Study of Different Pain Scores in Single-Port Access (SPA) Laparoscopic Hysterectomy Versus Conventional Laparoscopic Hysterectomy
This study has been completed.
Sponsor:
Samsung Medical Center
Information provided by:
Samsung Medical Center
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT01064128
First received: February 5, 2010
Last updated: July 18, 2011
Last verified: July 2011
- Full Text View
- Tabular View
- No Study Results Posted
- Disclaimer
- How to Read a Study Record
Purpose
Purpose:
The attempt to further reduce the operative trauma in laparoscopic hysterectomy led in new technique such as Single-Port Access (SPA) laparoscopic surgery. This new technique is considered as painless procedure and better cosmetic effect but there are not any publications to study a possible different pain score and cosmetic effect in new techniques versus conventional laparoscopic hysterectomy. In this randomized controlled study the researchers have investigated the pain scores and cosmetic satisfaction by modified body image scale and cosmetic scar scale.
| Condition | Intervention | Phase |
|---|---|---|
|
Uterine Myoma Uterine Adenomyosis |
Procedure: conventional laparoscopic hysterectomy Procedure: SPA laparoscopic hysterectomy |
Phase 3 |
| Study Type: | Interventional |
| Study Design: | Allocation: Randomized Endpoint Classification: Safety/Efficacy Study Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment Masking: Open Label Primary Purpose: Treatment |
| Official Title: | Randomized Controlled Study of Different Pain Scores in Single-Port Access (SPA) Laparoscopic Hysterectomy Versus Conventional Laparoscopic Hysterectomy |
Resource links provided by NLM:
Further study details as provided by Samsung Medical Center:
Primary Outcome Measures:
- Pain score measured by visual analog scale [ Time Frame: postoperative 24 hours ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
Secondary Outcome Measures:
- Modified body image scale and cosmetic scar scale [ Time Frame: postoperative 6 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
| Estimated Enrollment: | 40 |
| Study Start Date: | January 2010 |
| Study Completion Date: | December 2010 |
| Primary Completion Date: | December 2010 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure) |
| Arms | Assigned Interventions |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: conventional laparoscopic hysterectomy
Three or four ports conventional laparoscopic hysterectomy
|
Procedure: conventional laparoscopic hysterectomy
conventional 3 or 4 ports laparoscopic hysterectomy
|
|
Active Comparator: SPA laparoscopic hysterectomy
Single umbilical incision laparoscopic hysterectomy
|
Procedure: SPA laparoscopic hysterectomy
single-port access laparoscopic hysterectomy
|
Eligibility| Ages Eligible for Study: | 30 Years to 60 Years |
| Genders Eligible for Study: | Female |
| Accepts Healthy Volunteers: | No |
Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- Age 30-60, female
- Symptomatic (Dysmenorrhea, Palpable mass, Pelvic pain or discomfort, Urinary symptom, Increasing size, Menorrhagia) myomas or adenomyosis
- Suspected uterine myoma and/or adenomyosis on transvaginal ultrasonography (USG)
- At least a 6-month thorough follow-up record available
- Informed consent
Exclusion Criteria:
- Endometrial hyperplasia without myoma or adenomyosis
- Body Mass Index more than 30
- Huge uterus defined by longitudinal uterine diameter larger than 10cm and anteroposterior diameter larger than 8cm in USG
Contacts and Locations
More Information
No publications provided
| Responsible Party: | Tae Joong, Kim/Clinical Assistant Professor, Samsung Medical Center |
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT01064128 History of Changes |
| Other Study ID Numbers: | 2009-09-093 |
| Study First Received: | February 5, 2010 |
| Last Updated: | July 18, 2011 |
| Health Authority: | South Korea: Institutional Review Board |
Keywords provided by Samsung Medical Center:
|
Single-port Laparoscopy Hysterectomy |
Pain Cosmesis Analgesics |
Additional relevant MeSH terms:
|
Myoma Leiomyoma Myofibroma Endometriosis Neoplasms, Muscle Tissue Neoplasms, Connective and Soft Tissue |
Neoplasms by Histologic Type Neoplasms Neoplasms, Connective Tissue Connective Tissue Diseases Genital Diseases, Female |
ClinicalTrials.gov processed this record on June 18, 2013