Comparison of Nonposterior- and Posterior-Stabilized Mobile-Bearing Total Knee Arthroplasty
This study has been completed.
Sponsor:
Ewha Womans University
Information provided by:
Ewha Womans University
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT01075620
First received: February 16, 2010
Last updated: February 24, 2010
Last verified: January 2010
- Full Text View
- Tabular View
- No Study Results Posted
- Disclaimer
- How to Read a Study Record
Purpose
The purpose of this study is to determine if there are any clinical or radiographic differences in non-posterior stabilized rotating mobile bearing design versus a posterior stabilized rotating mobile bearing designs.
| Condition | Intervention | Phase |
|---|---|---|
|
Osteoarthritis |
Device: PFC-Sigma RP Device: LPS RP |
Phase 4 |
| Study Type: | Interventional |
| Study Design: | Allocation: Randomized Endpoint Classification: Safety/Efficacy Study Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment Masking: Double Blind (Subject, Outcomes Assessor) Primary Purpose: Treatment |
| Official Title: | Comparison of Nonposterior- and Posterior-Stabilized Mobile-Bearing Total Knee Arthroplasty A Prospective, Randomized Study |
Resource links provided by NLM:
Further study details as provided by Ewha Womans University:
Primary Outcome Measures:
- Knee Society knee score [ Time Frame: at 3 months, 1 year, than annually ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
Secondary Outcome Measures:
- Range of motion [ Time Frame: at 3 months, 1 year, than annually ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
| Enrollment: | 126 |
| Study Start Date: | May 2002 |
| Study Completion Date: | January 2010 |
| Primary Completion Date: | December 2002 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure) |
| Arms | Assigned Interventions |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: PFC sigma RP
Posterior stabilized rotating platform knee (press Fit Condylar Sigma rotating-platform, Depuy, Warsaw, Indiana)
|
Device: PFC-Sigma RP
Posterior stabilizing rotating platform total knee components
Other Name: PFC sigma RP
|
|
Active Comparator: LCS RP
non posterior stabilized Low Contact Stress Rotating-Platform; Depuy, Warsaw, Indiana
|
Device: LPS RP
non-posterior stabilized rotating platform design
Other Name: LCS RP
|
Detailed Description:
Out comes measures were to determine
- whether the knee and function scores and the radiographic results of the knees with a PFC Sigma RP knee prosthesis would be better than those with an LCS RP prosthesis.
- whether the patients with a PFC RP knee prosthesis would have a better range of knee motion than those with an LCS RP prosthesis.
- whether patient satisfaction and preference would be better in the patients having a PFC Sigma RP knee prosthesis than those of patients having an LCS RP knee prosthesis
- whether complication rate would be less in the knees with a PFC sigma RP knee prosthesis than in the knees with an LCS RP prosthesis.
Eligibility| Ages Eligible for Study: | 30 Years to 90 Years |
| Genders Eligible for Study: | Both |
| Accepts Healthy Volunteers: | No |
Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- End-stage osteoarthritis of the knee joint requiring total knee arthroplasty with bilateral disease
Exclusion Criteria:
- Inflammatory disease
- patient with other Lower extremity disease which may affect functional outcome
- Neurologic disease effecting patients lower extremity
- Revision surgery
- Patient not medically cleared for bilateral surgery
Contacts and Locations
More Information
No publications provided
| Responsible Party: | Young-Hoo, Kim M.D. Professor, Ewha Womans University Mokdong Hospital Joint Replacement Center |
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT01075620 History of Changes |
| Other Study ID Numbers: | 2010-2-16 |
| Study First Received: | February 16, 2010 |
| Last Updated: | February 24, 2010 |
| Health Authority: | Korea: Food and Drug Administration |
Keywords provided by Ewha Womans University:
|
rotating platform posterior stabilized non-posterior stabilized |
Additional relevant MeSH terms:
|
Osteoarthritis Arthritis Joint Diseases Musculoskeletal Diseases Rheumatic Diseases |
ClinicalTrials.gov processed this record on June 17, 2013