Study to Document Treatment Patterns and to Evaluate Leuprolide and Alternative Therapeutic Approaches to the Treatments of Advanced Prostate Cancer
This study has been completed.
Sponsor:
Abbott
Information provided by (Responsible Party):
Abbott
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT01081873
First received: February 27, 2010
Last updated: October 26, 2012
Last verified: October 2012
- Full Text View
- Tabular View
- Study Results
- Disclaimer
- How to Read a Study Record
Purpose
Document treatment patterns and evaluate LUCRIN / LUCRIN-TRIDEPOT® (Leuprolide) and alternative therapeutic approaches to the treatment of advanced prostate cancer during normal clinical practice and in accordance with the terms of the Belgian marketing authorization and reimbursement conditions.
| Condition | Intervention |
|---|---|
|
Prostatic Neoplasm |
Drug: leuprolide (Lucrin/Lucrin-Tri-depot) |
| Study Type: | Observational |
| Study Design: | Observational Model: Case-Only Time Perspective: Prospective |
| Official Title: | A Post-Marketing Observational Study to Document Treatment Patterns and to Evaluate Leuprolide and Alternative Therapeutic Approaches to the Treatment of Advanced Prostate Cancer |
Resource links provided by NLM:
Further study details as provided by Abbott:
Primary Outcome Measures:
- Effectiveness Parameter for Staging of Prostate Cancer: Metastases at Each Visit [ Time Frame: time 0 (Baseline), month 3, and every 3 months until disease progression or up to 24 months, whichever came first ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]The number of participants with metastases that are absent, local tumor, single metastases, multiple metastases in 1 organ, and multiple metastases in multiple organs at each visit is summarized.
- Effectiveness Parameter for Screening or Recurrence of Prostate Cancer: Mean Prostate-specific Antigen (PSA) at Each Visit [ Time Frame: time 0 (Baseline), month 3, and every 3 months until disease progression or up to 24 months, whichever came first ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]The mean PSA in ng/mL to screen and assess for the recurrence of prostate cancer at each visit is presented.
- Effectiveness Parameter: the Number of Participants With a Complete or Partial Response, Stable Disease, or Progressive Disease Following Treatment at Each Visit [ Time Frame: month 3, and every 3 months until disease progression or up to 24 months, whichever came first ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]Response to treatment is summarized by the number of participants at each visit with a complete or partial response, stable disease, or progressive disease. Disease status determination was not predefined, but was based on the judgement of each Investigator.
- Effectiveness Parameter for Prognosis: the Number of Participants With a Survival Prognosis of > 10 Years, 5 - 10 Years, 1 - 5 Years, 6 - 12 Months, and < 6 Months [ Time Frame: time 0 (Baseline), month 3, and every 3 months thereafter until disease progression or up to 24 months, whichever came first ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]The prognosis for participants is summarized for each visit by the number of participants at each visit with a survival prognosis of 10 years, 5 - 10 years, 1 - 5 years, 6 - 12 months, and < 6 months. Methods for determining survival prognosis were not prespecified, but were based on the judgement of each Investigator.
- Treatment Patterns for Prostate Cancer Treatments: Number of Participants at Each Visit Who Took Lucrin/Lucrin Tridepot, Luteinizing Hormone-releasing Hormone (LHRH) Agonists, Anti-androgens, or Other Drug Treatments, or Who Had Surgery or Radiotherapy. [ Time Frame: time 0 (Baseline), month 3, and every 3 months until disease progression or up to 24 months, whichever came first ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]Prostate cancer treatment for all participants is summarized by the number of participants at each visit who took any Lucrin/Lucrin Tridepot, LHRH agonist, anti-androgens, or other drug treatments, or who had any type of surgery or radiotherapy (external radiation or brachytherapy).
Secondary Outcome Measures:
- Safety Parameter: Number of Participants Reporting Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) [ Time Frame: Baseline to disease progression or 24 months, whichever came first ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]The number of participants experiencing a serious adverse event during the course of the study is summarized. See the Reported Adverse Event section for details.
- Epidemiological Data: Mean Weight [ Time Frame: at time 0 (Baseline) ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]The mean weight of all participants at baseline is provided.
- Epidemiological Data: Mean Age [ Time Frame: at time 0 (Baseline) ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]The mean age of all participants at baseline is provided.
- Epidemiological Data: Race [ Time Frame: at time 0 (Baseline) ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]The number of participants by race at baseline is presented.
- Epidemiological Data: Tumor Staging - Among Participants With a Positive Biopsy, the Number of Participants With Adenocarcinoma Tissue or Other Tissues Recorded for the Positive Biopsy. [ Time Frame: at time 0 (Baseline) ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]Among those participants with a positive biopsy at baseline, the number of participants with adenocarcinoma tissue or other tissue type is summarized.
