The Efficacy of Adductor-Canal-Block (ACB) in Patients After Knee Arthroscopy
This study has been completed.
Sponsor:
Glostrup University Hospital, Copenhagen
Information provided by (Responsible Party):
Malene Espelund, Glostrup University Hospital, Copenhagen
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT01254825
First received: December 6, 2010
Last updated: September 9, 2012
Last verified: September 2012
- Full Text View
- Tabular View
- No Study Results Posted
- Disclaimer
- How to Read a Study Record
Purpose
The Purpose of this study is to determine whether Adductor-Canal-Block (ACB) is superior to placebo when it comes to analgetic efficacy after Knee-Arthroscopy.
| Condition | Intervention | Phase |
|---|---|---|
|
Meniscus Lesion Pain (Knee) Diagnostic Knee Artroscopy Minor Knee Surgery |
Procedure: Adductor-Canal-Block, Ropivacain Procedure: Adductor Canal Block, Placebo (saline) |
Phase 4 |
| Study Type: | Interventional |
| Study Design: | Allocation: Randomized Endpoint Classification: Safety/Efficacy Study Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment Masking: Double Blind (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor) Primary Purpose: Treatment |
| Official Title: | The Efficacy of Adductor-Canal-Block (ACB) in Patients After Knee Arthroscopy |
Resource links provided by NLM:
Further study details as provided by Glostrup University Hospital, Copenhagen:
Primary Outcome Measures:
- Pain-Score (VAS) - patient standing [ Time Frame: 2 hours postoperative ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]Pain-score messured on a Visual Analog Scale (VAS) 2 hours after adductor canal block. Patient standing. Intervention-group vs. placebo-group.
Secondary Outcome Measures:
- Pain-score (VAS), patient at rest [ Time Frame: 0,1,2,4,6,8,24 hours postoperative ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]ACB-group vs. placebo
- Pain-score (VAS), patient standing [ Time Frame: 1,2,4,6,8,24 hours postoperative ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]ACB-group vs. placebo
- Pain-score (VAS), after 5 meters of walk [ Time Frame: 2,4,6,8,24 hours postoperative ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]ACB-group vs. placebo
- Total Opioid-consumption [ Time Frame: 0-24 hours postoperative ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]ACB-group vs. placebo-group
- Opioid-consumption, postoperative [ Time Frame: 0-2, 2-4, 4-6, 6-8, 8-24 hours postoperative ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]i.v. morfin 0-2 hours postoperative tbl. morfin 2-24 hours postoperative ACB vs. placebo
- Postoperative Nausea and vomiting [ Time Frame: 0-1, 1-2, 2-4, 4-6, 6-8, 8-24 hours postoperative ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]Rating-scale 0-3 ACB-group vs. placebo-group
- Postoperative ondansetron consumption [ Time Frame: In-hospital ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]ACB-group vs. placebo-group
- Sedation [ Time Frame: 0,1,2,4,6,8,24 hours postoperative ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]Rating-scale: 0-3 ACB-group vs. placebo-group
| Enrollment: | 72 |
| Study Start Date: | November 2010 |
| Study Completion Date: | September 2011 |
| Primary Completion Date: | September 2011 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure) |
| Arms | Assigned Interventions |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Adductor-Canal-Block, Ropivacain
Adductor-Canal-Block, 30 mL Ropivacain 7,5 mg/mL. Single dose. Ultrasound-guided application. 36 patients
|
Procedure: Adductor-Canal-Block, Ropivacain
Ultrasound-guided ACB; 30 mL Ropivacain 7,5 mg/mL. Single dose.
Other Name: Naropin (Ropivacain)
|
|
Placebo Comparator: Adductor-Canal-Block (ACB) - Saline
Adductor-Canal-Block, Placebo (30 mL Saline). Ultrasound-guided application. 36 patients.
|
Procedure: Adductor Canal Block, Placebo (saline)
Ultrasound-guided Adductor Canal Block; 30 mL Saline. Single dose.
|
Eligibility| Ages Eligible for Study: | 18 Years to 80 Years |
| Genders Eligible for Study: | Both |
| Accepts Healthy Volunteers: | Yes |
Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- 18-80 years
- Knee-arthroscopy
- Written consent
- ASA I-III
- BMI 19-35
Exclusion Criteria:
- Unable to communicate in Danish
- Allergic reactions toward drugs used in the trial
- Pregnancy
- Abuse of alcohol/drugs
- Daily opioid intake
- Infection at injection site
- Can not be mobilised to 5 meters of walk; pre-surgery
Contacts and Locations
Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01254825
Locations
| Denmark | |
| Department of Anaesthesiology, Glostrup University Hospital | |
| Glostrup, Copenhagen, Denmark, 2600 | |
Sponsors and Collaborators
Glostrup University Hospital, Copenhagen
Investigators
| Principal Investigator: | Malene Espelund, MD | Glostrup University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark |
More Information
No publications provided
| Responsible Party: | Malene Espelund, MD, Glostrup University Hospital, Copenhagen |
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT01254825 History of Changes |
| Other Study ID Numbers: | SM2-ME-10 |
| Study First Received: | December 6, 2010 |
| Last Updated: | September 9, 2012 |
| Health Authority: | Denmark: Danish Dataprotection Agency Denmark: Danish Medicines Agency Denmark: Ethics Committee Denmark: National Board of Health |
Keywords provided by Glostrup University Hospital, Copenhagen:
|
Adductor Canal Block (ACB) Diagnostic Knee Arthroscopy Saphenous nerve Pain Ultrasound block |
ClinicalTrials.gov processed this record on June 17, 2013