Trial of Alternating Current Stimulation in Optic Neuropathy (SCT_optnerve)
- Full Text View
- Tabular View
- No Study Results Posted
- Disclaimer
- How to Read a Study Record
Purpose
Non-invasive brain stimulation can increase cortical excitability in the visual system, but it is not known if this is of clinical value. The investigators now assessed if repetitive, transcranial alternating current stimulation (rtACS) can improve visual field size in patients with optic nerve damage. The investigators hypothesized that rtACS would improve visual functions within the defective visual field sectors of the visual field (primary outcome measure).
| Condition | Intervention | Phase |
|---|---|---|
|
Optic Nerve Diseases Optic Nerve Injuries Optic Neuropathies |
Device: Repetitive transorbital alternating current stimulation |
Phase 2 |
| Study Type: | Interventional |
| Study Design: | Allocation: Randomized Endpoint Classification: Efficacy Study Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment Masking: Double Blind (Subject, Outcomes Assessor) Primary Purpose: Treatment |
| Official Title: | Treatment of Patients With Optic Neuropathy Using Transorbital Alternating Current Stimulation - a Randomized Trial |
- Detection accuracy (DA) change in percent over baseline within defective visual field sectors [ Time Frame: Nov 2006 - Dec 2010 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]Central visual fields were assessed with computer-based high-resolution perimetry (HRP). Based on such plots, areas of the visual field were characterized as intact, partially damaged or absolutely impaired (blind). Detection accuracy (DA) change in percent above baseline within defective visual field sectors was defined as the primary outcome criterion.
- Other visual and EEG parameters [ Time Frame: Nov 2006 - Dec 2010 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]Secondary outcome parameters included DA in static and kinetic perimetry, reaction time (RT) in HRP, visual acuity (VA), contrast vision, and EEG power spectra.
| Enrollment: | 22 |
| Study Start Date: | November 2006 |
| Study Completion Date: | December 2010 |
| Primary Completion Date: | December 2010 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure) |
| Arms | Assigned Interventions |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: rtACS (Verum condition)
Repetitive transorbital alternating current stimulation (rtACS)
|
Device: Repetitive transorbital alternating current stimulation
Repetitive, transorbital alternating current stimulation (rtACS) was applied with a multi-channel device generating weak current pulses in predetermined firing bursts of 2 to 9 pulses. The amplitude of each current pulse was below 1000µA. Current intensity was individually adjusted according to how well patients perceived phosphenes, i.e. any sensation of flickering light in response to the rtACS stimulation.
Other Name: EBS Alpha Synch
|
|
No Intervention: Sham stimulation (placebo condition)
A clicking sound was presented and the same electrode montage set-up was used during rtACS- and placebo-stimulation, except that placebo patients received no current (stimulator turned off)
|
Detailed Description:
In a prospective, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial 22 patients with optic nerve damage were randomly assigned to a rtACS- (n=12) or placebo-group (n=10). Visual field measures, visual acuity and EEG-recordings were collected before and after a daily 20-40min treatment for 10-days and at a 2-months-follow-up. Primary outcome measure was detection accuracy (DA) in defective visual field sectors of computer-based high resolution perimetry (HRP). Secondary outcome parameters included DA in static and kinetic perimetry, reaction time (RT) in HRP, visual acuity (VA), contrast vision, and EEG power spectra.
Eligibility| Ages Eligible for Study: | 18 Years to 70 Years |
| Genders Eligible for Study: | Both |
| Accepts Healthy Volunteers: | No |
Inclusion Criteria
- patients with optic nerve lesion
- stable visual field defect with residual vision
- lesion age at least 6 months
Exclusion Criteria
- heart pacemakers and any metal artefacts in head and truncus
- epileptic seizure within the last 3 years
- photosensitive epilepsy as determined by EEG
- mental diseases (schizophrenia etc.)
- unstable diabetes, diabetes causing diabetic retinopathy
- macular degeneration, maculopathy with decimal visual acuity below 0.4
- high blood pressure
- instable or high level of intraocular pressure (i.e. >27 mmHg)
- presence of an un-operated tumor anywhere in the body
- total blindness
- primary or secondary glaucoma
- pathological nystagmus
Contacts and Locations| Germany | |
| Institute of Medical Psychology | |
| Magdeburg, Germany, 39120 | |
| Principal Investigator: | Bernhard A Sabel, PhD | University of Magdeburg |
More Information
Additional Information:
No publications provided
| Responsible Party: | Bernhard A. Sabel, University of Magdeburg |
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT01270126 History of Changes |
| Other Study ID Numbers: | EBS_optnerve_SCT |
| Study First Received: | January 3, 2011 |
| Last Updated: | January 4, 2011 |
| Health Authority: | Germany: Ethics Commission |
Keywords provided by University of Magdeburg:
|
optic neuropathy alternating current stimulation vision recovery restoration plasticity |
Additional relevant MeSH terms:
|
Nervous System Diseases Optic Nerve Diseases Optic Nerve Injuries Demyelinating Diseases Polyneuropathies Nerve Compression Syndromes Neurologic Manifestations Neurotoxicity Syndromes Cranial Nerve Diseases Eye Diseases |
Cranial Nerve Injuries Craniocerebral Trauma Trauma, Nervous System Wounds and Injuries Peripheral Nervous System Diseases Neuromuscular Diseases Signs and Symptoms Poisoning Substance-Related Disorders |
ClinicalTrials.gov processed this record on June 18, 2013