Risk of Hospitalization for Severe Hypersensitivity (Including Severe Skin Reactions) in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Exposed to Oral Antidiabetic Treatments
- Full Text View
- Tabular View
- No Study Results Posted
- Disclaimer
- How to Read a Study Record
Purpose
The purpose of this study is to compare the incidence hospitalization for severe hypersensitivity and cutaneous reactions among patients with type 2 diabetes who are new users of saxagliptin and those who are new users of other oral antidiabetic drugs.
| Condition |
|---|
|
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 |
| Study Type: | Observational |
| Study Design: | Observational Model: Cohort |
| Official Title: | Comparison of Risk of Hospitalization for Severe Hypersensitivity (Including Severe Cutaneous Reactions) Between Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Initiating Saxagliptin and Those Initiating Other Oral Antidiabetic Treatments |
- Hospitalizations with any hypersensitivity reaction, including anaphylaxis, angioedema, generalized urticaria, SJS, TEN, and other severe skin reactions (i.e., acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis and drug rash with eosinophilia/systemic symptoms) [ Time Frame: 12-months ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
- Hospitalizations with any hypersensitivity reaction, including anaphylaxis, angioedema, generalized urticaria, SJS, TEN, and other severe skin reactions (i.e., acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis and drug rash with eosinophilia/systemic symptoms) [ Time Frame: 18-months ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
- Hospitalizations with any hypersensitivity reaction, including anaphylaxis, angioedema, generalized urticaria, SJS, TEN, and other severe skin reactions (i.e., acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis and drug rash with eosinophilia/systemic symptoms) [ Time Frame: 36-months ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
- Hospitalizations with any hypersensitivity reaction, including anaphylaxis, angioedema, generalized urticaria, SJS, TEN, and other severe skin reactions (i.e., acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis and drug rash with eosinophilia/systemic symptoms) [ Time Frame: 54-months ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
- Hospitalized for anaphylaxis [ Time Frame: 12-months ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
- Hospitalized for anaphylaxis [ Time Frame: 18-months ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
- Hospitalized for anaphylaxis [ Time Frame: 36-months ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
- Hospitalized for anaphylaxis [ Time Frame: 54-months ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
- Hospitalized for angioedema [ Time Frame: 12-months ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
- Hospitalized for angioedema [ Time Frame: 18-months ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
- Hospitalized for angioedema [ Time Frame: 36-months ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
- Hospitalized for angioedema [ Time Frame: 54-months ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
- Hospitalized for generalized urticaria [ Time Frame: 12-months ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
- Hospitalized for generalized urticaria [ Time Frame: 18-months ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
- Hospitalized for generalized urticaria [ Time Frame: 36-months ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
- Hospitalized for generalized urticaria [ Time Frame: 54-months ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
- Hospitalized for severe skin reactions [ Time Frame: 12-months ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
- Hospitalized for severe skin reactions [ Time Frame: 18-months ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
- Hospitalized for severe skin reactions [ Time Frame: 36-months ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
- Hospitalized for severe skin reactions [ Time Frame: 54-months ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
- Hospitalized for all endpoints [ Time Frame: 12-months ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
- Hospitalized for all endpoints [ Time Frame: 18-months ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
- Hospitalized for all endpoints [ Time Frame: 36-months ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
- Hospitalized for all endpoints [ Time Frame: 54-months ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
- Hospitalized/emergency room (ER) visits for hypersensitivity reactions [ Time Frame: 12-months ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
- Hospitalized/emergency room (ER) visits for hypersensitivity reactions [ Time Frame: 18-months ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
- Hospitalized/emergency room (ER) visits for hypersensitivity reactions [ Time Frame: 36-months ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
- Hospitalized/emergency room (ER) visits for hypersensitivity reactions [ Time Frame: 54-months ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
- Death from hypersensitivity reactions [ Time Frame: 12-months ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
- Death from hypersensitivity reactions [ Time Frame: 18-months ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
- Death from hypersensitivity reactions [ Time Frame: 36-months ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
- Death from hypersensitivity reactions [ Time Frame: 54-months ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
- Hospitalized for Stevens-Johnson syndrome (SJS) [ Time Frame: 12-months ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
- Hospitalized for Stevens-Johnson syndrome (SJS) [ Time Frame: 18-months ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
- Hospitalized for Stevens-Johnson syndrome (SJS) [ Time Frame: 36-months ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
- Hospitalized for Stevens-Johnson syndrome (SJS) [ Time Frame: 54-months ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
- Hospitalized for for toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN) [ Time Frame: 12-months ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
- Hospitalized for for toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN) [ Time Frame: 18-months ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
- Hospitalized for for toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN) [ Time Frame: 36-months ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
- Hospitalized for for toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN) [ Time Frame: 54-months ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
| Estimated Enrollment: | 113505 |
| Study Start Date: | January 2010 |
| Estimated Study Completion Date: | April 2015 |
| Estimated Primary Completion Date: | April 2015 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure) |
| Groups/Cohorts |
|---|
| Patients exposed to saxagliptin |
| Patients exposed to oral antidiabetic drugs (not saxagliptin) |
Detailed Description:
Prospectively designed retrospective database study. This study will be conducted using administrative claims data and electronic medical records that are collected as part of routine clinical practice
Eligibility| Ages Eligible for Study: | 18 Years and older |
| Genders Eligible for Study: | Both |
| Accepts Healthy Volunteers: | No |
| Sampling Method: | Non-Probability Sample |
This study will be carried out using databases containing administrative claims data (HealthCore Integrated Research DatabaseSM (HIRD) and Medicare in the U.S.) and electronic medical records (General Practice Research Database (GPRD) and The Health Improvement Network (THIN) in the UK). The US population includes patients from health plans in the northeast, southeastern, mid-Atlantic, central, mid-western, and western regions (HIRD) as well as US citizens 65 years of age and older (Medicare). The UK population includes patients seeking medical care from general practitioners (GPRD and THIN)
Inclusion Criteria:
- 18 years of age or older
- Newly prescribed saxagliptin or an Oral Anti-diabetic Drug (OAD) in a class other than Dipeptidyl peptidase IV (DPP4) inhibitors
- Enrolled in the respective database for at least 180 days prior to first prescription of new OAD
- Have at least one diagnostic code for a type 2 diabetes-related condition
Exclusion Criteria:
- Patients with an inpatient diagnostic code for any of the conditions of interest within the 180-day baseline period
- Patients prescribed a DPP4 inhibitor during the baseline period
Contacts and Locations
More Information
Additional Information:
No publications provided
| Responsible Party: | Bristol-Myers Squibb |
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT01086319 History of Changes |
| Other Study ID Numbers: | CV181-103 |
| Study First Received: | March 11, 2010 |
| Last Updated: | December 29, 2011 |
| Health Authority: | United States: Institutional Review Board United Kingdom: Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency |
Additional relevant MeSH terms:
|
Diabetes Mellitus Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 Hypersensitivity Glucose Metabolism Disorders Metabolic Diseases Endocrine System Diseases Immune System Diseases Saxagliptin |
Hypoglycemic Agents Physiological Effects of Drugs Pharmacologic Actions Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors Protease Inhibitors Enzyme Inhibitors Molecular Mechanisms of Pharmacological Action |
ClinicalTrials.gov processed this record on May 19, 2013