Double Balloon Catheter Versus Dinoprostone Vaginal Insert for Cervical Ripening.
This study has been completed.
Sponsor:
Università degli Studi dell'Insubria
Information provided by (Responsible Party):
Antonella Cromi, Università degli Studi dell'Insubria
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT01170819
First received: July 23, 2010
Last updated: December 9, 2011
Last verified: December 2011
- Full Text View
- Tabular View
- No Study Results Posted
- Disclaimer
- How to Read a Study Record
Purpose
To compare the efficacy of transcervical double balloon catheters versus controlled release dinoprostone vaginal inserts for pre-induction cervical ripening in term women with unfavourable cervices.
| Condition | Intervention | Phase |
|---|---|---|
|
Cervical Ripening Labor Induction |
Device: Double balloon catheter Drug: Dinoprostone 10 mg controlled-release vaginal insert |
Phase 4 |
| Study Type: | Interventional |
| Study Design: | Allocation: Randomized Endpoint Classification: Efficacy Study Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment Masking: Open Label Primary Purpose: Treatment |
| Official Title: | Double Balloon Catheter Versus Vaginal PGE2 for Pre-induction Cervical Ripening: a Randomized Study. |
Resource links provided by NLM:
Further study details as provided by Università degli Studi dell'Insubria:
Primary Outcome Measures:
- Vaginal delivery within 24 hours [ Time Frame: 24 hours from start of cervical ripening ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
Secondary Outcome Measures:
- Cesarean section rate [ Time Frame: 48 hours from start of ripening ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
- Onset of active labor [ Time Frame: 36 hours from start of ripening ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]Active labor is defined as at least 4 uterine contractions in a 30 minutes interval with a totally effaced cervix and a cervical dilatation ≥3 cm
- Uterine hyperstimulation [ Time Frame: 12 hours (double ballon catheter arm) and 24 hours (dinoprostone vaginal insert arm) from start of ripening ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
| Enrollment: | 210 |
| Study Start Date: | June 2010 |
| Study Completion Date: | December 2011 |
| Primary Completion Date: | September 2011 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure) |
| Arms | Assigned Interventions |
|---|---|
| Active Comparator: Dinoprostone Vaginal Insert |
Drug: Dinoprostone 10 mg controlled-release vaginal insert
Vaginal insert is placed in the posterior vaginal fornix for a maximum period of 24 hours.
Other Name: PROPESS®, Ferring Pharmaceuticals
|
| Experimental: Double Balloon Catheter |
Device: Double balloon catheter
The balloons either side of the cervix are inflated with 50 ml of water. The catheter is removed after 12 hours if spontaneous expulsion has not occurred.
Other Name: COOK CERVICAL BALLOON, COOK UROLOGICAL INC. US
|
Eligibility| Ages Eligible for Study: | 18 Years and older |
| Genders Eligible for Study: | Female |
| Accepts Healthy Volunteers: | No |
Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- singleton gestation
- gestational age greater than 34 weeks
- cephalic presentation
- intact membranes
- Bishop score of ≤4
- reactive fetal heart rate (FHR) pattern on admission
Exclusion Criteria:
- any condition precluding vaginal delivery
- any contraindication to receiving prostaglandins, including history of asthma, glaucoma, or cardiac or cardiovascular disease
- previous cesarean section or other uterine incision
Contacts and Locations
More Information
No publications provided
| Responsible Party: | Antonella Cromi, PhD, Università degli Studi dell'Insubria |
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT01170819 History of Changes |
| Other Study ID Numbers: | 1229 |
| Study First Received: | July 23, 2010 |
| Last Updated: | December 9, 2011 |
| Health Authority: | Italy: Ethics Committee |
Keywords provided by Università degli Studi dell'Insubria:
|
Cervical ripening Induction of labor Prostaglandins Mechanical methods Balloon catheter |
Additional relevant MeSH terms:
|
Dinoprostone Oxytocics Reproductive Control Agents |
Physiological Effects of Drugs Pharmacologic Actions Therapeutic Uses |
ClinicalTrials.gov processed this record on May 16, 2013