Two Approaches to Routine HIV Testing in a Hospital Emergency Department (USHER)
- Full Text View
- Tabular View
- Study Results
- Disclaimer
- How to Read a Study Record
Purpose
This study was initially designed to compare the effectiveness of two different approaches to providing routine HIV counseling, testing, and referral services in an urban hospital emergency department setting. The initial phase was closed in July 2008. The second phase of this trial consists of establishing the differences in acceptability of HIV testing based on the method of testing offered (rapid oral fluid vs. fingerstick).
| Condition | Intervention |
|---|---|
|
HIV Infections |
Procedure: Oral HIV screening Procedure: Fingerstick HIV screening |
| Study Type: | Interventional |
| Study Design: | Allocation: Randomized Endpoint Classification: Efficacy Study Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment Masking: Open Label Primary Purpose: Screening |
| Official Title: | Optimizing Strategies for Universal HIV Testing (The USHER Trial): Phase II |
- Acceptability of the HIV Test [ Time Frame: Assess on day subject enrolled into the study ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]The primary outcome measure was HIV test acceptance rate defined by the proportion of participants whom accepted HIV testing among those randomized within each trial arm (fingerstick or oral fluid).
| Enrollment: | 1651 |
| Study Start Date: | May 2009 |
| Study Completion Date: | January 2010 |
| Primary Completion Date: | January 2010 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure) |
| Arms | Assigned Interventions |
|---|---|
| Experimental: Oral HIV testing |
Procedure: Oral HIV screening
Participants will undergo oral HIV screening and, if positive, further study visits for up to 6 months
|
| Active Comparator: Fingerstick HIV testing |
Procedure: Fingerstick HIV screening
Participants will undergo fingerstick HIV screening and, if positive, further study visits for up to 6 months
|
Detailed Description:
About 25% of HIV infected people do not know that they are infected. These people lack medical care that could prolong their lives and access to counseling services that could prevent further spread of HIV. With so many people unaware of their HIV status, there is a clear need for more readily available HIV counseling, testing, and referral services throughout the United States. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) recommends routine HIV testing in U.S. hospitals in which HIV infected patients make up at least 1% of the total patient population for that hospital. In the original proposal, we chose oral rapid HIV testing as we felt that this technique is noninvasive, acceptable to both patients and health care workers (without body fluid risk), and would maximize rates of HIV testing. This study directly compares acceptance rates of HIV testing as a function of the test type offered (oral vs. fingerstick) in a randomized controlled fashion.
Participants in this study will include adults who visit Brigham and Women's Hospital emergency department in Boston, Massachusetts. Participants will be randomly assigned to oral vs. fingerstick HIV testing by a designated HIV counselor and to fill out a questionnaire while waiting in the emergency room. The questionnaire will be anonymous. Participants will then be offered a rapid HIV test. Test results will be available in about 20 minutes and will be provided to participants by the HIV counselor. Participants who test positive for HIV will be offered a more definitive blood test to confirm HIV infection. The blood test results will be available 2 weeks from testing, and participants must return to the hospital to get their test results. Participants who test positive for HIV will be offered counseling support and referral services by either their assigned HIV counselor or emergency department staff member. Follow-up care appointments will also be initiated at this time. For participants who test positive for HIV, the study will last about 6 months. There will be no follow-up visits for participants who do not test positive for HIV during their emergency room visit.
Eligibility| Ages Eligible for Study: | 18 Years and older |
| Genders Eligible for Study: | Both |
| Accepts Healthy Volunteers: | No |
Inclusion Criteria:
- Waiting to receive care in the Brigham and Women's Hospital emergency room
- English- or Spanish-speaking
- Enters the emergency room when an HIV counselor is available
Exclusion Criteria:
- An estimated severity index score of 1 or 2 who have mechanical ventilation or are not deemed alert, awake, and oriented to person, place and time by the triage nurse
- HIV infected
Contacts and Locations| United States, Massachusetts | |
| Brigham and Women's Hospital | |
| Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02115 | |
| Principal Investigator: | Rochelle P Walensky, MD, MPH | Massachusetts General Hospital |
More Information
No publications provided by Massachusetts General Hospital
Additional publications automatically indexed to this study by ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier (NCT Number):
| Responsible Party: | Rochelle Walensky, Associate Professor, Massachusetts General Hospital |
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT01258582 History of Changes |
| Other Study ID Numbers: | R01 MH073445 (Phase II), R01MH073445 |
| Study First Received: | December 10, 2010 |
| Results First Received: | May 3, 2012 |
| Last Updated: | June 10, 2012 |
| Health Authority: | United States: Federal Government |
Keywords provided by Massachusetts General Hospital:
|
HIV Testing HIV Seronegativity |
Additional relevant MeSH terms:
|
HIV Infections Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome Lentivirus Infections Retroviridae Infections RNA Virus Infections Virus Diseases Sexually Transmitted Diseases, Viral Sexually Transmitted Diseases |
Immunologic Deficiency Syndromes Immune System Diseases Slow Virus Diseases HIV Antibodies Immunologic Factors Physiological Effects of Drugs Pharmacologic Actions |
ClinicalTrials.gov processed this record on June 18, 2013