Pelvic Floor Muscle Function in Nulliparous and Primiparous.
- Full Text View
- Tabular View
- No Study Results Posted
- Disclaimer
- How to Read a Study Record
Purpose
This study aimed to compare the pelvic floor muscle (PFM) strength in nulliparous and primiparous women. Subjective evaluation of PFM strength was performed vaginal digital palpation (TDP). The objective evaluation of PFM strength was assessed using a portable perineometer. All parameters were performed at one moment in G1, and in G2, during the 20th and 36th weeks of pregnancy, and 45 days after the delivery. Pregnancy and vaginal delivery may cause weakness of PFM.
| Condition |
|---|
|
Investigation or Care in A Nonpregnant Woman Mother (Person) |
| Study Type: | Observational |
| Study Design: | Observational Model: Case Control Time Perspective: Prospective |
| Official Title: | COMPARATIVE STUDY OF PELVIC FLOOR MUSCLE EVALUATION IN NULIPAROUS AND PRIMIPAROUS WOMEN. A Prospective Study |
| Enrollment: | 100 |
| Study Start Date: | March 2006 |
| Study Completion Date: | September 2006 |
| Groups/Cohorts |
|---|
|
non pregnant nulliparous
Group 1
|
|
primiparous women
Group 2
|
Detailed Description:
Objective: This study aimed to compare the pelvic floor muscle (PFM) strength in nulliparous and primiparous women. Populations: The sample size was established considering a significance level of 5%, the test power of 80%, and the estimated error of 10%. According to these results and considering the range between percentages of answers as the casual error, each group was established with approximately 50 participants. Methods: 100 women were prospectively distributed into: Group G1 (n = 50) comprising by healthy nulliparous women; Group G2 (n = 50) with primiparous ones. Subjective evaluation of PFM strength was performed using transvaginal digital palpation (TDP). The objective evaluation of PFM strength was assessed using a portable perineometer. All parameters were performed at one moment in G1, and in G2, during the 20th and 36th weeks of pregnancy, and 45 days after the delivery. Results: In G2, 14 women were excluded due to the lost follow-up. The median of age was 23 years in G1 and 22, in G2, there was no statistical difference between the groups. In G1, BMI was in average 21.7 Kg/m2, and 25,0 Kg/m2 in G2, there was statistical difference between the groups (p= 0.0004). In G2, TDP evaluation showed a significant impairment of PFM strength at 36th week of pregnancy (p=0,0006) and 45 days after the vaginal delivery (p=0.0001) compared to nulliparous. Objective evaluations of PFM strength showed a significant decrease 45 days after vaginal delivery compared to nulliparas. Conclusion: Pregnancy and vaginal delivery may cause weakness of PFM.
Eligibility| Ages Eligible for Study: | 20 Years to 30 Years |
| Genders Eligible for Study: | Female |
| Accepts Healthy Volunteers: | No |
| Sampling Method: | Probability Sample |
The sample size was established considering a significance level of 5%, the test power of 80%, and the estimated error of 10%. According to these results and considering the range between percentages of answers as the casual error, each group was established with approximately 50 participants.
Inclusion Criteria:
- Nulliparous and primiparous
Exclusion Criteria:
- in G1 (nulliparous) were UI, neurological diseases, previous pelvic surgeries, diabetes, smoking and cognitive difficulties. In G2 (primiparas), the same criteria were used including women with gestational complications such as diabetes, hypertension, vaginal and urinary infection.
Contacts and Locations
More Information
No publications provided
| Responsible Party: | Prof. Trajano Sardenberg, Ethical Research Committee |
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT01315769 History of Changes |
| Other Study ID Numbers: | upeclin/HC/FMB-Unesp-51 |
| Study First Received: | March 14, 2011 |
| Last Updated: | March 14, 2011 |
| Health Authority: | Brazil: Ethics Committee |
ClinicalTrials.gov processed this record on May 19, 2013