A Study of Oral Sapacitabine in Elderly Patients With Newly Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia (SEAMLESS)
- Full Text View
- Tabular View
- No Study Results Posted
- Disclaimer
- How to Read a Study Record
Purpose
This Phase 3 study assesses two drug regimens as the initial treatment of patients who are at least 70 years of age and have newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia (AML) for whom the doctor does not recommend the use of standard intensive treatment or the patient has decided not to receive standard intensive treatment after being fully informed about its benefits and risks by his/her doctor. The two drug regimens are sapacitabine administered in alternating cycles with decitabine, or decitabine alone. The purpose of the study is to learn which drug regimen is more likely to keep AML in check as long as possible.
| Condition | Intervention | Phase |
|---|---|---|
|
Acute Myeloid Leukemia |
Drug: Sapacitabine and decitabine Drug: Decitabine |
Phase 3 |
| Study Type: | Interventional |
| Study Design: | Allocation: Randomized Endpoint Classification: Safety/Efficacy Study Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment Masking: Open Label Primary Purpose: Treatment |
| Official Title: | A Phase III Randomized Study of Oral Sapacitabine in Elderly Patients With Newly Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia |
- Overall survival [ Time Frame: up to 43 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
- Complete remission with duration [ Time Frame: Up to 43 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
- Complete remission with incomplete platelet count recovery and duration [ Time Frame: up to 43 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
- Partial remission with duration [ Time Frame: up to 43 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
- Hematological improvement with duration [ Time Frame: up to 43 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
- Stable disease with duration [ Time Frame: up to 43 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
- Number of units of blood product transfused [ Time Frame: up to 43 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- Hospitalized days [ Time Frame: up to 43 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
- 1-year survival [ Time Frame: up to 43 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
| Estimated Enrollment: | 485 |
| Study Start Date: | January 2011 |
| Estimated Study Completion Date: | April 2015 |
| Estimated Primary Completion Date: | October 2014 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure) |
| Arms | Assigned Interventions |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Arm A
Sapacitabine and decitabine
|
Drug: Sapacitabine and decitabine
Sapacitabine administered in alternating cycles with decitabine
|
|
Active Comparator: Arm C
Decitabine
|
Drug: Decitabine
Decitabine alone
|
Detailed Description:
This is a multicenter, randomized, Phase 3 study comparing two drug regimens (arms) as the front-line treatment of elderly patients aged 70 years or older with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia (AML) who are not candidates for intensive induction chemotherapy. In Arm A, sapacitabine is administered in alternating cycles with decitabine, and in Arm C decitabine is administered alone. The primary efficacy endpoint is overall survival. The study is designed to demonstrate an improvement in overall survival of Arm A versus Arm C.
Eligibility| Ages Eligible for Study: | 70 Years and older |
| Genders Eligible for Study: | Both |
| Accepts Healthy Volunteers: | No |
Inclusion Criteria:
- Newly diagnosed AML based on WHO classification
- Age 70 years or older for whom the treatment of choice is low-intensity therapy by investigator assessment or who has refused intensive induction therapy recommended by investigator
- ECOG performance status 0-2
- Adequate renal function
- Adequate liver function
- Able to swallow capsules
- Agree to practice effective contraception
- Ability to understand and willingness to sign the informed consent form
Exclusion Criteria:
- AML is of the sub-type of acute promyelocytic leukemia or extramedullary myeloid tumor without bone marrow involvement
- Having received any systemic anti-cancer therapy for AML or received treatment with hypomethylating agents or cytotoxic chemotherapy for the preceding MDS or MPD
- Known or suspected central nervous system (CNS) involvement by leukemia
- Uncontrolled intercurrent illness
- Known hypersensitivity to decitabine
- Known to be HIV-positive
Contacts and Locations| Contact: Judy H Chiao, MD | 908-517-7330 | jchiao@cyclacel.com |
Show 37 Study Locations
More Information
No publications provided
| Responsible Party: | Cyclacel Pharmaceuticals, Inc. |
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT01303796 History of Changes |
| Other Study ID Numbers: | CYC682-12 |
| Study First Received: | February 21, 2011 |
| Last Updated: | December 14, 2012 |
| Health Authority: | United States: Food and Drug Administration |
Keywords provided by Cyclacel Pharmaceuticals, Inc.:
|
AML |
Additional relevant MeSH terms:
|
Leukemia Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute Leukemia, Myeloid Neoplasms by Histologic Type Neoplasms Decitabine Antimetabolites, Antineoplastic |
Antimetabolites Molecular Mechanisms of Pharmacological Action Pharmacologic Actions Antineoplastic Agents Therapeutic Uses Enzyme Inhibitors |
ClinicalTrials.gov processed this record on May 19, 2013