Comparison of the Success Rate of Two Approaches for Obturator Nerve Block in TURB (Conventional Pubic Approach [Labat Technique] and Inguinal Approach)

This study has been completed.
Sponsor:
Information provided by:
Yonsei University
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT01080599
First received: March 2, 2010
Last updated: March 3, 2010
Last verified: March 2010
  Purpose

The purpose of this study is to compare the success rate of two approaches for obturator nerve block in TURB (conventional pubic approach [Labat technique] and inguinal approach.


Condition Intervention
Nerve Block
Procedure: obturator nerve block

Study Type: Interventional
Study Design: Allocation: Randomized
Endpoint Classification: Safety/Efficacy Study
Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment
Official Title: Comparison of the Success Rate of Two Approaches for Obturator Nerve Block in TURB (Conventional Pubic Approach [Labat Technique] and Inguinal Approach)

Further study details as provided by Yonsei University:

Primary Outcome Measures:
  • Assessment of obturator sign during using nerve stimulator and operation [ Designated as safety issue: No ]

Enrollment: 100
Study Start Date: June 2009
Study Completion Date: February 2010
Primary Completion Date: January 2010 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure)
Arms Assigned Interventions
Experimental: conventional pubic approach Procedure: obturator nerve block
Experimental: inguinal approach Procedure: obturator nerve block

  Eligibility

Ages Eligible for Study:   20 Years and older
Genders Eligible for Study:   Both
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:   No
Criteria

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Scheduled to undergoing transurethral resection of bladder tumor during combined spinal anesthesia and obturator nerve block were included in the clinical study

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with advanced cardiac and respiratory insufficiency
  • Allergy to local anesthetics
  • Preexisting neurologic deficits
  • Prior operation involving the hip and the inguinal region and bleeding tendency were excluded.
  Contacts and Locations
No Contacts or Locations Provided
  More Information

No publications provided

Responsible Party: Hae Keum Kil/Professor, Yonsei University, College of Medicine
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01080599     History of Changes
Other Study ID Numbers: 4-2009-0137
Study First Received: March 2, 2010
Last Updated: March 3, 2010
Health Authority: Korea: Food and Drug Administration
Korea: Ministry for Health, Welfare and Family Affairs

Keywords provided by Yonsei University:
obturator nerve block in TURB

ClinicalTrials.gov processed this record on April 17, 2014