TACE With Irinotecan Drug-eluting Beads and Intravenous (IV) Cetuximab in Refractory Colorectal Cancer (DEBIRITUX)
- Full Text View
- Tabular View
- No Study Results Posted
- Disclaimer
- How to Read a Study Record
Purpose
The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of Irinotecan Beads in combination with intravenous cetuximab versus intravenous irinotecan in combination with intravenous cetuximab in the treatment of patients with unresectable liver metastases from colorectal cancer.
Secondary objectives are safety and tolerability of hepatic chemoembolization and the question if the addition of aprepitant to standard antiemetic prophylaxis in patients treated by hepatic chemoembolization is safe and will reduce the rate of acute and delayed nausea and emesis.
| Condition | Intervention | Phase |
|---|---|---|
|
Colorectal Cancer |
Drug: Cetuximab Drug: Irinotecan Device: Irinotecan eluting BEADS |
Phase 2 |
| Study Type: | Interventional |
| Study Design: | Allocation: Randomized Endpoint Classification: Efficacy Study Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment Masking: Open Label Primary Purpose: Treatment |
| Official Title: | A Randomized Phase II Trial of Irinotecan Drug-eluting Beads Administered by Hepatic Chemoembolization With Intravenous Cetuximab (DEBIRITUX) Versus Systemic Treatment With Intravenous Cetuximab and Irinotecan in Patients With Refractory Metastatic Colorectal Cancer and K-ras Wild-type Tumours |
- Progression free survival rate [ Time Frame: 6 months after first administration of study medication ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- Tumour Response (according to RECIST v1.1) [ Time Frame: every three months up to progression of disease, maximum 12 months from the date of patient enrolment ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]extent of treated lesions
- Time to progression [ Time Frame: every three months, until death of patient, maximum 12 months from the date of patient enrolment ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- Number of adverse events in study patients [ Time Frame: whole study, every two weeks until 28 days from the date of last administration of study medication ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
- Local tumour response [ Time Frame: every three months up to progression of disease, maximum 12 months from the date of patient enrolment ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]extent of necrosis in the treated lesions
- Overall survival [ Time Frame: every three months, until death of patient, maximum 12 months from the date of last patient enrolment ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
| Enrollment: | 8 |
| Study Start Date: | February 2010 |
| Estimated Study Completion Date: | September 2012 |
| Primary Completion Date: | December 2011 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure) |
| Arms | Assigned Interventions |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: hepatic TACE with irinotecan eluting beads and iv cetuximab
Irinotecan drug-eluting beads administered by hepatic chemoembolization with intravenous cetuximab (DEBIRITUX)
|
Drug: Cetuximab
Starting dose of 400mg/m2, followed by weekly 250mg/m2
Other Name: Erbitux
Device: Irinotecan eluting BEADS
A minimum of two treatments per lobe (four bi-weekly sessions in the event of bilobar disease) at week 0 and 4 with up to 4ml (100-300µm DC Bead loaded with up to 200mg irinotecan) will be scheduled (i.e. for bilobar disease right lobe: week 0, left lobe: week 2, right lobe: week 4 and left lobe: week 6: following toxicity and extending interval if toxicity seen).
Other Name: DC Bead
|
|
Active Comparator: iv cetuximab and irinotecan
systemic treatment with intravenous cetuximab and irinotecan
|
Drug: Cetuximab
Starting dose of 400mg/m2, followed by weekly 250mg/m2
Other Name: Erbitux
Drug: Irinotecan
Irinotecan 180 mg/m² to be administered every two weeks
|
Detailed Description:
About half of patients with newly diagnosed colorectal cancer will develop metastatic disease and, however, in spite of the significant progress in the therapeutical strategies for metastatic disease, virtually all patients will eventually succumb to their illness. Based on prior clinical data there is a good rationale for the expectation that the combination of systemic chemotherapy and arterial chemoembolization with drug eluting beads may be effective in the setting of patients with unresectable or chemorefractory liver metastases. The aim of this study is therefore to assess whether the combination of Irinotecan eluting beads and intravenous cetuximab is safe and effective in the treatment of patients with unresectable liver metastases from refractory colorectal cancer and will result in a prolongation of disease control when compared to standard systemic treatment with intravenous irinotecan and intravenous cetuximab. In this patient group, intravenous irinotecan plus intravenous cetuximab may represent the "standard of care", with a previously described activity. The patient group is defined in terms of pretreatment, and the scientific question is whether the way of irinotecan administration by eluting beads in feasible and somehow beneficial.
Eligibility| Ages Eligible for Study: | 18 Years and older |
| Genders Eligible for Study: | Both |
| Accepts Healthy Volunteers: | No |
Inclusion Criteria:
- Patients with confirmed diagnosis of stage IV (UICC) colorectal cancer with unresectable liver metastases (primary tumour may be present) and k-ras wild-type tumours
- Patients had been treated and shown to be refractory to 5-FU (Capecitabine allowed)/oxaliplatin and/or 5-FU/irinotecan. Prior therapy with VEGF-inhibitors (e.g bevacizumab) is allowed
- Patients with at least one measurable liver metastasis, with size > 1cm (RECIST criteria)
- Patients with liver only or liver dominant disease (defined as ≥ 50 % tumour burden confined to the liver)
- Patients with a portal vein not interfering with transarterial chemoembolization (e.g. no thrombosis) as judged by the investigator
- ECOG Performance status ≤ 2
- Life expectancy > 3 months
- Age ≥ 18 years.
