Anesthesia Induction in Patients Undergoing Surgery for Cervical Myelopathy (Blade runner)
Recruitment status was Recruiting
- Full Text View
- Tabular View
- No Study Results Posted
- Disclaimer
- How to Read a Study Record
Purpose
Aim of this trial is to compare propofol-based anaesthesia vs. sevoflurane-based anaesthesia induction in patients with cervical myelopathy receiving oral or nasal fiberoptic intubation.
| Condition | Intervention | Phase |
|---|---|---|
|
Spinal Cord Diseases |
Drug: anaesthetics: sevofluorane |
Phase 4 |
| Study Type: | Interventional |
| Study Design: | Allocation: Randomized Endpoint Classification: Safety/Efficacy Study Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment Masking: Open Label Primary Purpose: Treatment |
| Official Title: | Anesthesia Induction With Propofol or Sevoflurane in Patients Undergoing Fiberoptic Intubation for Cervical Myelopathy: Effects on Heamodynamics |
- episode of severe arterial hypotension [ Time Frame: at 0 minut, after 3 minuts, after 5 minuts ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- the incidence and duration of apnoea and the incidence of induction complications such as laryngospasm, coughing and patient movement during fiberoptic intubation. [ Time Frame: at 0 minuts , at 5 minuts ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
| Estimated Enrollment: | 116 |
| Study Start Date: | April 2009 |
| Estimated Primary Completion Date: | March 2010 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure) |
| Arms | Assigned Interventions |
|---|---|
| Active Comparator: propofol |
Drug: anaesthetics: sevofluorane
0.5%of sevofluorane with air
|
| Active Comparator: sevofluorane |
Drug: anaesthetics: sevofluorane
0.5%of sevofluorane with air
|
Detailed Description:
Background: Fiberoptic intubation is the preferred method of intubation in patients with acute symptoms or signs of cervical myelopathy. This approach minimizes cervical spine movements to prevent new neurologic deficits or further neurologic injury, and is the safer method to secure the airways in patients with foreseen difficult intubation. In these patients anaesthesia induction is aimed to prevent cervical spine movements and to maintain hemodynamic stability. The most commonly reported technique for anaesthesia induction in patients with cervical myelopathy is based on local anaesthesia and propofol administration. Aim of this trial is to compare propofol-based anaesthesia vs. sevoflurane-based anaesthesia induction in patients with cervical myelopathy receiving oral or nasal fiberoptic intubation.
Methods: This randomized controlled trial is designed to prove equivalence. A series of 116 patients aged between 18 and 75 years, with cervical myelopathy will be enrolled. In all patients topical anaesthesia will be accomplished before anaesthesia induction. Patients will be randomly assigned to one of two anaesthesia induction strategies (sevoflurane + O2 + air or propofol + O2 + air). When loss of consciousness occurs (indicated by Bispectral index values between 40 and 50), oral or nasal fiberoptic intubation will be performed. The hemodynamic effects of the anaesthesia induction strategies will be assessed measuring mean arterial pressure at 4 time points: before anaesthesia induction (T1: baseline), at the end of anaesthesia induction when an adequate sedation level, with Bispectral index values 40-50, is achieved (T2: sedation steady state); immediately after placement of endotracheal tube (T3: intubation); five minute after tracheal intubation (T4: post-intubation). Secondary end-points of the study include the incidence of apnoea during induction process, diagnosed as absence of carbon dioxide trace for more than 10 seconds, the incidence of induction complications, defined as presence of laryngospasm, coughing and patient movement, and intubation conditions, defined as cord opening.
Discussion: We present the development phase of this anaesthesiological trial. A total of 40 patients have been enrolled from April 2009.
Eligibility| Ages Eligible for Study: | 18 Years to 75 Years |
| Genders Eligible for Study: | Both |
| Accepts Healthy Volunteers: | No |
Inclusion Criteria:
- Patient undergoing cervical spine surgery;
- Male or female;
- Aged 18-75 years.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Severe cardiovascular pathology;
- Liver disease;
- Renal disease;
- BMI >35;
- Allergies to any anaesthetic drugs.
Contacts and Locations| Contact: Federico F Bilotta | +39 339 33 70 822 | bilotta@tiscali.it |
| Italy | |
| Policlinico UMBERTO I | Recruiting |
| Rome, Italy, 00100 | |
| Contact: Federico F Bilotta +39 339 33 70 822 bilotta@tiscali.it | |
More Information
No publications provided
| Responsible Party: | Federico Bilotta, Policlinico Umberto I |
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT01052337 History of Changes |
| Other Study ID Numbers: | Blade-runner |
| Study First Received: | January 12, 2010 |
| Last Updated: | January 19, 2010 |
| Health Authority: | Italy: Ethics Committee |
Additional relevant MeSH terms:
|
Bone Marrow Diseases Spinal Cord Diseases Hematologic Diseases Central Nervous System Diseases Nervous System Diseases Anesthetics |
Central Nervous System Depressants Physiological Effects of Drugs Pharmacologic Actions Central Nervous System Agents Therapeutic Uses |
ClinicalTrials.gov processed this record on May 22, 2013