for Study: | 18 Years and older |
| Genders Eligible for Study: | Both |
| Accepts Healthy Volunteers: | No |
Inclusion Criteria:
- for stump reserving group: partial tear ACL injury with remnant of sizable, reasonable thickness and tension suitable
- for ACL reconstruction group: complete tear ACL injury
- for both groups: no complication such as wound infection after operation
- no history of medical problems, for example, heart disease
Exclusion Criteria:
- concomitant Medial Collateral Ligament (MCL), Lateral Collateral Ligament (LCL), Posterior Cruciate Ligament (PCL) injury, meniscus tear on the relevant knee
- previous or concomitant surgery on the relevant knee and other joints
- surgery or traumatic injuries to the contralateral limb
Contacts and Locations| China | |
| Physiotherapy Department, Prince of Wales Hospital, Shatin | |
| Hong Kong, China, 852 | |
| Principal Investigator: | Holly KH Leung | Physiotherapy Department, Prince of Wales Hospital, Shatin, Hong Kong |
More Information
No publications provided
| Responsible Party: | Holly Leung King Ho, Physiotherapy Department of Prince of Wales Hospital |
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT01348945 History of Changes |
| Other Study ID Numbers: | SPACL-CS |
| Study First Received: | May 4, 2011 |
| Last Updated: | May 5, 2011 |
| Health Authority: | Hong Kong: Joint CUHK-NTEC Clinical Research Ethics Committee |
Keywords provided by Chinese University of Hong Kong:
|
Partial tear ACL Stump preserved ACL surgery |
Additional relevant MeSH terms:
|
Rupture Wounds and Injuries |
ClinicalTrials.gov processed this record on May 16, 2013