Efficacy and Safety of 3 Doses of Tiotropium Compared to Placebo in Adolescents (12 to 17 Yrs) With Moderate Asthma
This study has been completed.
Sponsor:
Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals
Collaborator:
Pfizer
Information provided by (Responsible Party):
Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT01122680
First received: May 11, 2010
Last updated: July 10, 2012
Last verified: July 2012
- Full Text View
- Tabular View
- Study Results
- Disclaimer
- How to Read a Study Record
Purpose
The primary objective of this trial is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of tiotropium 1.25 mcg (2 actuations of 0.625 mcg), tiotropium 2.5 mcg (2 actuations of 1.25 mcg) and tiotropium 5 mcg (2 actuations of 2.5 mcg) once daily in the evening delivered by the Respimat inhaler in adolescents (12 to 17 yrs) with moderate persistent asthma, compared to placebo and on top of maintenance therapy with an inhaled corticosteroid controller medication. It is a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled Phase II trial with incomplete cross-over design. Patients need to be still symptomatic, i. e. not fully controlled with their maintenance treatment.
| Condition | Intervention | Phase |
|---|---|---|
|
Asthma |
Drug: Tiotropium bromide Drug: tiotropium bromide Drug: Placebo |
Phase 2 |
| Study Type: | Interventional |
| Study Design: | Allocation: Randomized Endpoint Classification: Safety/Efficacy Study Intervention Model: Crossover Assignment Masking: Double-Blind Primary Purpose: Treatment |
| Official Title: | A Phase II Randomised, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Incomplete Crossover Trial With 4-week Treatment Periods to Evaluate Efficacy and Safety of Tiotropium Inhalation Solution (Doses of 1.25 µg, 2.5 µg and 5 µg) Delivered Via Respimat® Inhaler Once Daily in the Evening in Adolescents (12 to 17 Yrs Old) With Moderate Persistent Asthma |
Resource links provided by NLM:
MedlinePlus related topics:
Asthma
Drug Information available for:
Tiotropium bromide
U.S. FDA Resources
Further study details as provided by Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals:
Primary Outcome Measures:
- Forced Expiratory Volume (FEV1) Peak (0-3h) Response [ Time Frame: Baseline and 4 weeks ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]The FEV1 peak (0-3h) response is determined at the end of the 4 week treatment period. This is the difference between the maximum FEV1 measured within the first 3 hours post dosing and the FEV1 baseline measurement. Analysis adjusted for treatment, period, patient and baseline using a mixed model.
Secondary Outcome Measures:
- Trough FEV1 Response [ Time Frame: Baseline and 4 weeks ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]The trough FEV1 is defined as the pre-dose FEV1 measured just prior to the last administration of randomised treatment. Response was defined as the change from baseline. Analysis adjusted for treatment, period, patient and baseline using a mixed model.
- FEV1 Area Under the Curve From 0 to 3 h (AUC0-3h) Response [ Time Frame: Baseline and 4 weeks ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]FEV1 (AUC0-3h) will be calculated as the area under the curve from 0 to 3hours using the trapezoidal rule divided by the observation time (3 hours) to report in litres. Response was defined as the change from baseline. Analysis adjusted for treatment, period, patient and baseline using a mixed model.
- FEV1 Individual Measurements Response at Each Time-point [ Time Frame: Baseline and 4 weeks (10 min pre-dose, 30 min, 1,2,3 hours post-dose) ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]Individual FEV1 measurements at each time-point ("personal best"). Response was defined as the change from baseline. Analysis adjusted for treatment, period, patient and baseline using a mixed model.
- Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) Peak (0-3h) Response [ Time Frame: Baseline and 4 weeks ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]The FVC peak (0-3h) response is determined at the end of the 4 week treatment period. This is the difference between the maximum FVC measured within the first 3 hours post dosing and the FVC baseline measurement. Analysis adjusted for treatment, period, patient and baseline using a mixed model.
- FVC Trough Response [ Time Frame: Baseline and 4 weeks ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]The trough FVC response is defined as the pre-dose FVC measured just prior to the last administration of randomised treatment. Response was defined as the change from baseline. Analysis adjusted for treatment, period, patient and baseline using a mixed model.
- FVC Area Under the Curve From 0 to 3 h (AUC0-3h) Response [ Time Frame: Baseline and 4 weeks ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]FVC (AUC0-3h) will be calculated as the area under the curve from 0 to 3hours using the trapezoidal rule divided by the observation time (3 hours) to report in litres. Response was defined as the change from baseline. Analysis adjusted for treatment, period, patient and baseline using a mixed model.
- FVC Individual Measurements at Each Time-point [ Time Frame: Baseline and 4 weeks (10 min pre-dose, 30 min, 1,2,3 hours post-dose) ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]Individual FVC measurements at each time-point ("personal best"). Response was defined as the change from baseline. Analysis adjusted for treatment, period, patient and baseline using a mixed model.
