Comparison of Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate With Atomoxetine HCl in Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) Subjects With an Inadequate Response to Methylphenidate
This study has been completed.
Sponsor:
Shire Development LLC
Information provided by (Responsible Party):
Shire Development LLC
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT01106430
First received: April 14, 2010
Last updated: January 25, 2013
Last verified: January 2013
- Full Text View
- Tabular View
- No Study Results Posted
- Disclaimer
- How to Read a Study Record
Purpose
This study will evaluate how long it takes for ADHD symptoms to improve in subjects who are judged by the Investigator to have had an inadequate response to methylphenidate therapy. The study will also test the safety of Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate and how well it works.
| Condition | Intervention | Phase |
|---|---|---|
|
Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder |
Drug: Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate Drug: Atomoxetine Hydrochloride |
Phase 3 |
| Study Type: | Interventional |
| Study Design: | Allocation: Randomized Endpoint Classification: Safety/Efficacy Study Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment Masking: Double Blind (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor) Primary Purpose: Treatment |
| Official Title: | A Phase 3b, Double-blind, Randomised, Active-controlled, Parallel Group Study to Assess the Time to Response of Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate to Atomoxetine Hydrochloride in Children and Adolescents Aged 6-17 Years With Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) Who Have Had an Inadequate Response to Methylphenidate Therapy |
Resource links provided by NLM:
MedlinePlus related topics:
Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
Drug Information available for:
Methylphenidate
Methylphenidate hydrochloride
Atomoxetine hydrochloride
Atomoxetine
Lisdexamfetamine
Lisdexamfetamine dimesylate
U.S. FDA Resources
Further study details as provided by Shire Development LLC:
Primary Outcome Measures:
- Clinical Global Impression-Improvement (CGI-I) Score [ Time Frame: 9 weeks ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]Clinical Global Impression-Improvement (CGI-I) consists of a 7-point scale ranging from 1 (very much improved) to 7 (very much worse). Improvement is defined as a score of 1 (very much improved) or 2 (much improved) on the scale.
Secondary Outcome Measures:
- ADHD-Rating Scale-IV [ Time Frame: 9 weeks ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]The ADHD-RS-IV consists of 18 items scored on a 4-point scale ranging from 0 (no symptoms) to 3 (severe symptoms) with total score ranging from 0 to 54.
- Clinical Global Impression-Severity (CGI-S) Score [ Time Frame: 9 weeks ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]CGI-S assesses the severity of the subject's condition on a 7-point scale ranging from 1 (normal, not at all ill) to 7 (among the most extremely ill)
- Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) [ Time Frame: 9 weeks ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]The C-SSRS is a semi-structured interview that captures the occurrence, severity, and frequency of suicide-related thoughts and behaviours during the assessment period. The interview includes definitions and suggested questions to solicit the type of information needed to determine if a suicide-related thought or behaviour occurred.
- The Udvalg for Kliniske Undersøgelser Side Effect Rating Scale (UKU-SERS-Clin) [ Time Frame: 9 weeks ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]The UKU-SERS-Clin is a comprehensive clinician-rated side effect scale with well-defined items to assess the side effects of psychopharmacological medications. It includes a global assessment of the influence of the reported side effects on daily performance, and an assessment of the probability of the causal relationship (or lack of it) of each item to the medication, which makes it useful for determining subsequent course of action.
- Health Utilities Index - Mark 2 (HUI-2) [ Time Frame: 9 weeks ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]The HUI-2 is a standardised measurement of health status and generic health-related quality of life to describe: 1) the experience of patients undergoing therapy, 2) long-term outcomes associated with disease or therapy; 3) the efficacy, effectiveness, and efficiency of healthcare interventions; and 4) the health status of general populations.
- Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale for Children (BPRS-C) [ Time Frame: 9 weeks ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]The BPRS-C provides a concise characterisation of the broad range of child and adolescent psychopathology. The 21-item BPRS-C is completed based on the clinician's interview with the child and parent/LAR.
| Enrollment: | 267 |
| Study Start Date: | June 2010 |
| Study Completion Date: | September 2012 |
| Primary Completion Date: | July 2012 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure) |
| Arms | Assigned Interventions |
|---|---|
| Experimental: Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate |
Drug: Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate
Oral 30, 50, or 70mg once-daily for 9 weeks
Other Name: Vyvanse
|
| Active Comparator: Atomoxetine Hydrochloride |
Drug: Atomoxetine Hydrochloride
Oral 10mg to 100mg once-daily for 9 weeks
Other Name: Strattera
|
Eligibility| Ages Eligible for Study: | 6 Years to 17 Years |
| Genders Eligible for Study: | Both |
| Accepts Healthy Volunteers: | No |
Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- Subject has had an historical or current inadequate response to MPH treatment. Inadequate response includes but is not limited to the presence of some residual symptoms, with associated impairment inadequate duration of action and/or variability of symptom control, and/or Investigator feels that the subject may derive benefit from an alternative drug treatment to MPH therapy.
- Subject is a male or female aged 6-17 years inclusive at the time of consent
- Subject must meet Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, fourth edition. - Text Revision (DSM IV TR) criteria for a primary diagnosis of ADHD based on a detailed psychiatric evaluation
- Subject must have a baseline ADHD-RS-IV total score 28.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Subject has taken more than 1 MPH treatment (for example, 2 or more different MPH treatments). Examples include but are not limited to RITALIN immediate release (IR) and EQUASYM IR; MEDIKINET IR and CONCERTA; RITALIN long-acting LA and CONCERTA. Note: this does not include subjects who have taken IR MPH for dose titration on a short-term basis (for example, £4 weeks) with an adequate response
- In the Investigator's judgement, subject has failed to respond to more than 1 previous course(s) of MPH treatment. Failure to respond includes worsening of symptoms or no change/minimal improvement of symptoms.
- Subject has previously been exposed to STRATTERA or to amphetamine therapy
- Subject has previously demonstrated intolerable side effects to 1 MPH treatment which limited titration to acceptable efficacy or that required a decrease in dose resulting in unacceptable tolerability and/or efficacy
- Subject has a current, controlled (requiring a restricted medication) or uncontrolled, comorbid psychiatric diagnosis with significant symptoms such as any severe comorbid Axis II disorder or severe Axis I disorder or other symptomatic manifestations, such as agitated states, marked anxiety, or tension that, in the opinion of the examining physician, will contraindicate treatment with SPD489 or STRATTERA or confound efficacy or safety assessments.
- Subject has a conduct disorder. Oppositional Defiant Disorder is not exclusionary.
Contacts and Locations
Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01106430
Show 64 Study Locations
Show 64 Study LocationsSponsors and Collaborators
Shire Development LLC
Investigators
| Principal Investigator: | Ralf W Dittmann, MD, PhD | Dept of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Central Inst of Mental Health |
More Information
No publications provided
| Responsible Party: | Shire Development LLC |
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT01106430 History of Changes |
| Other Study ID Numbers: | SPD489-317 |
| Study First Received: | April 14, 2010 |
| Last Updated: | January 25, 2013 |
| Health Authority: | United States: Food and Drug Administration Canada: Health Canada Canada: Ethics Review Committee Belgium: Federal Agency for Medicinal Products and Health Products France: Afssaps - Agence française de sécurité sanitaire des produits de santé (Saint-Denis) Germany: Ministry of Health Italy: National Monitoring Centre for Clinical Trials - Ministry of Health The Netherlands: The Central Committee on Research Involving Human Subjects (CCMO) Spain: Spanish Agency of Medicines Sweden: Medical Products Agency United Kingdom: Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency |
Keywords provided by Shire Development LLC:
|
ADHD |
Additional relevant MeSH terms:
|
Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity Hyperkinesis Attention Deficit and Disruptive Behavior Disorders Mental Disorders Diagnosed in Childhood Mental Disorders Dyskinesias Neurologic Manifestations Nervous System Diseases Signs and Symptoms Methylphenidate Dextroamphetamine Atomoxetine |
Dopamine Uptake Inhibitors Dopamine Agents Neurotransmitter Agents Molecular Mechanisms of Pharmacological Action Pharmacologic Actions Neurotransmitter Uptake Inhibitors Physiological Effects of Drugs Central Nervous System Stimulants Central Nervous System Agents Therapeutic Uses Adrenergic Uptake Inhibitors Adrenergic Agents |
ClinicalTrials.gov processed this record on May 21, 2013