Suture Fixation System Versus Tendonous Reconstruction in Carpometacarpal (CMC) Arthroplasty
- Full Text View
- Tabular View
- No Study Results Posted
- Disclaimer
- How to Read a Study Record
Purpose
Thumb carpometacarpal (CMC) arthritis affect 1 in 4 females and 1 in 12 males. Patients who fail to respond to conservative treatment may benefit from surgery; however, controversy exists over the most effective surgical technique. A popular technique, ligament reconstruction with tendon interposition (LRTI) involves a trapeziectomy, followed by reconstruction of the palmar oblique ligament using a harvested flexor tendon from the wrist.
We believe that use of a suture fixation system to reconstruct the palmar oblique ligament, instead of harvesting a wrist tendon, may provide a superior repair. The objective of this study is to compare functional outcome measurements among patients who receive CMC arthroplasty using a suture fixation system (investigational group) to those who receive LRTI surgery (control group). We hypothesize that patients in the investigational group will demonstrate superior functionality, compared to patients in the control group.
| Condition | Intervention |
|---|---|
|
Thumb Carpometacarpal Arthritis |
Procedure: Ligament reconstruction with suture fixation system Procedure: Ligament Reconstruction with Tendon Interposition (LRTI) |
| Study Type: | Interventional |
| Study Design: | Allocation: Randomized Endpoint Classification: Efficacy Study Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment Masking: Double Blind (Subject, Outcomes Assessor) Primary Purpose: Treatment |
| Official Title: | Suture Fixation System Versus Tendonous Reconstruction in Thumb Carpometacarpal Arthroplasty: a Randomized Controlled Trial |
- Overall functionality [ Time Frame: Baseline ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]Functionality will be assessed using the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) questionnaire, which assesses functionality of the upper extremity, and Short Form 36 (SF-36) health outcomes assessment, which quantifies global functionality (not specific to the upper extremity).
- Overall Functionality [ Time Frame: 6 wks ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- Overall Functionality [ Time Frame: 3 mos ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- Overall Functionality [ Time Frame: 6 mos ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- Overall Functionality [ Time Frame: 12 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- Overall Functionality [ Time Frame: 24 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- Analog pain scale [ Time Frame: Baseline, 2 wks, 6 wks, 3 mos, 6 mos, 12 mos, 24 mos ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]Pain will be assessed using the visual analog pain scale, which asks the patient to rate their pain on a scale from 1 to 10.
- Strength measures [ Time Frame: Baseline, 6 wks, 3 mos, 6 mos, 12 mos, 24 mos ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]Strength will be assessed via key and tip pinch strength and grip strength, using a dynamometer
- Range of motion [ Time Frame: Baseline, 6 wks, 3 mos, 6 mos, 12 mos, 24 mos ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]Range of motion (ROM) will be assessed via radial and palmar abduction (degrees) and opposition (cm).
- Operative time [ Time Frame: Baseline, 6 wks, 3 mos, 6 mos, 12 mos, 24 mos ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]Operative time in minutes
- Scaphometacarpal distance [ Time Frame: Baseline, 6 wks, 3 mos, 6 mos, 12 mos, 24 mos ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]Distance between the distal pole of the scaphoid and the proximal aticular surface of the metacarpal. Taken in stressed and relaxed views
| Estimated Enrollment: | 60 |
| Study Start Date: | April 2010 |
| Estimated Study Completion Date: | December 2014 |
| Estimated Primary Completion Date: | December 2014 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure) |
| Arms | Assigned Interventions |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: LRTI
These patients will undergo ligament reconstruction with tendon interposition (LRTI) surgery. They will serve as a control group, against which to compare the investigational surgical technique.
|
Procedure: Ligament Reconstruction with Tendon Interposition (LRTI)
commonly performed CMC arthroplasty technique, consisting of a trapeziectomy, followed by palmar oblique ligament reconstruction using a harvested flexor tendon from the wrist.
|
|
Experimental: Suture fixation system
CMC arthroplasty which reconstructs palmar oblique ligament using a suture fixation system.
|
Procedure: Ligament reconstruction with suture fixation system
CMC arthroplasty consisting of reconstruction of the palmar oblique ligament using a suture fixation system
Other Name: Arthrex Mini TightRope
|
Eligibility| Ages Eligible for Study: | 18 Years and older |
| Genders Eligible for Study: | Both |
| Accepts Healthy Volunteers: | No |
Inclusion Criteria:
- Male or female patients aged >18.
- Eaton Stage III or IV CMC arthritis
- Failure to respond to conservative treatment
Exclusion Criteria:
- Previous surgical interventions on that thumb
- Upper extremity neurological dysfunction
- Inability to effectively communicate with the research staff, due to hearing impairment, cognitive impairment, or a language barrier
- Unwilling or unable to provide written informed consent
Contacts and Locations| Contact: Michael Shuler, MD | 706-433-4031 | jandmshuler@gmail.com |
| United States, Georgia | |
| Athens Orthopedic Clinic | Recruiting |
| Athens, Georgia, United States, 30606 | |
| Principal Investigator: Michael Shuler, MD | |
| Principal Investigator: | Michael Shuler, MD | Athens Orthopedic Clinic, PA |
More Information
No publications provided
| Responsible Party: | Michael Shuler, Hand and Upper Extremity Specialist, J&M Shuler |
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT01121874 History of Changes |
| Other Study ID Numbers: | CMC-101 |
| Study First Received: | April 9, 2010 |
| Last Updated: | January 28, 2013 |
| Health Authority: | United States: Institutional Review Board |
Keywords provided by J&M Shuler:
|
CMC arthritis thumb carpometacarpal arthritis basal joint arthritis thumb CMC arthritis |
Additional relevant MeSH terms:
|
Arthritis Joint Diseases Musculoskeletal Diseases |
ClinicalTrials.gov processed this record on May 19, 2013