- Epidemiological Data: PSA at Baseline [ Time Frame: at time 0 (Baseline) ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]The median, minimum, and maximum PSA values in ng/mL at baseline are provided. The mean PSA at baseline is reported in the Primary Outcome Measure section above.
- Epidemiological Data: Tumor Staging (Positive or Negative) Via a Rectal Examination, Prostate Biopsy, Echograph, or Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Test. [ Time Frame: at time 0 (Baseline) ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]The number of participants at baseline who were positive or negative for tumors via a rectal examination, prostate biopsy, echograph of the hyperechogenic zones, or MRI are provided.
- Epidemiological Data: the Number of Participants With Tumor Stages T0, T1, T2, T3, and T4. [ Time Frame: at time 0 (Baseline) ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]The number of participants with tumor stages T0, T1, T2, T3, and T4 as reported by the physician or pathologist is summarized. T0: no evidence of primary tumor. T1: histologic tumor confined to prostate; clinically unapparent tumor, undetectable by digital rectal examination or by ultrasound. T2: tumor is confined to prostrate and can be detected by digital rectal examination. T3: tumor extends through the prostate capsule but has not spread to other organs. T4: tumor has invaded adjacent structures/organs other than seminal vesicles.
- Epidemiological Data: Node Staging - the Number of Participants With a Positive or Negative Computerized Tomography (CT) Scan or Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Test [ Time Frame: at time 0 (Baseline) ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]In this case, a CT or MRI is considered positive when lymph nodes are detectable. A CT or MRI is considered negative when lymph nodes are not detectable.
- Epidemiological Data: Node Staging - the Number of Participants With a N0 or N1 Stage at Baseline. [ Time Frame: at time 0 (Baseline) ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]N0: tumor cells absent from regional lymph nodes. N1: regional lymph node metastasis present.
- Epidemiological Data: Bone Scan at Baseline [ Time Frame: at time 0 (Baseline) ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]The number of participants at baseline with a positive or negative bone scan was summarized. Determination of bone scan status was based on the interpretation of the Investigator or radiologist.
- Epidemiological Data: Metastasis Staging (M0 or M1) at Baseline [ Time Frame: at time 0 (Baseline) ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]The number of participants at baseline reported to be in metastasis stage M0 or M1 is summarized. M0: no distant metastasis. M1: metastasis to distant organs beyond regional lymph nodes.
| Enrollment: | 2717 |
| Study Start Date: | June 2004 |
| Study Completion Date: | December 2010 |
| Primary Completion Date: | December 2010 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure) |
| Groups/Cohorts | Assigned Interventions |
|---|---|
|
Advanced prostate cancer participants
Participants with advanced prostate cancer treated with Lucrin /Lucrin- Tri-depot (leuprolide) or any other treatment within local reimbursement guidelines.
|
Drug: leuprolide (Lucrin/Lucrin-Tri-depot)
Subcutaneous or intramuscular administration for all participants
Other Names:
|
Eligibility| Ages Eligible for Study: | 18 Years and older |
| Genders Eligible for Study: | Male |
| Accepts Healthy Volunteers: | No |
| Sampling Method: | Non-Probability Sample |
Study Population
Urologists
Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- Patients with advanced prostate cancer who have been prescribed Lucrin/ Lucrin-Tri-depot or any other treatment with local reimbursement guidelines; Patients willing to consent to data being collected and provided to Abbott Laboratories.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Contraindications according to the Summary of Product Characteristics (SPC).
Contacts and Locations
Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01081873
Show 135 Study Locations
Show 135 Study LocationsSponsors and Collaborators
Abbott
Investigators
| Study Director: | Simonne Lens | Abbott |
More Information
No publications provided
| Responsible Party: | Abbott |
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT01081873 History of Changes |
| Other Study ID Numbers: | PMOS-BELG-04-001 |
| Study First Received: | February 27, 2010 |
| Results First Received: | December 22, 2011 |
| Last Updated: | October 26, 2012 |
| Health Authority: | Belgium: Institutional Review Board |
Keywords provided by Abbott:
|
Multicenter study |
Additional relevant MeSH terms:
|
Neoplasms Prostatic Neoplasms Genital Neoplasms, Male Urogenital Neoplasms Neoplasms by Site Genital Diseases, Male Prostatic Diseases Leuprolide |
Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal Antineoplastic Agents Therapeutic Uses Pharmacologic Actions Fertility Agents, Female Fertility Agents Reproductive Control Agents Physiological Effects of Drugs |
ClinicalTrials.gov processed this record on May 19, 2013