- Forced Expiratory Flow (FEF) 25-75% Individual Measurements Response at Each Time Point [ Time Frame: Baseline and 4 weeks (10 min pre-dose, 30 min, 1,2,3 hours post-dose) ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]FEF 25-75% is the mean forced expiratory flow between 25% and 75% of the FVC determined at the end of the 4-week treatment period. This is often referred to as the maximum midexpiratory flow. Analysis adjusted for treatment, period, patient and baseline using a mixed model.
- Mean Morning Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF) Response [ Time Frame: Baseline and 4 weeks ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]Mean morning PEF assessed by patients at home. Response was defined as the change from baseline. Analysis adjusted for treatment, period, patient and baseline using a mixed model.
- Mean Evening PEF Response [ Time Frame: Baseline and 4 weeks ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]Mean evening PEF assessed by patients at home. Response was defined as the change from baseline. Analysis adjusted for treatment, period, patient and baseline using a mixed model.
- Change From Baseline in the Number of Puffs of Rescue Medication Per Day [ Time Frame: Baseline and 4 weeks ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]Mean number of inhalations (puffs) of unscheduled rescue salbutamol therapy during whole day. Analysis adjusted for treatment, period, patient and baseline using a mixed model.
- Control of Asthma as Assessed by Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ) [ Time Frame: 4 weeks ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]ACQ is a questionnaire consisting of a seven point Likert scale ranging from 0 to 6, whereby 0 represents good control and 6 represents poor control of asthma. The scale describes the frequency and severity of asthma symptoms. Analysis adjusted for treatment, period, patient and baseline using a mixed model.
- Change From Baseline in Mean Number of Nighttime Awakenings [ Time Frame: Baseline and last week of treatment (week 4) ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]Mean number of nighttime awakenings due to asthma symptoms as assessed by patients eDiary incorporated in the AM3® device. Analysis adjusted for treatment, period, patient and baseline using a mixed model.
| Enrollment: | 105 |
| Study Start Date: | May 2010 |
| Primary Completion Date: | April 2011 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure) |
| Arms | Assigned Interventions |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Treatment A
patients inhale 2 puffs (dose of 1.25 mcg) once daily in the evening via Respimat inhaler
|
Drug: Tiotropium bromide
inhalation solution, dose of 1.25 mcg (2 puffs of 0.625 mcg)
|
|
Experimental: Treatment C
patients inhale 2 puffs (dose of 5 mcg) once daily in the evening via Respimat inhaler
|
Drug: tiotropium bromide
inhalation solution, dose of 5 mcg (2 puffs of 2.5 mcg)
|
|
Placebo Comparator: Placebo
patients inhale 2 puffs of placebo matching tiotropium once daily in the evening via Respimat inhaler
|
Drug: Placebo
placebo inhalation solution
|
|
Experimental: Treatment B
patients inhale 2 puffs (dose of 2.5 mcg) once daily in the evening via Respimat inhaler
|
Drug: tiotropium bromide
inhalation solution, dose of 2.5 mcg (2 puffs of 1.25 mcg)
|
Eligibility| Ages Eligible for Study: | 12 Years to 17 Years |
| Genders Eligible for Study: | Both |
| Accepts Healthy Volunteers: | No |
Criteria
Inclusion criteria:
- All patients and legally accepted caregiver(s) must sign and date an Informed Consent form consistent with Good Clinical Practice (GCP) guidelines of the International Conference on Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for Registration of Pharmaceuticals for Human Use (ICH) and local legislation prior to participation in the trial.
- Male or female patients between 12 and 17 years of age.
- All patients must have at least a 3 months history of asthma and fulfill the diagnostic criteria of moderate persistent asthma, according to the current Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) guidelines at the time of enrolment into the trial.
- All patients must have been on maintenance treatment with inhaled corticosteroids at a stable medium dose for at least 4 weeks before Visit 1.
- All patients must be symptomatic (partly controlled) at Visit 1 (screening) and prior to randomisation at Visit 2 as defined by an Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ) mean score of equal or above 1.5.
- All patients must have a pre-bronchodilator FEV1 above 60% and less than or equal 90% of predicted normal at Visit 1. Variation of absolute FEV1 values of Visit 1 (pre-bronchodilator) as compared to Visit 2 (pre-dose) must be within ± 30%.
- All patients must have an increase in FEV1 of equal or above 12% and 200 mL 15 min. after 400 mcg salbutamol (albuterol) at Visit 1. If patients in the lower age range (e.g., 12 to 14 year olds) exhibit a very small total lung volume, positive reversibility testing might be based solely on the relative (12%) post-bronchodilator response.
