PROximal Protection VErsus NON-Protection in Carotid Artery Stenting (PROVENON)
- Full Text View
- Tabular View
- No Study Results Posted
- Disclaimer
- How to Read a Study Record
Purpose
To compare the incidence of new ischemic brain injury detected with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) after carotid artery stenting in patients treated with and without proximal cerebral protection (Gore Flow Reversal System).
| Condition | Intervention | Phase |
|---|---|---|
|
Carotid Artery Stenosis |
Procedure: Carotid Artery Stenting with Proximal Protection Procedure: Carotid Artery Stenting without Protection |
Phase 3 |
| Study Type: | Interventional |
| Study Design: | Allocation: Randomized Endpoint Classification: Safety/Efficacy Study Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment Masking: Open Label Primary Purpose: Treatment |
| Official Title: | PROximal Protection VErsus NON-Protection in Carotid Artery Stenting (PROVENON Study) A Randomized Prospective MRI-based Trial. |
- The detection rate of new hyper-intense DWI lesion on the post-treatment compared to the pretreatment MRI imaging [ Time Frame: Day 1-3 ]
- Ipsilateral stroke (ischaemic stroke, intracerebral bleeding or both, with symptoms lasting more than 24 h) or death between treatment and 30 days after treatment [ Time Frame: Day 30 ]
- Technical Success of the procedure [ Time Frame: Day 0 ]
Subjects (both groups) who due to technical reaseons are unable to performe carotid artery stenting will be considered as technical failures.
Subjects who are unable to tolerate flow reversal (in group 2) and have their procedures completed without embolic protection or other methods will be also considered as technical failures.
- Access site vascular complications, defined as need for surgical repair or blood transfusion [ Time Frame: Day 0-7 ]
| Estimated Enrollment: | 220 |
| Study Start Date: | May 2011 |
| Estimated Study Completion Date: | June 2014 |
| Estimated Primary Completion Date: | May 2014 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure) |
| Arms | Assigned Interventions |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: Carotid Artery Stenting without Protection
Subjects will undergo carotid artery angioplasty and stenting with any CE-certificated carotid stent and without embolic protection device
|
Procedure: Carotid Artery Stenting without Protection
Carotid artery angioplasty and stenting without cerebral embolic protection
|
|
Active Comparator: Carotid Artery Stenting with Proximal Protection
Subjects will undergo carotid artery angioplasty and stenting with any CE-certificated carotid stent and with a proximal embolic protection device provided by the GORE Neuro Protection System
|
Procedure: Carotid Artery Stenting with Proximal Protection
Carotid artery angioplasty and stenting with proximal embolic protection provided by the GORE Neuro Protection System
|
Detailed Description:
Primary Objective:
The purpose of this study is to compare the rate of new ischemic brain injury detectable on MRI after carotid artery stenting between patients treated with proximal cerebral protection (Gore Flow Reversal System) and without cerebral protection.
Secondary Objective:
Impact of MRI-morphology of atherosclerotic plaque to the rate of new hyperintense diffusion weighted imaging (DWI) lesion on the post-treatment scan and to the rate of ipsilateral stroke or death.
Eligibility| Ages Eligible for Study: | 18 Years and older |
| Genders Eligible for Study: | Both |
| Accepts Healthy Volunteers: | No |
Inclusion Criteria:
- Male and female ≥ 18 years old;
- Suitable/Eligible for carotid artery revascularization;
- Significant artery stenosis in symptomatic patients defined as ≥ 50% of the artery diameter (%DS) or asymptomatic ≥ 80 %DS by angiography. Symptomatic is defined as a carotid artery stenosis associated with ipsilateral transient ischemic attack (TIA), amaurosis fugax, ischemic stroke or retinal infarction within 6 months prior to enrollment.
- Adequate clinical conditions to perform DW-MRI.
- Ability of the individual to understand the character and the consequences of clinical trial.
- Signed and dated informed consent provided before the beginning of any intervention.
- Negative pregnancy test (serum or urine) and contraception use for any woman of childbearing age. Systematic contraceptives (oral, implant, injection) and dia-phragm or condoms with spermicidal are considered reliable. Women who have undergone bilateral oophorectomy or/and hysterectomy or women status post-menopausal for at least two years are eligible for this trial.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Intracranial hemorrhage, hemorrhagic stroke, or stroke with mass effect demonstrated on CT scan or MRI within 30 days of the index procedure.
- Persisting ischemic stroke (defined as either a score > 15 on the NIH stroke scale, a Rankin score > 3 or a Barthel score < 60 measured within one week prior to study entry).
- Intracranial mass lesion (i.e., abscess, tumor, or other infection).
- peripheral vascular, supra-aortic or internal carotid artery tortuosity precluding the use of catheter-based techniques required for successful results.
- Lactation.
- Arterio-venous malformation in the territory of the target carotid artery.
- Any disease or medication that affects local hemostasis,
- Participation in other clinical trials during the present clinical trial or within the last month.
- Medical or psychological condition that would not permit completion of the trial or signing of informed consent.
Contacts and Locations| Contact: Panagiotis Papanagiotou, MD | +49684116 ext 24302 | provenon.study@me.com |
| Contact: Christian Roth, MD | +49684116 ext 24302 | provenon.study@me.com |
| Germany | |
| Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology | Recruiting |
| Homburg, Saarland, Germany, 66424 | |
| Contact: Panagiotis Papanagiotou, MD 49684116 ext 24302 provenon.study@me.com | |
| Contact: Christian Roth, MD 49684116 ext 24302 provenon.study@me.com | |
| Principal Investigator: Wolfgang Reith, MD | |
| Sub-Investigator: Panagiotis Papanagiotou, MD | |
| Sub-Investigator: Christian Roth, MD | |
| Principal Investigator: | Wolfgang Reith, MD | Saarland University Hospital |
More Information
Publications:
| Responsible Party: | Prof. Wolfgang Reith, Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology |
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT01331473 History of Changes |
| Other Study ID Numbers: | PROVENON01 |
| Study First Received: | March 30, 2011 |
| Last Updated: | December 2, 2011 |
| Health Authority: | Germany: Ethics Commission |
Keywords provided by Saarland University:
|
Carotid Artery Stenting CAS proximal protection |
Additional relevant MeSH terms:
|
Carotid Stenosis Carotid Artery Diseases Cerebrovascular Disorders Brain Diseases Central Nervous System Diseases |
Nervous System Diseases Arterial Occlusive Diseases Vascular Diseases Cardiovascular Diseases |
ClinicalTrials.gov processed this record on May 16, 2013