Management of Complex Wounds Using a Constant Tension External Tissue Expander
- Full Text View
- Tabular View
- No Study Results Posted
- Disclaimer
- How to Read a Study Record
Purpose
Complex wounds that cannot be closed primarily are at great risk for complications. A new technique utilizing external tissue expansion holds promise in rapidly decreasing wound area. Facilitation of rapid wound closure is critical in preventing wound complications.
Hypothesis:
Using the Dermaclose Wound Management System (Woundcare Technologies, Inc., Chanhassen, MN) in complex wounds not able to be primarily closed will decrease the time to secondary closure and decrease the need for secondary soft tissue coverage procedures, or if secondary soft tissue procedures are required, its use will decrease the size and complexity of the secondary soft tissue procedures.
Null Hypothesis:
The Dermaclose system will not decrease the need, dimensions, or complexity of secondary soft tissue coverage procedures in complex wounds not able to be primarily closed.
| Condition | Intervention |
|---|---|
|
Wounds and Injuries |
Device: DermaClose external tissue expander |
| Study Type: | Interventional |
| Study Design: | Allocation: Non-Randomized Endpoint Classification: Efficacy Study Intervention Model: Single Group Assignment Masking: Open Label Primary Purpose: Treatment |
| Official Title: | Management of Complex Wounds Using a Constant Tension External Tissue Expander |
- Performance of DermaClose system in treatment of complex soft-tissue wounds [ Time Frame: One year ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]Initial and final wound dimensions; secondary soft tissue coverage procedures; dimensions and type of secondary soft tissue coverage procedures required compared to initial wound dimensions; method of wound closure; days to wound closure; number and types of procedures required for wound closure; infection requiring reoperation; wound dehiscence requiring reoperation
- Superficial wound complications [ Time Frame: One year ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]Superficial wound dehiscence and/or infection not requiring reoperation
- Pain [ Time Frame: One year ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]Visual Analog Pain Scale (VAS) with DermaClose use, and on study wound at 2 weeks, 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months
- Quality of Life [ Time Frame: One year ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]Quality of Life measured by the SF-12 version 1 at 2 weeks, 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months
- Cost-to-Benefit ratio of DermaClose use [ Time Frame: One year ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]Costs associated with device use including hospital days, number of procedures, procedural and hospital costs including device, negative pressure wound therapy costs, and operating room time and associated costs
| Estimated Enrollment: | 50 |
| Study Start Date: | July 2010 |
| Estimated Study Completion Date: | July 2013 |
| Estimated Primary Completion Date: | July 2012 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure) |
| Arms | Assigned Interventions |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: DermaClose Group
DermaClose device applied to complex soft-tissue wound, with or without negative pressure wound therapy, and prospectively followed for primary and secondary outcomes for one year.
|
Device: DermaClose external tissue expander
The DermaClose external tissue expander provides continuous expanding of the skin around a wound until it has stretched enough to suture the wound edges closed.
|
Detailed Description:
Upon IRB approval, 50 patients with complex soft tissue wounds, with or without an associated fracture that cannot be closed primarily will have the Dermaclose device applied and will be prospectively followed for 1 year. The Dermaclose device will be applied according to the manufacturer's guidelines. This device may be combined with the use of Negative Pressure Wound Therapy. Primary and secondary end points will be recorded.
Primary end points include:
- Initial and final wound dimensions
- Secondary soft tissue coverage procedures
- Dimensions and type of secondary soft tissue coverage procedures required compared to initial wound dimensions
- Method of wound closure
- Days to wound closure
- Number and types of procedures required for wound closure
- Infection requiring reoperation
- Wound dehiscence requiring reoperation
Secondary end points include:
- Superficial wound dehiscence not requiring reoperation
- Superficial wound infection not requiring reoperation
- Visual Analog Pain Scale (VAS) with Dermaclose use
- Use of negative pressure wound therapy
- Cost-to-benefit ratio of Dermaclose use - hospital days, number of procedures, procedural and hospital costs including device, negative pressure wound therapy costs, and operating room time and associated costs
Patients will be evaluated daily during their inpatient hospital stays for VAS related to the wound for which the Dermaclose device is used. If the Dermaclose device is used on an outpatient basis, the patient will be asked to complete a daily VAS at the same time to monitor pain associated with device use. After hospital discharge, the patients will be evaluated at 2 weeks, 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months. They will complete an SF-12 as part of the above evaluations. Patients may be evaluated at more frequent intervals if the need arises. Primary and secondary endpoints will be evaluated at each time point.
Eligibility| Ages Eligible for Study: | 18 Years and older |
| Genders Eligible for Study: | Both |
| Accepts Healthy Volunteers: | No |
Inclusion Criteria:
- Age 18 or greater
- Has soft tissue wound(s) that are unable to be closed primarily
Exclusion Criteria:
- Age less than 18
- Has wound(s) that can be closed primarily
- Infected wound
- Unable to comply with protocol
- Prior radiation treatment to skin or soft tissues in the area of the wound
- Friable wound margins
Contacts and Locations| Contact: Brett D. Crist, MD | 573-882-6562 | cristb@health.missouri.edu |
| United States, Missouri | |
| University of Missouri Hospital and Clinics | Recruiting |
| Columbia, Missouri, United States, 65212 | |
| Sub-Investigator: Gregory J. Della Rocca, MD | |
| Sub-Investigator: James Stannard, MD | |
| Principal Investigator: | Brett D. Crist, MD | University of Missouri-Columbia |
More Information
No publications provided
| Responsible Party: | Brett Crist, MD, University of Missouri |
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT01171521 History of Changes |
| Other Study ID Numbers: | IRB1162777 |
| Study First Received: | July 27, 2010 |
| Last Updated: | March 2, 2011 |
| Health Authority: | United States: Institutional Review Board |
Additional relevant MeSH terms:
|
Wounds and Injuries |
ClinicalTrials.gov processed this record on May 16, 2013