|
Home
Search
Study Topics
Glossary
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Sponsor: | University Hospital, Saarland |
|---|---|
| Information provided by (Responsible Party): | University Hospital, Saarland |
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT01083030 |
Purpose
The aim of the study is correlating efficacy of the treatment to the proportion of paclitaxel-dose supplied by the catheter. Forty-five patients each will be treated by paclitaxel-coated or uncoated conventional balloon catheters in randomized order in 3 study centers. Main inclusion criteria are Rutherford class 2 - 5, ≥70% stenosis or occlusion in the superficial femoral or popliteal artery, main exclusion criteria are related to the use of paclitaxel and the need for follow-up examinations. Either clinical or angiographic follow-up examinations are planned 6, 12 and 24 months following the intervention. Primary endpoint is 6-month angiographic late lumen loss. Secondary endpoints are further angiographic and clinical efficacy and various safety criteria.
| Condition | Intervention | Phase |
|---|---|---|
|
Peripheral Artery Disease |
Procedure: Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) |
Phase IV |
| Study Type: | Interventional |
| Study Design: | Allocation: Randomized Endpoint Classification: Efficacy Study Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment Masking: Single Blind (Outcomes Assessor) Primary Purpose: Treatment |
| Official Title: | Paclitaxel-coated Balloons in Femoral Indication to Defeat Restenosis |
Various angiographic and clinical efficacy measures, safety and tolerance of paclitaxel coated PTA balloons in inhibiting restenosis of femoropopliteal arteries:
| Estimated Enrollment: | 90 |
| Study Start Date: | March 2010 |
| Estimated Study Completion Date: | December 2012 |
| Primary Completion Date: | August 2011 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure) |
| Arms | Assigned Interventions |
|---|---|
|
Placebo Comparator: Conventional PTA
Angioplasty of SFA with uncoated balloon catheters
|
Procedure: Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA)
Angioplasty of superficial femoral artery (SFA)
Other Names:
|
|
Active Comparator: Drug coated balloon
Angioplasty of SFA with paclitaxel-coated balloon catheters
|
Procedure: Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA)
Angioplasty of superficial femoral artery (SFA)
Other Names:
|
Paclitaxel-coated balloons have been shown to reduce late lumen loss, restenosis rates and the need for repeat target lesion revascularization compared to conventional uncoated balloon catheters. The aim of the study is correlating efficacy of the treatment to the proportion of paclitaxel-dose supplied by the catheter. To this end paclitaxel loss of catheters in the introductory sheaths and residual paclitaxel on used balloons will be determined and correlated to individual data indicating inhibition of neointimal proliferation. According to the study protocol 45 patients each will be treated by paclitaxel-coated or uncoated conventional balloon catheters in randomized order in 3 study centers. Main inclusion criteria are Rutherford class 2 - 5, ≥70% stenosis or occlusion in the superficial femoral or popliteal artery, 3 to 30 cm of length; beyond common contraindications against PTA main exclusion criteria are related to the use of paclitaxel and the need for follow-up examinations. Patients will be blinded against treatment. Blinding of investigators after assignment of a patient to a treatment is not possible due to differences in the appearance of coated and uncoated catheters. Either clinical or angiographic follow-up examinations are planned 6, 12 and 24 months following the intervention. Primary endpoint is 6-month angiographic late lumen loss evaluated by a blinded independent core lab. Secondary endpoints are interventional success rate, restenosis rates, minimal lumen diameter, target lesion revascularization, change in Rutherford class, change in ankle-brachial-index, major amputations, a composite safety endpoint (defined as MAE =death of any cause, target limb amputation, clinically / DUS driven TLR) and all kinds of serious adverse events possibly related to the treatment.
Eligibility| Genders Eligible for Study: | Both |
| Accepts Healthy Volunteers: | No |
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Contacts and Locations| Germany | |
| Martin-Luther-Hospital Berlin | |
| Berlin, Germany, 14193 | |
| Ev. Hubertus Hospital Berlin | |
| Berlin, Germany, 14129 | |
| Vivantes - Klinikum Neukölln | |
| Berlin, Germany, 12351 | |
| Principal Investigator: | Michael Werk, MD | Martin-Luther-Hospital Berlin |
More Information
| Responsible Party: | University Hospital, Saarland |
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT01083030 History of Changes |
| Other Study ID Numbers: | Pac 12 |
| Study First Received: | March 4, 2010 |
| Last Updated: | November 29, 2011 |
| Health Authority: | Germany: Ethics Commission |
|
pAVK PTA drug coated balloon |
|
Peripheral Arterial Disease Atherosclerosis Arteriosclerosis Arterial Occlusive Diseases Vascular Diseases Cardiovascular Diseases Peripheral Vascular Diseases Paclitaxel |
Tubulin Modulators Antimitotic Agents Mitosis Modulators Molecular Mechanisms of Pharmacological Action Pharmacologic Actions Antineoplastic Agents, Phytogenic Antineoplastic Agents Therapeutic Uses |