- All patients should be never-smokers or ex-smokers who stopped smoking at least one year prior to enrolment.
- Patients should be able to use the Respimat® inhaler correctly.
- Patients must be able to perform all trial related procedures including technically acceptable spirometric manoeuvres, according to American Thoracic Society (ATS) standards and the use of the electronic diary/peak flow meter.
Exclusion criteria:
- Patients with a significant disease other than asthma.
- Patients with a history of congenital or acquired heart disease, and/or have been hospitalised for cardiac syncope or failure during the past year.
- Patients with any unstable or life-threatening cardiac arrhythmia or cardiac arrhythmia requiring intervention (e. g. pacemaker implantation) or a change in drug therapy within the past year.
- Patients with malignancy for which the patient has undergone resection, radiation therapy or chemotherapy within the last five years.
- Patients with lung diseases other than asthma, e.g. cystic fibrosis (CF). In case of ex-premature infants, a history of significant bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) will be regarded as exclusion criterion
- Patients with significant alcohol or drug abuse within the past two years.
- Patients with known hypersensitivity to anticholinergic drugs, benzalkonium chloride (BAC), ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) or any other components of the tiotropium inhalation solution.
- Pregnant or nursing adolescent female patients, including female patients with a positive Beta HCG (serum pregnancy) testing at screening (visit 1).
- Sexually active female patients of child-bearing potential not using a highly effective method of birth control.
- Patients with a known narrow-angle glaucoma, or any other disease where anticholinergic treatment is contraindicated.
- Patients with renal impairment, as defined by a creatinine clearance less than 50 mL/min/1.73 m2 body surface area (BSA) as calculated by Schwartz Formula.
Contacts and Locations
Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01122680
Locations
| United States, Colorado | |
| 205.424.01002 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site | |
| Denver, Colorado, United States | |
| United States, Missouri | |
| 205.424.01006 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site | |
| Columbia, Missouri, United States | |
| 205.424.01007 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site | |
| Warrensburg, Missouri, United States | |
| United States, Nebraska | |
| 205.424.01004 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site | |
| Boys Town, Nebraska, United States | |
| United States, Ohio | |
| 205.424.01001 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site | |
| Canton, Ohio, United States | |
| Germany | |
| 205.424.49007 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site | |
| Koblenz, Germany | |
| 205.424.49004 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site | |
| Rosenheim, Germany | |
| 205.424.49002 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site | |
| Wesel, Germany | |
| Latvia | |
| 205.424.37104 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site | |
| Balvi, Latvia | |
| 205.424.37103 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site | |
| Daugavpils, Latvia | |
| 205.424.37105 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site | |
| Rezekne, Latvia | |
| 205.424.37102 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site | |
| Riga, Latvia | |
| 205.424.37101 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site | |
| Riga, Latvia | |
| Lithuania | |
| 205.424.37004 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site | |
| Vilnius, Lithuania | |
| 205.424.37003 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site | |
| Vilnius, Lithuania | |
| 205.424.37001 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site | |
| Vilnius, Lithuania | |
| Slovenia | |
| 205.424.38604 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site | |
| Kamnik, Slovenia | |
| 205.424.38605 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site | |
| Ljubljana, Slovenia | |
| 205.424.38602 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site | |
| Maribor, Slovenia | |
Sponsors and Collaborators
Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals
Pfizer
Investigators
| Study Chair: | Boehringer Ingelheim | Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals |
More Information
Additional Information:
Related Info 
Related Info 
No publications provided
| Responsible Party: | Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals |
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT01122680 History of Changes |
| Other Study ID Numbers: | 205.424, 2009-017745-55 |
| Study First Received: | May 11, 2010 |
| Results First Received: | April 10, 2012 |
| Last Updated: | July 10, 2012 |
| Health Authority: | Germany: Federal Institute for Drugs and Medical Devices Latvia: State Agency of Medicines Lithuania: State Medicine Control Agency - Ministry of Health Slovenia: Agency for Medicinal Products - Ministry of Health United States: Food and Drug Administration |
Additional relevant MeSH terms:
|
Asthma Bronchial Diseases Respiratory Tract Diseases Lung Diseases, Obstructive Lung Diseases Respiratory Hypersensitivity Hypersensitivity, Immediate Hypersensitivity Immune System Diseases Bromides Tiotropium Anticonvulsants Central Nervous System Agents |
Therapeutic Uses Pharmacologic Actions Parasympatholytics Autonomic Agents Peripheral Nervous System Agents Physiological Effects of Drugs Cholinergic Antagonists Cholinergic Agents Neurotransmitter Agents Molecular Mechanisms of Pharmacological Action Bronchodilator Agents Anti-Asthmatic Agents Respiratory System Agents |
ClinicalTrials.gov processed this record on May 23, 2013