- At least 4 weeks since last administration of last chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy (bone metastases may be allowed)
- Patients who received VEGF-inhibition (e.g. with bevacizumab) in prior therapy are eligible if stopped since 4-6 weeks before randomization
- Haematologic function: ANC ≥ 1.5 x 109/L, platelets ≥ 75 x109/L
- INR < 1.5 (patients on therapeutic anticoagulants are not eligible)
- Adequate liver function as measured by serum transaminases (AST & ALT) ≤ 3 x ULN and total bilirubin ≤ 1.5 x ULN
- Adequate renal function: Serum creatinine ≤ 1.5 x ULN
- Normal level of serum magnesium
- Women of child bearing potential and fertile men are required to use effective contraception (negative serum βHCG for women of child-bearing age
- Signed, written informed consent
Exclusion Criteria:
- Presence of CNS metastases
- Contraindications to irinotecan therapy (Chronic inflammatory bowel disease and/or bowel obstruction, history of severe hypersensitivity reactions to irinotecan hydrochloride trihydrate)
- Active bacterial, viral or fungal infection within 72 hours of study entry
- Women who are pregnant or breast feeding
- Allergy to contrast media
- Presence of another concurrent malignancy. Prior malignancy in the last 5 years except adequately treated basal or squamous cell skin cancer or carcinoma in situ of the cervix
Any contraindication for hepatic embolisation procedures:
- Large shunt as determined by the investigator (pretesting with lung perfusion scan not required)
- Severe atheromatosis
- Hepatofugal blood flow
- Other significant medical or surgical condition, or any medication or treatment, that would place the patient at undue risk, that would preclude the safe use of chemoembolization or would interfere with study participation
- Known hypersensitivity or contraindication to the drugs used in the trial (eg: cetuximab, 5-HT3 receptor antagonist, dexamethasone, or any component of aprepitant)
Contacts and Locations| Germany | |
| Zentralklinik Bad Berka GmbH, Abteilung für Interventionelle Radiologie | |
| Bad Berka, Germany, 99437 | |
| Universitätsklinikum Carl Gustav Carus an der Technischen Universität Dresden | |
| Dresden, Germany, 01307 | |
| Kliniken Essen-Mitte, Klinik für Innere Medizin IV | |
| Essen, Germany, 45136 | |
| Klinikum Esslingen, Klinik für Onkologie, Gastroenterologie und Allgemeine Innere Medizin | |
| Esslingen, Germany, 73730 | |
| Universitätsklinikum der Johann Wolfgang Goethe Universität Frankfurt | |
| Frankfurt/M., Germany, 60590 | |
| Krankenhaus Nordwest | |
| Frankfurt/M., Germany, 60488 | |
| Martin-Luther-Universität Halle-Wittenberg | |
| Halle (Saale), Germany, 06097 | |
| Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf | |
| Hamburg, Germany, 20246 | |
| SLK-Kliniken Heilbronn | |
| Heilbronn, Germany, 74078 | |
| Otto-von-Guericke-Universität Magdeburg | |
| Magdeburg, Germany, 39120 | |
| Universitätsklinikum Regensburg | |
| Regensburg, Germany, 93053 | |
| Universitätsklinikum Tübingen, Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik II | |
| Tübingen, Germany, 72076 | |
| Universitätsklinikum Würzburg, Institut für Röntgendiagnostik | |
| Würzburg, Germany, 97080 | |
| Principal Investigator: | Dirk Arnold, MD | Universitätsklinikum Eppendorf, Universitäres Cancer Center |
More Information
No publications provided
| Responsible Party: | Dirk Arnold, Prof. Dr. med., Martin-Luther-Universität Halle-Wittenberg |
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT01060423 History of Changes |
| Other Study ID Numbers: | EudraCT: 2009-014728-44 |
| Study First Received: | January 27, 2010 |
| Last Updated: | June 27, 2012 |
| Health Authority: | Germany: Federal Institute for Drugs and Medical Devices |
Keywords provided by Martin-Luther-Universität Halle-Wittenberg:
|
colorectal liver metastasis KRAS wildtype chemoembolization irinotecan eluting beads |
Additional relevant MeSH terms:
|
Colorectal Neoplasms Intestinal Neoplasms Gastrointestinal Neoplasms Digestive System Neoplasms Neoplasms by Site Neoplasms Digestive System Diseases Gastrointestinal Diseases Colonic Diseases Intestinal Diseases Rectal Diseases Irinotecan |
Cetuximab Antineoplastic Agents, Phytogenic Antineoplastic Agents Therapeutic Uses Pharmacologic Actions Radiation-Sensitizing Agents Physiological Effects of Drugs Topoisomerase I Inhibitors Topoisomerase Inhibitors Enzyme Inhibitors Molecular Mechanisms of Pharmacological Action |
ClinicalTrials.gov processed this record on May 22, 2013